Preview

Ford

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1221 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ford
In 2006 Ford Motor Company was in tough shape and had lost 25% of its market share since 1990. They had lost $12.7 billion, its worst performance ever. They held a portfolio of brands that require major capital infusions like Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin, and Volvo. Labor costs were as high as $76/hour and was making the company’s operating margins uncompetitive here in the U.S. and overseas. Japanese automakers development of new automobiles were months ahead of Ford’s at the time also leading to their struggle. Ford knew they had to do something to turn this tough time around for the company to survive and be profitable again. On the brink of bankruptcy the company made drastic changes. William Clay Ford, Jr dismissed himself as Chief Executive Officer in September of 2006. Ford named Alan Mulally Chief Executive Officer and President of the company to replace him. This was risky because he had no automotive experience and past efforts of hiring outside for this role for Ford had failed. He previously served as Executive Vice President of the Boeing Company and then President and Chief Executive Officer of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Inc. from September 1998 to September 2006. There were many problems within Ford before Mulally arrived that needed to be corrected in order for the company to become successful and profitable again. They were notorious for their caustic corporate culture. Executives put their own advancement and the success of their own department ahead of the bottom line. This caused little to be accomplished beyond self – preservation. Mulally created weekly “Business Plan Review” meetings and made them a safe environment where data could be shared without blame. Before this executives would enter meetings eyeing each other for advantage, looking for weak spots in each other’s armor and vulnerability. Mulally encouraged them to help each other with problems and work as a team. He tied each executive’s performance to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 520 Assignment 3

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    chief engineer for development of the 777, and was later Vice President of Engineering for commercial aircraft. Mulally had no sales experience, and he wasn't a "Detroit car man, “Much less a car man at all. He sold his Lexus after moving to Dearborn. What's most impressive is Mulally's "results oriented" leadership style. His management is crisp and authoritative, although he defers to the firm's design experts on the minutiae of the product lines. But on the big questions of the company's past mistakes and where it's headed, Mulalley made key decisions that placed Ford in good stead. When mulally testified before Congress in December 2008, along with GM's Rick Wagoner and Chrysler's Robert Nardelli, he announced that Ford would be able to survive the…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In our last discussion, I believe that everyone in this course is ready to move forward in their path to the success, and always learning by different leaders. In this case Alan Mullaly is one of the greatest leaders of the century , not just because is a good guy, also for his leadership style ,the way how he lead Ford, because before Allan Mullally was hired Ford had lost in the way. He took over as Ford CEO in September 2006 during that time he knows a little bit about of the automobile industry because in the past he was the CEO of Boeing. I believe that it was the right decision to hire Mullaly because when he was working at Boeing he made different contributions in the development of the company. At that time…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus/520 Week 1

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He devised a process that moved it towards those goals and implemented a management system to ensure the company obtained those goals. His approach he felt was mandatory since the leadership prior to his arrival led to catastrophic financial loss of over 12.6 billion in 2006 another 2.7 billion in 2007 in an evitable recession of 2008-2009. His effective leadership style led to major stream lining of the Ford product to accelerate development of new products and create a global enterprise for automotive…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry Ford Accomplishments

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Henry Ford was one of America’s greatest businesspersons, the founder of Ford Motor Company and the man largely responsible for mass production in the American economy. This achievement led Ford to becoming a rich and famous man. Ever since Ford was a child, he had a dream to become an engineer and to manufacture cars. He began to pursue his dream when he introduced the Assembly line, by breaking down production into simple tasks. He lowered the skill level needed to work in a factory, which allowed enormous amounts of products to be produced at lower prices. During the 1920’s, Henry Ford’s management skills and leadership of The Ford Motor Company expanded the economy by making cars available to all Americans and stimulating…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford Motor

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Q1. Does Ford have too much cash? Why did Ford choose to accumulate so much cash? And why…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Alan Mulally came to Ford Motor Company from Boeing, Ford was in a massive financial crisis. In 2006 car sales were industry-wide strong, but for Ford Motor Company it was a $12.6 billion loss year (Ingrassia, 2010). Alan Mulally…

    • 1467 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mulally exhibited the vision and courage to lead Ford Motor Company to its highest standing in the automaker industry using basic leadership principles. “Ford Motor Company has been able to record a net profit of $2.7 billion for 2009, despite the fact that the company had a loss of $12.7 billion three years earlier in 2006 when Mulally assumed leadership and had to deal with the consequences of global financial crisis in between” (Dudovskiy, 2013). What is most interesting about the way in which he transformed the products and culture of Ford is that he had very little experience in the auto industry. Instead, Mulally capitalized on his management and leadership skills and brought to the table a clear vision, creativity, and communication that encouraged trust, all characteristics of the transformational leadership skills he possessed which allowed him to…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ford Motor

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Last but not least, quality school of management is another one. To make better products and services, the leaders of Ford Motor Company have created many plans and made them real.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ford

