Preview

outline and evaluate the feminist view on the role of the family (33 marks)

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
658 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
outline and evaluate the feminist view on the role of the family (33 marks)
Outline and evaluate the feminist view of the role of the family (33 marks)
There are different types of feminists they all have different views on the family. Feminists mainly believe that the family is a patriarchal ideology which is control mainly by male dominated ideas. They feel that they are stereotyped to have the expressive role in the family and that they have to live by this role.
Marxist feminists argue that the nuclear family functions to benefit the capitalist’s ideology and the patriarchal ideology. Marxists feminists argue that the focus on women as mothers puts considerable pressure on women to have children and to take time out of the labour market to bring them up. This pressure can make women feel oppressed which can be beneficial to capitalists and men as it stops women from rising up against them and trying to break the model of the stereotypical ‘housewife’ role.
These children that the women bring up then become the workforce of the future to little expense of the capitalists, they have already been primary socialised to act the way that society ‘expects’ them to, therefore this allows the capitalists to exploit them to work long hours for little money because they feel that they cannot rise up against the capitalists as they think that how they are being exploited is normal.
Radical feminists argue that the nuclear family mainly benefits men because gender-socialization results in males and females subscribing to a set of ideas that largely confirm male power and superiority. They believe that the nuclear family is the main place in which male dominated ideas are transmitted to children; this encourages sexual division of labour which is then classed as ‘natural’ and unable to be changed.
This can also lead to the exploitation of women as patriarchal ideology mainly views women as sexual objects when they are single and mothers/housewives when married and they cannot change these stereotypes as they are set by society and are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Each group in society has a different idea on what the main role of the family is. As Item 2B says, “Marxists see all social institutions as serving the interests of capitalism.” This includes the family, and they say that it serves the interests of capitalism by maintaining and justifying class inequality and exploitation by the rich. Other groups, however, have different opinions, such as Functionalists who think that the family performs essential needs of society. Marxists and Functionalists opinions are completely contrasted, as Marxists think that we live in a Capitalist society based on unequal conflict between the classes, whilst Functionalists see society as based on “value consensus”, where everyone agrees.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many sociologists (e.g. Goran Therborn) argue that the typical nuclear family has disintegrated due to many different reasons, for example, the rise in feminism and women gaining more independence; higher diversity of relationships for example higher divorce rates, higher number of families co-habiting. his is because families aren’t like what they used to be. In the nuclear families today, the roles of the mother and father are no longer segregated conjugal roles. In the nuclear family today roles are changing and developing into integrated conjugal roles. Partners are becoming more egalitarian which is leading to the nuclear symmetrical family. Due to the symmetrical family developing socialists believe the idea of the ‘new man’. A man that shares housework and the responsibility of the children.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, Zaretsky(1976) sees the nuclear family as a contributing factor to the capitalist system for a number of reasons. For example, the family consumes the commodities produced by capitalism that helps the bourgeoisie to make profits, but this is negative for the proletariat family as they spend their money to help the ruling class. Another example is that the proletariat produces future generations of workers who will go on to make profits for the bourgeoisie which makes them even wealthier. Lastly, the family socializes its children into norms and values which supports the position of the ruling class through obeying the authority and unquestioningly accept inequality as ineitability of life. This si negative of the subject class as they will continue to serve the ruling class, but it is positive for them as they get a lot of generations of worker. These views are supported by David Cooper(1972), who sees the family as 'an ideological conditioning device' in which children learn to conform to authority to become cooperative and easily exploited workers.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another type of feminist is Marxism, these argue that the main cause of oppression of women in the family is capitalism and not men as suggested by other feminists. Women’s oppression have several functions for capitalism, these include: Women reproduce…

    • 880 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The nuclear family ensures that generation after generation remain embroiled in capitalism. The nuclear family is an ideal way to condition the family into capitalism, which reproduces the ideologies of capitalism…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term ‘Patriarchy’ itself can be broadly defined as an ideological system of belief that privileges males over females. This is a complex system that employs androcentric values, rituals and practices in order to maintain status quo. Another means of control involves patriarchy passing itself off as the so-called ‘norm’ or the ‘right’ way in which a society must divide itself, and regards the Female as a departure from this ‘norm’ and treats her as ‘the other’, a notion that only reinforces the…

    • 2166 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The socialisation starts within the family and relatives where babies are imposed to four processes identified by Oakley as: manipulation, canalization, verbal appellations and differential activity exposure. Through these, parents teach their children things such as eating, dressing, talking and behaving suitably (manners, socialising with other kids) in order to help them successfully function in society later in life. Sometimes, parents tend to hold hegemonic stereotyped views of typical characteristics of boys and girls which are used as norms when socialising their children, in order to help them get accepted within the society – boys and girls are expected to behave in certain ways. Feminists would argue that because of such socialisation, women have a worse start when growing up (eg. always has been taught to be emotional and obey men) and therefore possess less power and opportunities in the society. This well explains the process of socialisation, however, Marxists would disagree, as they believe that it does not matter what gender you are – their view would be that social class is the most important factor that influences the process of socialisation. This suggests that if a girl or a boy has been immersed in upper class’ culture, due to the parents’ habitus, both of the genders would have equal chances to gain power and status in society through their natural confidence, private-schooling, parent’s contacts etc. This is supported by Bourdieu’s cultural capital which suggests that being brought up by the parents with the education, knowledge, language, attitudes and values possessed by the upper-class - will have an impact on the process of primary socialisation because, as Marxists believe, social class is the most crucial…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    dr dre sample tracks

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Feminism was a theoretical sociological perspective that was very strong from the 60s. These theorists believe that men opress women. Marxist feminists have suggested that the housewife role was a social construction by men after industrialisation to serve the interests of capitalism and to keep women in the home where they 'should be'. They believe that it is thought that womens role is in the home to take on domestic labour, childcare and perform the expressive role so the 'proletariat' working men can come home and be the king of their castle (as suggested by Zaratsky). Feminisist believe the housewife role exploits women. However C. Hakim suggested it is not the idea of patriarchy that keeps women in the home, but the fact that they actually want to be and enjoy it. Anne Oakly suggested that if society subscribes to the view that women have a maternal instinct, then women who opt not to have children will be seen as deviant. Her argument is that women should have the choice to not have children without being deemed strange or wrong. This has caused many changes and modern attitudes are now more accepting of this change in the role of women. Greer suggested that within families, female children are gender-role socialised into accepting their future role in their own families as being the carer and housewife. This, she argues, is done through encouraging play through dolls, soft toys and pretend cookers etc*.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxists believe that the nuclear family is dominant in Society. They see the family in the classic way and they all perform essential functions and do a lot of things for each other and stick to the classic roles of the man is the breadwinner where he goes out and makes all the money to supply for the family, the mother does the house work but still earns money to supply for the family and looks after the children etc, the traditional family sort of lifestyle. Marxists believe that the family all just go out to earn money and this money is supplied in to the family to keep them going with things like food and drink, utilities and other things like that, a quote from Zaretesky was that when the man returns home after work he is the ‘king of the castle’ basically saying that the main is in charge and makes the most money, again backing up the view that Marxists believe the family should be traditional and the man is the breadwinner with his partner caring and cooking for him etc but more gives the man satisfaction as some views believe that the mother runs the household as she does all of the work and runs the house because she does all of the work like cook the family tea and tidy up, general house chores to keep it intact. Another point the Marxists believe in is that the children accept capitalism and levels of hierarchy in society so there are lots of different roles and things like management so the parents are in charge and have the authority in the house hold and they teach them this is how life works and this is how the work place works, there is always going to be someone in authority and there is always going to be someone higher up than you and they have to accept this and follow the rules. This again links back to and backs up the original point that Marxists believe in a traditional family. According to Marxists families also believe in status inheritance. This theory was backed up in 1884 by Engel…

    • 653 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due to capitalism, both men and women have to work to support the family. Hochschild’s begins her article with Instant Quaker Oats cereal advertisement. “We see a mother pressing her son to eat more efficiently at home. This efficiency seeking in transferred from men to women, from the workplace to the home, and from adult to children” (184). In this advertisement, the mother makes the breakfast for her son within ninety seconds. This provides the mother more time to work and make money. By taking care the work and the family at the same time, women are gaining their social position. Financial independent makes women do not have to rely on men and they can make decisions that follow their wishes. The advertisement indicates that women are jumping from the frying pan of patriarchy into the fire of capitalism by taking care of their growing children and working at the same time. Women’s social statuses have changed significantly by having an efficiency lifestyle. Before, women’s roles are giving birth to children or taking care of families, but now working and making money to support families. In Kristof and WuDunn’s essay, she introduces “women aren’t the problem but the solution. The plight of girls in no more a tragedy than an opportunity” (209). Women need to receive more respect from society, and they can accomplish much more…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the family, feminists argue that during primary socialisation boys and girls are forced in to gender role stereotypes, for example, girls playing with toy cookers and baby dolls and boys playing with toy cars. Another way feminists argue that girls and boys are socialised in to gender roles is that typically girls are dressed in pink and boys are dressed in blue. This therefore prepares them girls for future life as a mother, who has responsibility of child care and housework while the man is the breadwinner. Feminists also argue society as being oppressive to women as childcare almost always falls on them. This is apparent in many family types and supported by the fact that almost all single parent families are run by the mother of the child and not the father, therefore restricting them to what they can do outside of the family. However functionalists would argue that feminists focus too much on the conflict within the family and not the positive functions that the family, nuclear in particular, produce. Feminists have also argued that the family is oppressive to women as it enables them to be subject to domestic violence. They argue that women are less likely to report any domestic abuse while in a marriage or cohabiting therefore enabling men to get away with it.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxists see all society’s institutions as helping to maintain class inequality and Capitalism. Therefore, the main contribution of Marxism to families and households has been to explain how the family functions to maintain the interests of the bourgeoisie, and maintain the Capitalist system. Marxists’ contributions have drawn much criticism from New Right and Functionalist sociologists, who question whether Marxism can help us to understand the family in contemporary society.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Women in the Soviet Union

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Working women in capitalist countries. Capitalist “democracy” has not and cannot give freedom to working and laboring women. Working women in all bourgeois countries are economically and politically enslaved. Middle class conventionality has a tenacious vice-grip on daily life. Advanced women workers and revolutionary women proletarians are persecuted. The most brutal blows of capitalist “rationalization,” unemployment, and hunger in the midst of plenty descend upon the female half of the proletariat. Fascism, Catholicism, and reformism with…

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marxist feminists use Marxist concepts to explain their belief that the family is actually leading to the exploitation of women. Women have certain roles in the family which aren’t being paid by the government and the Marxist feminists see this as women are getting abused. Such roles are the caring of their children, attending needs of the husband and serve as an emotional safety-valve for the husband from the frustration of work.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Office for National Statistics, research has shown that in 1996 there were 5,223 nuclear families and in 2012 the number of nuclear families has decreased to 4,610 families. It could be argued that the nuclear family is longer the norm because statistics even support this. One particular reason for this would be that the divorce rate has increased, research shows that now 40% of marriages now end in divorce. This would then leaned to lone-parent (single) families and reconstituted families. In the 1940s women were seen as housewives and mothers that didn’t have any other life, having an education was simply out of the question. Whereas women today go into much further education as men which therefore gives them a much higher status and independence. This may be the reason for why divorce rates have increased rapidly. The main reason for why women used to get married was to reproduce as they couldn’t do anything else other than that. Women had no financial support for which they had to rely on their husbands. In today’s society women don’t need any financial support as they are independent and self-reliant. Feminist’s state that they are exploited within the family, they are taken advantage of. They have to do all the housework,…

    • 2071 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics