Food Deserts: A Brief Summary
This Journal was written by Bitler and Haider’s and is important for numerous reasons. First, Bitler and Haider concluded that there is insufficient empirical work demonstrating rationales for the existence of the food desert. The existence of this research gap is important, because it justifies scholarly studies exploring the question of why food deserts exist in the first place. Second, Bitler and Haider called the concept of a food desert into question, suggesting that insufficient empirical rigor has been brought to bear on the question of exactly what constitutes a food desert. This point is particularly important, because defenders of the argument believe that food deserts result from a conscious attempt to deprive the poor of access