    • 1035 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Ford Motor Company is headquartered in Dearborn, Michigan which is a suburb of Detroit. In 1901 Henry Ford made his first attempt in the auto industry. He started a company known as the Henry Ford Company on November 3, 1901 which was later sold to the Cadillac Motor Company in 1902. Mr. Ford retained the rights to his name and was able to establish The Ford Motor Company with initial investment of cash from prospective stockholders in 1903. Ford has contributed many firsts to the auto industry with such things as the first engine with a removable cylinder head in 1908 to the introduction of the assembly line in 1913, as well as the first car with a windshield. In later years he also brought to the industry improved safety with the redesign of the steering wheel the addition of rear seatbelts, even child proof door locks (“Ford Motor Company,” 2014).…

    • 1035 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ford Motor Company, founded in 1903 by Henry Ford, is synonymous with American innovation and capitalism. With iconic branding and revolutionary manufacturing processes, Ford was the world’s No. 2 automaker for decades, second only to General Motors (“Ford Motor Company”, 2012). But the winds changed for the American automakers, the combinations of poor leadership, complacently, high manufacturing costs, poor customer satisfaction, labor disputes and ever stronger foreign competition from Toyota, Hyundai, Honda and others cost them valuable global market share and customer loyalty. By 2006 Ford did something that many thought was a desperate move by an ailing giant; they borrowed $23.6 billion. The loan became Ford’s lifeline when the global financial crisis of 2008 hit and the auto industry tanked with it. By 2009, Ford was the only American automaker that did not receive a government bailout, and by 2010 Ford’s US sales surpassed GM’s, a feat that hadn’t happened in over 50 years (“Ford Motor Company”, 2012). During this time of financial crisis, Ford has adopted a new strategy that it calls “ONE Ford” which has dramatically restructured the company’s mission and goals. By using the Balanced Scorecard approach Ford’s business unit leaders can translate the ONE Ford’s “lofty vision and strategy statements” into actionable “objectives and measures” at the local level (Kaplan…

    • 4099 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Motor Company

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The amount of cash that Ford is carrying on its balance sheet is too much considering that additional money not used for the advancement of the company belongs to the owners of the firm, the shareholders. Having too much cash on its balance sheet will be a disincentive to Ford’s employees who consequently will feel not feel an urgency to perform and add value to the company. Notwithstanding the fact that the company is always on the lookout for acquisition targets even after already purchasing Jaguar Cars, Volvo Cars, and Land Rover in the past ten years, it is imperative that the company does not engage in such activities for the sole purpose of “empire building.” Rather, the company should only pursue those companies that will add value to the overall firm. By 2000, Ford extinguished all of their expanding opportunities. By calculating the WACC and subtracting the Interest Earned on their Cash Holdings, we as a group were able to calculate Ford’s Opportunity Cost of Capital. 11.5% - 4.79% = 6.71%. Thus, it is costing Ford 6.71% per annum to sit on this cash. On the other hand, the fact that Ford’s current, quick, & cash ratios from 1996-1999 are lower than the ratios for its competitors represents a concern in terms of Ford possibly having little wiggle room in relation to paying down its short term obligations. Ford having the higher debt to total asset ratio relative to GM over this period is another cause of unease as using too much debt to pay for its assets can raise the company’s cost of capital. However, fact that its leverage ratio is lower than GM over this four year period demonstrates the company’s solvency and high market capitalization. Using the full $10B to pay for the Value Enhancement Program as a result will decrease its liquidity further and is also a worry due to the cyclicality of the Auto Industry’s profits. Therefore, it is our recommendation that…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Ka

    • 2575 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The primary decision Gilles Moynier must make is determining the target market for the Ford Ka. Effective targeting is highly dependent on meaningful segmentation, so selecting an appropriate segmentation methodology from the variety of alternatives is another important decision Moynier must make. Moynier’s decisions must align with Ford’s objectives and also unite all the major stakeholders behind the Ka. Once the Ka’s target is identified, Moynier can develop the product’s positioning, finalize its marketing strategy and begin planning tactics.…

    • 2575 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the history of Ford, company distinguished itself by iron control of Henry Ford the first and the second. Their “great man” approach brought success to Ford, but eventually this approach became ineffective due to globalization and changing environment. This resulted in the need for followers of Henry Ford the second to introduce the big change for company, change in leadership approach and organizational culture. In addition Ford opened branches almost all over the world, so new approaches, vision and leadership is needed.…

    • 2095 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Hybrid Car Case Bass

    • 3236 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In September 2006, Alan Mulally had just taken over as the CEO of Ford, the…

    • 3236 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alan Mulally aimed to change the corporate culture at Ford. He aimed to bring about honesty and transparency in the company. He realised that the executives at the company did not function as team. Each was trying to protect his own turf. The company functioned as multiple separate units. Alan Mulally wanted to bring in transparency and honesty to the culture at Ford. He started weekly Business Process Review (BPR) meetings where senior executives of the company would make presentations of the condition of the units they led. They were expected to be very honest in these meetings and strict disciplinary procedures were put into place. Initially, the executives were reluctant to share true details about their units and always painted a better…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics