Foucauldian Studies and Hrm
Foucauldian Studies and HRM
Chenchen Liu
Abstract When discussing and analyzing the nature of human resource management, Foucault, who not studying HRM, gives us much space to think about HRM in different ways. His theory on discourse, power and knowledge greatly influence the studies on HRM. This paper will follow Foucauldian studies on HRM, discussing three contributions Foucauldianism studies on HRM including HRM as discourse, HRM and power, and an essential part of HRM, employee selection. Based on Foucualdian studies, individuals can have new understandings on HRM, both in theoretical and practical field.
Keywords: human resource management, discourse, power, employee selection.
Introduction
When considering about human resource management (HRM) being understood as discourse, it is necessary to connect Foucault’ s theory on discourse with employee selection as a crucial part of human resource management. Though Foucault himself not a specialist in HRM, it appears that numerous organization studies scholars tend to drawn on Foucault’s ideas for the purpose of re-analyzing and re-understanding HRM. (Barrantt, 2001) The reason is that Foucault’s understanding of the relationship between discourse, truth and power implies how we should regard HRM from different perspective and put it into re-consideration. Generally, discourse could be understand as ‘ a set of concepts, expressions and statements that constitutes a way of talking or writing about an aspect of the world, thus framing the way people understand and act with regard to that aspect of the world’ (Watson, 2002: 118). And in Foucault’s view, discourse is a flexible term. In one of Foucault’ s book, The Archaeology of Knowledge, published in 1969, was an outstanding work of post-structuralism example. He believes that discourse is a statement unity. It talks about the statement (énoncé), which is a rule for the discursive expression
Chenchen Liu
Abstract When discussing and analyzing the nature of human resource management, Foucault, who not studying HRM, gives us much space to think about HRM in different ways. His theory on discourse, power and knowledge greatly influence the studies on HRM. This paper will follow Foucauldian studies on HRM, discussing three contributions Foucauldianism studies on HRM including HRM as discourse, HRM and power, and an essential part of HRM, employee selection. Based on Foucualdian studies, individuals can have new understandings on HRM, both in theoretical and practical field.
Keywords: human resource management, discourse, power, employee selection.
Introduction
When considering about human resource management (HRM) being understood as discourse, it is necessary to connect Foucault’ s theory on discourse with employee selection as a crucial part of human resource management. Though Foucault himself not a specialist in HRM, it appears that numerous organization studies scholars tend to drawn on Foucault’s ideas for the purpose of re-analyzing and re-understanding HRM. (Barrantt, 2001) The reason is that Foucault’s understanding of the relationship between discourse, truth and power implies how we should regard HRM from different perspective and put it into re-consideration. Generally, discourse could be understand as ‘ a set of concepts, expressions and statements that constitutes a way of talking or writing about an aspect of the world, thus framing the way people understand and act with regard to that aspect of the world’ (Watson, 2002: 118). And in Foucault’s view, discourse is a flexible term. In one of Foucault’ s book, The Archaeology of Knowledge, published in 1969, was an outstanding work of post-structuralism example. He believes that discourse is a statement unity. It talks about the statement (énoncé), which is a rule for the discursive expression
References: Barrantt, E. (2001) Foucault, Foucauldianism and human resource management. Personnel Review, 31 (2). Barrantt, E. (2003) Foucault, HRM and the Ethos of the Critical Management Scholar. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (5). BRAVERMAN, H. (1976). Labour and monopoly capital. New York, N.Y., Monthly Review. Bright Hub PM (2011) Exploring Different Perspectives of HR Management. [online] Available at: http://www.brighthubpm.com/ [Accessed: 2 Dec 2012]. COOK, M. F. (1992). The AMA handbook for employee recruitment and retention. New York, American Management Association. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2921. Du Gay, P. et al. (1996) The conduct of management and the management of conduct. Journal of Management Studies, 33 (3). Edgar, F. and Geare, A. (2005) Employee voice on human resource management. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43 (3). Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books. FOUCAULT, M. (1969). L ' archeologie du savoir. [França], Gallimard. FOUCAULT, M. (1971). The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. New York, Pantheon Books. FOUCAULT, M. (1980). The history of sexuality. New York, Vintage Books. Foucault, M FOUCAULT, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York, Pantheon Books. FOUCAULT, M. (1971). The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. New York, Pantheon Books. FOUCAULT, M., MARTIN, L. H., GUTMAN, H., & HUTTON, P. H. (1988). Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, University of Massachusetts Press. French, J. (1953) Experiments in Field Settings. In: Festinger, L. and Katz, D. eds. (1953) Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences. 1st ed. Dryden Press. Frenkel, S. et al. (1995) Re-constituting Work: Trends Towards Knowledge Work and Info-normative control. Work, Employment and Society, 9 (4). Guion, R. and Gottier, R. (1965) Validity of Personality Measures in Personnel Selection. Personnel Psychology, 18 (2). KLEIMAN, L. S. (2000). Human resource management: a managerial tool for competitive advantage. Cincinnati, South-Western College Pub. Knights, D. and Mccabe, D. (2003) Governing through Teamwork: Reconstituting Subjectivity in Call Centre. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (7). Knights, D. and Vurdabakis, T. (1994) Foucault, power, resistance and all that. In: Jermier, J. et al. eds. (1994) Resistance and Power in Origanisations . 1st ed. London: Routledge. Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (1985) Power and identity in theory and practice. Sociological Review, 33 p.22-46. Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (1989) ower and subjectivity at work: from degradation to subjuga- tion in social relations. Sociology, 23 (4), p.535-58. LEGGE, K. (1995). Human resource management: rhetorics and realities. Basingstoke, England, Macmillan Business. Luke, A. (1999). Critical Discourse Analysis. In J. P. Keeves & G. Lakomski (Eds.), Issues in Educational Research. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990) Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19 (1). Nadesan, M. (1997) Constructing Paper Dolls: The Discourse of Personality Testing in Organizational Practice. Communication Theory, 7 (3). POOLE, M. (1999). Human resource management: critical perspectives on business and management. London, Routledge. Price, A. (2011) Human Resource Management. 4th ed. Stamford: Cengage Learning EMEA. Townley, B. (1993) Foucault, Power/Knowledge, and its relevance for Human Resource Management. Academy of Management Review, 18 (3). WATSON, D. F. (2002). The intertexture of apocalyptic discourse in the New Testament. Leiden, Brill. WETHERELL, M., YATES, S., & TAYLOR, S. (2001). Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London, SAGE. Whitener, E. (2001) Do ‘high commitment’ human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross level analysis using hierarchical linear modelling. . Journal of Management, 27 (515), p.35.