Preview

Feminist perpectives on family

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
671 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Feminist perpectives on family
Feminist Perspectives of the Family
There are many different feminist views on the family and how the family should be due to the different strands of feminism, for example: Radical feminists believe that men try to dominate, control and exploit women; Marxist feminists make a direct connection between capitalism and the inferior position women hold in society; and liberal feminists believe that gender inequality comes from ignorance and the social constraints on freedom of choice.
Radical feminists see the family as male dominated as men are the ‘bread-winners’ and play and instrumental role in the family, so they make all the financial decisions, and that men will often use force to keep the family this way, oppressing the woman in the family. This view criticises the New Rights view of the nuclear family and its ignorance of the negative side of the family. Radical feminists often stress the significant amount of domestic violence from men against women in order to get their own way within the family. They also think women become trapped in a marriage with their husbands as they are economically dependent on the husbands, especially after children are born as the women are expected to give up work and look after the children. Radical feminists also believe that women are used as sex objects as a way for the man to unwind after a day at work, and women are rarely given any emotional support from their husbands yet they are expected to give emotional support to their husbands. A criticism of this view is that radical feminists put too much emphasis on the negative side of the family and it ignores the possibility that women enjoy running the home and raising the children.
Marxist feminists emphasise how capitalism uses the family to oppress women and the consequences the family has on women’s lives. Margaret Benston (1972) argued that capitalism benefits from the unpaid workforce of women who are willing to do what they are told because they have been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Firstly, feminists propose that there are inequalities between husband and wives, this is evident through the domestic division of labour. Feminists would blame underlying patriarchy for the inequalities between husband and wives. The domestic division of labour consists of men working and women staying at home to take responsibility of household labour, such as childcare and cleaning. Women take more of a role as the domestic worker, as seen by the survey in Item A, even if they are working full-time. Men have more power because they are the primary breadwinner; Radical feminists would argue that this institution benefits men more than women. They would argue that men sometimes abuse this power, for instance through domestic violence if women do not accept the patriarchal order (Item C). Men earn the money and this takes power away from women, this may be an explanation to why women suffer more domestic violence than men (Mirrlees-Black, 1999). Another example of this would be that only very recently it became illegal for a husband to rape his wife (1991).…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will be assessing the contribution of feminist sociologists to an understanding of family roles and relationships. There are different roles in families such as: Conjugal; where both the partners share task such as housework and childcare, the opposite of this would be segregated roles; where the couples have separate roles, the male is breadwinner and has the instrumental role and the female is the housewife and has the expressive role. A dual earner is a couple…. A single parent is a person who has been divorced or been widowed and has to take care of the children they had with the previous partner. Furthermore there are different types of relationships between families such as equal; where the husband and wife both have an equal say and are treated equally, however it can be one-sided; where the husband or wife are more dominant which can lead to domestic violence, it could also be democratic; where the family all vote for something instead of one person taking the decisions, but it can also be patriarchal; where the male take the main decisions and Is the breadwinner. A feminist is a person that argues that sociology has traditionally taken a ‘male stream’ perspective and ignores female viewpoint; they examine women’s experiences and study society from a female’s perspective. There are different types of feminism: Liberal, Marxists, Radical and Difference Feminism. They all tend to be critical of the nature of a women’s role and relationship inside families because they see them as grossly patriarchal, oppressive and unfair, as mentioned in Item B. On the other hand, the different types of feminist don’t agree with each other’s perspective on ideas of families and households, and they tend to clash.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly one must look at the division of domestic labour and conjugal roles. Conjugal roles refer to the roles performed by men and women in relation to housework, childcare and paid work. Traditionally men had the instrumental ‘bread-winning’ role which the women had the expressive role (childcare and primary socialisation). Feminists say that the traditional division of labour is neither natural nor beneficial to women as their expressive role is unpaid and taken for granted. However different feminist views disagree on who benefits from this unpaid labour. Marxist feminists would argue it is capitalism that benefits most as wives keep their husbands happy and therefore they are left with a content workforce. On the other hand, radical feminists would argue that men are the main people to gain from women’s oppression as we live in a patriarchal society. A functionalist view from Wilmott and Young says that there has been a ‘march of progress’ in which the family has become more symmetrical with more joint conjugal roles (where both partners share the household labour). However feminists reject this view with Oakley arguing the family still remains patriarchal and Boulton saying the evidence to support the alleged rise in symmetry is weak, and that the responsibility for childcare still lies with women.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist and Feminist sociologists have criticised Murdoch’s theory. They say that Functionalism ignores conflict and exploitation within society. Feminists see the family as being patriarchal and serving the needs of men and Marxists see the family as meeting the needs of capitalism and not the needs of the family members.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another type of feminist is Marxism, these argue that the main cause of oppression of women in the family is capitalism and not men as suggested by other feminists. Women’s oppression have several functions for capitalism, these include: Women reproduce…

    • 880 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    That Nancy Hartstock should follow Karl Marx’s lead in developing her “Feminist Standpoint” - the perspective of the oppressed in a ‘phallocratic’ regime in order to describe the oppressive dynamics of the ruling gender – did not surprise me. After all, as she explains, it is only through his use of a proletariat perspective that enabled Marx to accurately view and describe the exchange of values that ultimately benefits the bourgeoisie with surplus value, much to the detriment of their workers, subsequently left to survive on subsistence-wages. Given its historic standing, political credentials and academic regard, Marxist understanding of capital and capitalism would be the logical blueprint upon which to build a more modern analysis…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxist feminists argue that the nuclear family functions to benefit the capitalist’s ideology and the patriarchal ideology. Marxists feminists argue that the focus on women as mothers puts considerable pressure on women to have children and to take time out of the labour market to bring them up. This pressure can make women feel oppressed which can be beneficial to capitalists and men as it stops women from rising up against them and trying to break the model of the stereotypical ‘housewife’ role.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxists say that the family serves capitalism in four ways. Firstly the family socialises their children, they reproduce labour power and have an acceptance of capitalism. Secondly women’s domestic work is unpaid which benefits capitalism (this would be an argument that is also put forward by feminists). Thirdly the family acts as a comfort for the stresses and frustrations of working class men they are there to ‘Cushion the main provider’. Lastly the family as a unit of consumption buys the goods and services provided by capitalism. The claim that capitalistic societies are exploitative societies also appears to be true when you take into account the relationship between the…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    dr dre sample tracks

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Feminism was a theoretical sociological perspective that was very strong from the 60s. These theorists believe that men opress women. Marxist feminists have suggested that the housewife role was a social construction by men after industrialisation to serve the interests of capitalism and to keep women in the home where they 'should be'. They believe that it is thought that womens role is in the home to take on domestic labour, childcare and perform the expressive role so the 'proletariat' working men can come home and be the king of their castle (as suggested by Zaratsky). Feminisist believe the housewife role exploits women. However C. Hakim suggested it is not the idea of patriarchy that keeps women in the home, but the fact that they actually want to be and enjoy it. Anne Oakly suggested that if society subscribes to the view that women have a maternal instinct, then women who opt not to have children will be seen as deviant. Her argument is that women should have the choice to not have children without being deemed strange or wrong. This has caused many changes and modern attitudes are now more accepting of this change in the role of women. Greer suggested that within families, female children are gender-role socialised into accepting their future role in their own families as being the carer and housewife. This, she argues, is done through encouraging play through dolls, soft toys and pretend cookers etc*.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist feminists, such as Benston, argue that the typical nuclear family provides the basic commodity required by capitalism, such as reproducing in order to maintain a workforce, and also maintaining the present workforce’s health and wellbeing. She therefore argues, that both men and women play an important role, whilst conforming to a New Right perspective on the matter.…

    • 712 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the family, feminists argue that during primary socialisation boys and girls are forced in to gender role stereotypes, for example, girls playing with toy cookers and baby dolls and boys playing with toy cars. Another way feminists argue that girls and boys are socialised in to gender roles is that typically girls are dressed in pink and boys are dressed in blue. This therefore prepares them girls for future life as a mother, who has responsibility of child care and housework while the man is the breadwinner. Feminists also argue society as being oppressive to women as childcare almost always falls on them. This is apparent in many family types and supported by the fact that almost all single parent families are run by the mother of the child and not the father, therefore restricting them to what they can do outside of the family. However functionalists would argue that feminists focus too much on the conflict within the family and not the positive functions that the family, nuclear in particular, produce. Feminists have also argued that the family is oppressive to women as it enables them to be subject to domestic violence. They argue that women are less likely to report any domestic abuse while in a marriage or cohabiting therefore enabling men to get away with it.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is an economic system in which private ownership controls all of the means of production for profit and exploits the proletariat class, selling their products for more money than paying the working class for their labour. Benefits that the family provide through capitalism include the inheritance of private property, socialisation into acceptance of inequality and a source of profits – all of these which do not benefit the members of the family. Capitalism leads to family playing a major role in profits as they are the market for the sale of consumer goods. Family fulfil this role by persuading families to ‘keep up with the Joneses’ by consuming the latest products, ‘pester power’ which persuades parents to spend more on their children, especially if their child do not have the latest gadgets, clothes etc. and being mocked because of this. The capitalist system requires nuclear monogamous relationships as it is needed for private ownership, as said by Friedrich Engels.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I am discussing how history, ideology and policy perspectives establish problems with the definition of family. My main focus will be identifying how family violence and abuse within families challenge the functionalist approach to family. The definition of ‘family’ is extremely broad; however I will only be focusing on the functionalist approach which is the nuclear family. Functionalists believe that the nuclear family is the ‘ideal’ family type and is seen as the traditional family. The history perspective will explore how domestic violence has become more of a problem throughout the year. I will include how domestic violence has appeared to increase over the years which also link with policy and ideology because there are new laws linked to domestic violence and theorists such as feminists who have spoken up about domestic violence. History is used ideologically to produce policies for the present. Ideology will focus on different peoples beliefs on the definition of family and the effect domestic violence can have on a functionalist approach to family. The perspective of policy will concentrate on new laws that have been put in place which have a positive effect on the damage of domestic violence. A policy perspective also emphasises how important these laws have become and the effect it has had on the functionalist approach to family. An understanding of the past and present helps society to understand where present policies and ideologies have been produced. All of these perspectives have a connection with one another, for example, throughout history there have been new policies put in place to help decrease domestic violence.…

    • 2875 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Power Control Theory

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This looks at paternalistic families and egalitarian families. The differences is in paternalistic the father works and is the breadwinner while the mother takes care of the home and children. Egalitarian families have both parents working and share equal power in the home. These two families alter delinquency, paternalistic delinquency is increased in the boys unlike the daughters. However they become similar in the egalitarian families. Feminists have constructed their own assessments of the indifference and the two that are often used is the Liberal Feminist and the Critical Feminist. Liberal Feminists, go at the social differences between their male counterpart which they believe offer fewer opportunities to commit a crime. They believe that equilibrium will occur once the roles become similar. Critical Feminists look at the unequal split of power between the man and the woman where the male exploits the woman. The book says that this originates through the onset of male supremacy of the male to control the female's’…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Office for National Statistics, research has shown that in 1996 there were 5,223 nuclear families and in 2012 the number of nuclear families has decreased to 4,610 families. It could be argued that the nuclear family is longer the norm because statistics even support this. One particular reason for this would be that the divorce rate has increased, research shows that now 40% of marriages now end in divorce. This would then leaned to lone-parent (single) families and reconstituted families. In the 1940s women were seen as housewives and mothers that didn’t have any other life, having an education was simply out of the question. Whereas women today go into much further education as men which therefore gives them a much higher status and independence. This may be the reason for why divorce rates have increased rapidly. The main reason for why women used to get married was to reproduce as they couldn’t do anything else other than that. Women had no financial support for which they had to rely on their husbands. In today’s society women don’t need any financial support as they are independent and self-reliant. Feminist’s state that they are exploited within the family, they are taken advantage of. They have to do all the housework,…

    • 2071 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics