Preview

factions by plato and madison

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
factions by plato and madison
Plato believed that the chief cause of factions is the difference in property owners. Recall that he said: "In each city there exists two cities; the city of the rich and the city of the poor - eternally at war."

Madison was similar in his belief though, he believed the primary cause of factions is the unequal distribution of property.

They each had their own set of solutions. Madison understands that factions cannot be eliminated (recall Federalist 10) where he provided the two methods in which they can be removed. First, one would have to destroy liberty - which is counter to a democratic society (and would not work). Second, he suggested that the only other way to destroy factions within a society was to provide each person with the same set of opinions, ideals, and beliefs. Again, counter to a free society.

Therefore the only way to redress factions is to control their effects. There are two ways he suggested to accomplish this. First, decentralize power at the national and state levels; spread the power out. Second, spread the middle class out (by encouraging land ownership) and encourage property ownership.

Plato had a different view. He thought factions should be eliminated. This could be accomplished by doing away with the current ruling class and using his theories cited in Plato's Communism.

Recall there are two main points to it: First, the society would be divided up into three classes: The Philosopher Kings (rulers), the Guardians (protectors), and the Merchants (middle class). The ruling class would no claim to private property. Also, they would live in barrack style accommodations and eat with other rulers at a common table.

The second point to Plato's idea is that marriage for the ruling class would be abolished as it is a distraction to governmental duties, according to Plato; an end to monogamous sexual relations for the ruling class. This would be replaced with selected breeding chosen by the ruling class in an attempt to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Madison, factions were caused by a few things. The first was the unequal distribution of property/wealth. Something else that caused factions was the fact that small groups were only for local issues/passions. Too many factions in a political party were dangerous, as each group believed a variety of different things. With many factions holding various opinions, this meant that no political party would have definite control of the government. This meant that the larger the faction, the more it could use its larger values and beliefs on others; merely because there are more people in a larger faction. Madison was against a majority rule. This is why Madison came to the conclusion that…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP Government

    • 477 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6. According to Madison in Federalist Paper No. 10, why is the Federal Government a solution to the problem in curbing factions?…

    • 477 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why did Madison believe that the “spirit of party and faction” would have a negative impact on the government? Madison said, “that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties.” This means that a group cannot become too big and cause a distraction among the other group. 4.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    POLS Assignment 1

    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Federalist paper 10 Madison argues that if an extended republic was set up including a multiplicity of economic, geographic, social, religious, and sectional interests, these interests, by checking each other, would prevent American society from being divided into the clashing armies of the rich and the poor. Thus, if no interstate proletariat could become organized on purely economic lines, the property of the rich would be safe even though the mass of the people held political power. His solution for the class struggle was not to set up an absolute and irresponsible state to regiment society from above; he was never willing to sacrifice liberty to gain security. He wished to multiply the deposits of political power in the state itself sufficiently to break down the sole dualism of rich and poor and thus to guarantee both liberty and security.…

    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison made his concern of tyranny known especially in the 10th Federalist Paper, with some mention in his other papers, and writings including the Constitution in which his contributions were heavily influenced by his concerns. Factions were a legitimate threat, and the greatest of the potential evils for the United States because the good of the public would be disregarded by the majority faction, and they would make hasty decisions that would harm the country. The greatest cause for factions as described by Madison in the tenth federalist paper is different degrees of possession of…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison defines factions as a group of people united by a common interest. Madison thinks the cause of factions were unequal distribution of property. Madison felt that factions would lead to tyranny by the majority. He said there are two ways to eliminate the negative effects of a faction; first being to eliminate common interest which is impossible, the second being to increase the republic so majority factions cant be formed so easily.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison states, "The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man," (Madison, Paragraph 5) so the solution is to control their effects. He makes an argument on how this is not feasible in a moral democracy but practical in a republic. Effects of a faction vary depending on whether the faction is a majority or minority faction. Madison argues that the only strenuous effects to control will come from majority factions. He states that the concept of popular sovereignty should keep minority factions from acquiring an influence. “But the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society” (Madison, Paragraph 5). However he argues that undesirable passions can spread from a small size to a majority faction fairly quickly. “. The regulation of these various and interfering interests forms the principal task of modern legislation, and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of the government” (Madison, Paragraph…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of a faction by Madison is a certain number of inhabitants, regardless of whether they are the minority or majority, whose union exists because of shared passions, or interests, these interest are in contrast to the rights of other citizens. Madison takes a stance that there exist two methods for limiting damages from the factions that are the removal of the causes of the faction or having control over the camps. He proceeds further and says that there are two ways of eliminating the factions. One being the elimination of liberty which is an unacceptable action and creation of a similar opinion and interest in the society that is practically impossible since the cause of the factions is as a result of freedom in the society Madison makes a conclusion that limitation of the damages from the factions is through control of their effects.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison begins his famous Federalist 10 paper by stating that a strong argument in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it creates a government in control of the chaos, violence, and destruction caused by the factions in society. James Madison defines a faction as group of people who collectively work together to protect and promote their own economic interests and political opinions. In my opinion, these factions are inevitable, and this because of human nature and attraction theory. When people hold certain ideologies, possess specific amounts of wealth, and possess different amounts of property, they will most likely associate themselves with people who are most similar to them. Factions in society are completely opposite and…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Maddison

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Federalist Paper number ten, James Madison talks about the situation at the time regarding Factions. Maddison mainly focused on how to end the influx of factions, but nearly every single course of action he proposed, seemed too impractical or downright moronic to follow through with. Factions are impossible to stop within a democracy because they are the reason the democracy stays strong, rather than be destroyed. In order for a democracy to flourish, the ideas and changes voted for by the majority of the people must be upheld, and in order for this to happen, factions have to rise up and shed light on issues in the current system. Instead of writing on how to remove validity from these groups, Maddison should instead have focused on how to better use these factions in order to strengthen the democratic views.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato bases his argument on Athens and what his own personal experience with democracy. Professor Samons makes an interesting point when he says that after watching…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By looking at oligarchy, democracy and military governments developed from overrule of tyrants from the Archaic to the Classical periods, it is apparent that Greece was in need of political unification.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato has an aversion to democracy because it violates the proper order of society by creating an artificial equality. His basic criticism is that democracy is an irrational form of constitution. It is based on the assumption that every citizen is equally entitled to a say in political affairs, no matter how unsuited he is in terms of ability, character or training. In this form of democracy, it doesn’t matter how ignorant a person is, he could still play a significant role in public affairs if he speaks persuasively enough. Plato was disgusted by the idea of a system where value and merit are disregarded and instead unconditional equality. He and Socrates both felt that all people were born with knowledge, but that not all people were in touch with the knowledge they possessed. Plato rejected the idea that all men are equals. Plato also believed that man was not self-sufficient; he believed man would be most happy living in a state, being ruled over. It seems that he also believed all men wanted to live the truly good life where they could be in tune with the truth and achieve their ultimate goals. When discussing a democratic society and its leaders, Plato says, “When a democracy which is thirsting for freedom has evil cupbearers presiding over the feast, and has drunk too deeply the strong wine of freedom, then, unless her rulers are very amenable and give a plentiful draught, she calls them to account and punishes them, and says…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays