Face It: the Impact of Gender on Social Media Images
Communication Quarterly Vol. 60, No. 5, November–December 2012, pp. 588–607
Face it: The Impact of Gender on Social Media Images
Jessica Rose, Susan Mackey-Kallis, Len Shyles, Kelly Barry, Danielle Biagini, Colleen Hart, & Lauren Jack
Social websites like Facebook enable users to upload self-created digital images; it is therefore of interest to see how gender is performed in this domain. A panel used a literature review of pictorial features associated with gender traits, and a sample of Facebook pictures to assess gender stereotypes present in Facebook images. Traits emerging in greater prominence in pictures of males included active, dominant, and independent. Those prominent with female users included attractive and dependent. These findings generally conform to gender stereotypes found in prior research and extend the research regarding stereotypical gender traits displayed in professional media depictions to self-selected social media displays. They also extend the research on gender differences in impression management generally, in both interpersonal communication and social media, to include gender-specific traits that are part of young mens and women’s impression management. Keywords: Facebook; Gender Display; Impression Management; Role Theory; Social Media
Jessica Rose (B.A., Villanova University, 2011) is a marketing and communications professional in the Greater Philadelphia Area. Susan Mackey-Kallis (Ph.D., Penn State University, 1986) is an associate professor in the Department of Communication at Villanova University. Len Shyles (Ph.D., Ohio State University, 1981) is an associate professor in the Department of Communication at Villanova University. Kelly Barry (B.A., Villanova University, 2011) is a marketing and communications professional in the Greater New York area. Danielle Biagini (B.A., Villanova University, 2011) is a marketing and communications professional in the Greater San Diego area. Colleen Hart (B.A., Villanova University, 2011)
Face it: The Impact of Gender on Social Media Images
Jessica Rose, Susan Mackey-Kallis, Len Shyles, Kelly Barry, Danielle Biagini, Colleen Hart, & Lauren Jack
Social websites like Facebook enable users to upload self-created digital images; it is therefore of interest to see how gender is performed in this domain. A panel used a literature review of pictorial features associated with gender traits, and a sample of Facebook pictures to assess gender stereotypes present in Facebook images. Traits emerging in greater prominence in pictures of males included active, dominant, and independent. Those prominent with female users included attractive and dependent. These findings generally conform to gender stereotypes found in prior research and extend the research regarding stereotypical gender traits displayed in professional media depictions to self-selected social media displays. They also extend the research on gender differences in impression management generally, in both interpersonal communication and social media, to include gender-specific traits that are part of young mens and women’s impression management. Keywords: Facebook; Gender Display; Impression Management; Role Theory; Social Media
Jessica Rose (B.A., Villanova University, 2011) is a marketing and communications professional in the Greater Philadelphia Area. Susan Mackey-Kallis (Ph.D., Penn State University, 1986) is an associate professor in the Department of Communication at Villanova University. Len Shyles (Ph.D., Ohio State University, 1981) is an associate professor in the Department of Communication at Villanova University. Kelly Barry (B.A., Villanova University, 2011) is a marketing and communications professional in the Greater New York area. Danielle Biagini (B.A., Villanova University, 2011) is a marketing and communications professional in the Greater San Diego area. Colleen Hart (B.A., Villanova University, 2011)
References: Bell, P., & Milic, M. (2002). Goffman’s gender advertisements revisited: Combining content analysis with semiotic analysis. Visual Communication, 1, 203–222. doi: 10.1177= 147035720200100205 Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67–92. Bruckman, A. (1993). Gender swapping on the Internet. Paper presented at The Internet Society, Reston, VA. Buffardi, L., & Campbell, K. (2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1303–1314. Burr, V. (2002). The person in social psychology (psychology focus). New York: Taylor & Francis. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge. Cho, H. J. (2006). (The) study of communication pattern and interpersonal relationship in cyberspace: Focusing on users of Cyworld (in Korean). Yonsei Univ. Dissertation. Chu, J. Y., Porche, M., & Tolman, D. (2005). The adolescent masculinity ideology in relationships scale: Development and validation of a new measure for boys. Men & Masculinities, 8, 93–115. doi: 10.1177=1097184X03257453 Dominick, J. R. (1999). Who do you think you are? Personal home pages and self-presentation on the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 646–658. doi: 10.1177=107769909907600403 Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. doi: 10.1037= 0022-3514.46.4.735 Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in modern life. New York: Basic Books. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday & Co. Goffman, E. (1976). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row. Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59, 367–386. doi: 10.1111=j.1460-2466.2009.01420.x Heintz-Knowles, K., Henderson, J., Glaubke, C., Miller, P., Parker, M. A., & Espejo, E. (2001). Fair play? Violence, Gender and Race in Videogames. Oakland, CA: Children Now. Jones, S. G. (1997). The Internet and its social landscape. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity & communication in cybersociety (pp. 7–35). London: Sage. Lauzen, M. M., Dozier, D. M., & Horan, N. (2008). Constructing gender stereotypes through social roles in prime-time television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 200–214. doi: 10.1080=08838150801991971 Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-presentation. Boulder, CO: Westview. Mills, J. (1984). Self-posed behaviors of females and males in photographs. Sex Roles, 10, 633–637. doi: 10.1007=BF00287270 Oh, W. W. (2004). A study of self-presentation in cyberspace—Based on Cyworld users in 20s. Dissertation for the master in Yonsei University, The United Graduate School of Theology Pastoral, Counseling Dept. of Practical Theology. Ragan, J. (1982). Gender displays in portrait photographs. Sex Roles, 8, 33–43. doi: 10.1007= BF00287672 Rettberg, J. W. (2009). ‘‘Freshly generated for you, and Barack Obama’’: How social media represent your life. European Journal of Communication, 24, 451–466. doi: 10.1177=0267323109345715 Roberts, L. D., & Parks, M. R. (1999). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Intemet. Information, Communication, and Society, 2, 521–540. doi: 10.1080= 136911899359538 Communication Quarterly 607 Robinson, T., Callister, M., Clark, B., & Phillips, J. (2008). Violence, sexuality, and gender stereotyping: A content analysis of official video game web sites. Web Journal of Mass Communication Research, 13, 131–147. Samp, J., Wittenberg, E. M., & Gillett, D. L. (2003). Presenting and monitoring a gender-defined self on the Internet. Communication Research Reports, 20, 1–12. doi: 10.1080= 08824090309388794 Strano, M. M. (2008). User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through Facebook profile Images. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2), article 5. Retrieved from http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2008110402&article=5 Suler, J. (1999). Psychology of cyberspace. Retrieved from www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/ Taylor, T. L. (1999). Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities, and other online research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 436–449. doi: 10.1177= 00027649921955362 Valkenburg, P., Schouten, A., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet. New Media & Society, 7, 383–402. doi: 10.1177=1461444805052282 Walther, J. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381–398. doi: 10.1080=10570319309374463 Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21, 460–487. doi: 10.1177=009365094021004002 Wanta, W., & Legett, D. (1989). Gender stereotypes in wire service sports photos. Newspaper Research Journal, 10, 105–114. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi: 10.1177=0891243287001002002 Wilbur, S. P. (1996). An archaeology of cyberspaces: Virtuality, community, identity. In D. Porter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp. 5–22). New York: Routledge. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study (cross-cultural research and methodology series 8). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Witmer, D. F., & Katzman, S. L. (1997). Smile when you say that: Graphic accents as gender markers in computer-mediated communication. In F. Sudweeks, M. McLaughlin & S. Rafaeli (Eds.), Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the Internet (pp. 3–12). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. Wood, J. T. (2009). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Copyright of Communication Quarterly is the property of Eastern Communication Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder 's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.