Preview

Frankenstein - Fear of the Power of Science

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
787 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Frankenstein - Fear of the Power of Science
‘Some readers have seen the novel as an illustration of the fear of the power of science’
To what extent do you agree with this view of the novel?

I agree to a certain extent with this view, because Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein during the scientific revolution and therefore was influenced by many ideas and experiences of what science can do to you and how it can represent fear and bring about a change. Victor Frankenstein grabs hold of science and tests it boundaries as much as he can. Yet there is an element that represents his inability to do this. He comes across as if he has no true idea of consequences or outcomes for what he is doing, bringing a true element of fear forward for the reader to deal with. He is our unreliable character that has refused to take responsibility for his misdeeds, bringing shame on all his family. Mary Shelley has chosen this character to be in charge of one of the most damaging ideas in this book, science. This alone sends shock and nerves through your body.
In Frankenstein there is a strong element of Science, especially when Victor mentions to Walton his research into the scientists, Franklin, Ritter and Galvani. By looking into these scientists there is a real element of supremacy to their work and excitement; however what they are doing is extremely dangerous and risky, some even putting their own lives at risk in the name of science. Therefore it is evident that science truly represents power and control over people, and by Shelley choosing to write about these scientists, that power and control is transferred over to the novel and Victor’s own story.
I believe that scientific experiments themselves create a fear of the unknown and produce an uncanny feeling. It is unclear what the outcome will be, and results can only truly be guessed at. Therefore when something as serious as creating life is being dealt with, and only by a student of science, the outcome comes across more like a risk, bringing fear about the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    A common theme that is found in both Frankenstein and Bladerunner is the pursuit of scientific knowledge or technological advancement which leads to the creation of artificial life and with this comes the consequences of playing God. As a novel Frankenstein provides an insight into the character’s thought processes. Frankenstein presents the theme of scientific advancement differently to Bladerunner due to the cultural and historical context it was written in. The dawn of the 19th century saw an end to the Enlightenment period where Galvani had only just started the fundamentals of electricity and science was only just beginning to be understood. Values of reason and logic play a prominent role in understanding the meaning and significance behind Frankenstein. Knowledge for the sake of knowledge was a clear motive evident throughout the novel, “The world to me was a secret, which I desired to discover.” Metaphorically addressing how desperately both Victor and Walton wish to understand their environment; it is an incredible secret of the highest value. Although knowledge was considered powerful Shelly demonstrates through Victor that it can…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is a nineteenth century gothic novel that demonstrates the discovery of the nature of electricity. In the novel, electricity plays a major role in creating the life of the monster. Shelley introduces science, especially electricity as an ethical theme and shows it through the life and demise of Victor Frankenstein and his creature. The creation of the monster does lead to Victor’s demise and Shelley parallels the idea to scientific discovery and the future. With knowledge, comes great power and destruction and Shelley views science as a powerful entity but also recognizes the dangers of it, if uncontrolled. Electricity is made up of negative and positive forces pulling against one another and this duality can be applied to all aspects in Frankenstein, including the doubling of characters, good versus evil and the responsibility that Victor does not take toward the monster. Victor creates life from his own greed and in the end, the very being that he gives life to haunts him and tries to take away Victor’s life as well.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Lewis Thomas Prize winner most certainly took advantage of using his own struggles of understanding science to portray how he isn’t so different from his ordinary readers. “When I came to college from my Ohio home town, the most intellectually unnerving thing I discovered was how wrong many of my assumptions were about how the world works—whether the natural or the human-made world” (Gawande 2). He creates a link between the audience and himself via building a sense of relation in which people will be more…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion, the conflict between morality and science is lesser than in the story Frankenstein. Reason being is that if scientists try to make a living creature, its most likely going to be contained so it can’t run around spreading diseases or wreaking havoc. Nobody out there is trying to bring humans back to life. Scientists are looking for ways to make stem cells that can grow and grow so if you get paralyzed you can walk again.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Victor is introduced as a boy yearning to learn about science, but through scientific pursuits is corrupted because of the lack of human contact and want for God-like power.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, she also critiques reason. Since science is a product of reason, Shelly uses it as the theme of critique and shows how it is dangerous. Victor tampers with the dangers of science by vitalizing the creature. During the Romantic era, the heavy industrial development left reactionary resentment, creating a wave of writers like Shelley who thought science to be dangerous. Rather than looking at the world through rational eyes, Romantics embraced the beauty of nature and the world with love. They argued that scientific machinery like factories will ultimately destroy the world. In Frankenstein, the creature is angry with the world due to social prejudice. "Remember that I have power..You are my creator, but I am your master..!" (Pg.224) By inventing a scientific creature that is uncontrollable even by the master, people's lives are jeopardized. Victor had created the monster with benevolent intentions. "I will pioneer a new way, explore unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation." (53) Just as scientists start out with optimism, experiments go wrong and the world has to suffer the consequences. Instead of discovering a method to fight death, Victor has killed everyone around…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the modern twenty-first century society science weaves through our lives in the form of such everyday objects as the television, cellular phones or personal computers. These devices make our lives easier and more comfortable, while highly developed scientific methods and technologies in industry and medication provide us a longer and healthier life, with less work and more leisure time. Though it seems that the development of science has changed our lives for the better, the recurring representation of technophobia…

    • 3529 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The character of Victor Frankenstein satires the argument John Abernethy made in 1814 by calling the result of his ideas catastrophic. Creating life from the “spark” causes Victor pain, which points to the danger and lack of authority Shelley sees in Abernethy’s views. When scientists, like John Abernethy or Victor Frankenstein, assume they are allowed to animate issues of fuzzy consensus, such as power of life or death, they abuse their credibility and knowledge. Not only does this scientist misplace his efforts that could have been useful in a different context, but he looses the public’s trust to handle any further scientific matter.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although language that produces fear can be effective, it is also something that cannot be done in good conscience. In examining this, I think that it is important to again think about politics’ place in science. Politics should not bring about fear when…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific discovery and creation, whilst being the product of an inventive mentality, ambition and a progressive pursuit of understanding, can lead us down a destructive and ultimately costly path. Through lines such as “Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example” and “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” are two examples which demonstrate that Frankenstein realises the monstrosity of his creation and that while chasing perfection, he had only moved further away from it. After the creation awakens, Frankenstein is so horrifies he retreats to his bedroom where he falls asleep only to have a nightmare. The nightmare is a premonition of Frankenstein’s bleak future brought upon him by none other than his creation as well as a symbolic event which shows even in sleep he cannot escape what he has unleashed upon the world. The monsters request for an identical partner is one which frightens Frankenstein as he has realised the negative implications the first monster has had on his own life. By tearing apart the second monster and subsequently sacrificing his family and himself, Frankenstein is determined to regress back to the point which he knew nothing of the secret of life “how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow”. The creation of the monster can also be seen as a point where a deterioration of Frankenstein’s physical and mental health becomes apparent. Frankenstein’s failing health is a symbolic cost which Frankenstein must bear; as well as this his family is either killed or die from something related to the monster and it is these “costs” which he must endure for attempting to play…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the other hand, the typical casual argument against science is the fear of what…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There cannot be good without evil. This is one of the most important lessons that I have learned growing up and I will keep this close by me as I get even older. Conflict between two ideals is a great place to find meaning and lenses for us to view our world. I had this conflict with myself starting at a young age. This conflict came about when I started thinking about what I wanted to do with my life.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the present world of evolving science, the moral and ethical factors are being weighed more heavily in one’s quest for scientific discovery. This science fiction film displays these factors and the ramifications of one’s actions. I also believe the movie was intended to warn the general public of the inherent dangers of both science and technology and scientists are most likely refrain from asking ethical questions concerning their work in the interest of the pursuit of science.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Raising science to the status of godhood carries with it inherit risks that demand careful…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and technology

    • 1116 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Science and technology is a vital part of our society's world and how we function. Unless you happen to live out in the middle of the Sahara Desert and have sworn off all aspects of technology and science, then you are most likely exposed constantly to science in your daily life. While it is a big part of our world, there is a constant uneasy relationship between human beings and science. It is a common axiom that people don't trust what they don't understand. That is exactly what drives and causes this unsteady relationship people have with science. People never want to put full faith and confidence into the untouchable, comprehendible, or viewable. Trust is what really brings people to wonder about science and subconsciously fear it. Because we cannot reconcile some things science and technology give us, our immediate reaction is to set ourselves away or fear it. It is human nature to want to question and have some form of apprehension toward the thing we cannot fully reconcile. We see this is all forms of science and technology in our society. From the physical features of science such as technology and medicine to even scientific theories and cerebral and abstract parts of science, all forms in some way can make people uneasy. It makes you wonder however, why someone would fear something that is always attempting to be beneficial. Research and discoveries are usually made solely to help the individual and or society as a whole. So what are we as people so unnerved about? From even the most mundane actions and events in our lives to our moral beliefs and views, we see in every aspect of science the questioning and doubt by people.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays