Preview

Exceptions To The Criminal Justice System

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Exceptions To The Criminal Justice System
Should the criminal justice system exceptions in application of law?
It’s not fair to punish someone if they did something by accident or punishing a kid for doing something that he didn’t know was wrong. On the other hand, it’s a different story if they did it on purpose or if they knew it was wrong, and the person still chose to do it. For those reasons, the United States criminal justice system should allow exceptions in application of law. One topic of exceptions made to the criminal justice system is mentally challenged adolescents or adults. If a disabled person committed a crime that they didn’t intend to do/, should they have the same consequence of a person that intentionally committed the same crime? For instance, in the book “Of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dame Elizabeth Butler Sloss Case Analysis
    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dame Elizabeth Butler Sloss Case Analysis

    In the issue of the unfairness in the law this can be seen. This is supported by the case of Brendan Dassey being forced into being charged for a crime he did not commit. In this case a 16 year old boy - Brendan Dassey is said to be an accomplice to a murder. The accused murder is Steven Avery, Dassey’s uncle. Dassey has learning disabilities and can only read at a fourth-grade level. Dassey is then interrogated alone, and then possibly forced by the police into confessing to rape and murder. He then abandons his statement but due to his unresolved confession he is sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder that his uncle committed. This case shows how the legal system is not entirely correct and was unfair towards Dassey. It also displays the importance of legal support for people with mental disabilities need in the legal system. Whilst this case was in America in Australia it is still just as relevant. This can be backed up by the idea that if an accused person has cognitive disabilities they can be held indefinitely after they are found to be unfit to stand trial. These people can still held accountable for crimes even though they weren't guilty of committing them. This shows that there is a severe issue of unfairness within the Australian legal…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study
    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    It was noted that while juveniles are capable of committing truly heinous crimes, they are not fully culpable for three main reasons. The first reason discussed was that juveniles under the age of eighteen lack the maturity and responsibility that adults have attained. This shortcoming causes decisions and subsequent actions to be poorly thought out. Basically, juveniles are not responsible decision makers. This idea was supported by the fact that most states do not allow minors to vote, do jury duty, or get married without consent. The second rationale for why juveniles are less culpable than adults dealt with environment. It was suggested that juveniles lack control over their environment. They do not have the ability to remove themselves from an environment that encourages delinquency. Finally, juveniles are less culpable because they are still developing a sense of self identity. This suggests that behaviors exhibited now may not be part of their character in five or ten years, allowing for recovery. The majority then argued that the same reasoning they used in Stanford v. Kentucky applied to Roper v. Simmons, and that the eighth amendment did not allow for the execution of people under age eighteen due to lesser culpability (Counsel of Record,…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Exclusionary Rule In The Justice System
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Exclusionary Rule In The Justice System

    A major case that helped further clarify the exclusionary rule in the justice system was the Davis v. The United States. The case regarded the admissibility of evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches and seizures derived from the fourth amendment. The implications for law enforcement and prosecution were also clarified by the exclusionary rule during the trial. Case Background Willie Davis was stopped by officers at a routine vehicle stop where he was asked for his name and decided to give a false name. Once the officers saw that Davis had given them a false name, he was arrested, and officers decided to search his vehicle.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mark George The Significance Of The Eight Amendment
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mark George The Significance Of The Eight Amendment

    Mark George indicates in his article The Relevance of The Eight Amendment to the US Death Penalty in the 21st Century, that people with mental retardation faced high risks of wrongful convictions because they might make wrongful of false confessions. The case of Atkins v. Virginia is a clear example of cruel and unusual punishment. In 1996, the American Association of Mental Retardation declared Atkins mentally incapable. However, the court sentenced him to capital punishment. It wasn’t until 2001 that Atkins was exonerated of capital punishment due to his mental condition.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crj 316 Criminal Sentencing Research Paper
    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crj 316 Criminal Sentencing Research Paper

    Sentences for crimes committed have been handed down for as long as there have been crimes to commit. There are many factors to be considered by the judge tasked with sentencing in a criminal case, including an offender’s criminal history and actual involvement in the commission of the offense. First-time offenders may be grated leniency in sentencing, but it can be argued that such a practice is contrary to the nature of punishment and detracts from the effects of the crime on the victims. Punishment serves three general purposes that serve to benefit the victim, the public, and the offender: retribution, prevention, and rehabilitation.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Law Paper
    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Criminal Law Paper

    The legal issue present in this case is if sentencing a 14-year-old to life in prison without parole is considered as cruel and unusual punishment. Miller appealed his case on the grounds that his conviction violated both the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. To back his claims, Miller presented the cases of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 560, which holds that "a minor cannot be sentenced to death and that a minor cannot be imprisoned for life for a non-homicidal crime, respectively, as evidence that his conviction contravenes nationally held standards of decency" (Cornell University Law School, 2012).…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Law and Federal Justice System in the U.S.

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criminal Law and Federal Justice System in the U.S.

    Unlicensed prizefights and similar activities of a sporting nature where the players consent and the audience actively approves of what they see.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Forms Of Injustice In Criminal Justice
    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Three Forms Of Injustice In Criminal Justice

    In this paper, I will discuss three forms of injustice or bias in the American corrections system as it applies to differing branches of government and criminal justice. First, intermediate sentencing for non-violent offenders and why it should be expanded. Second, Political bias in the judicial system in regards to light sentences to violent offenders. Lastly, I will discuss the pardon power of the executive branch politicians in our society and how it can be unjust due to bias.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults Essay
    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults Essay

    Juveniles should not be let off easy because it increase that chances of it occurring again because they did not receive the punishment. The consequences of a juvenile's action should not be determined by race, ethnicity, gender and color of skin as well as economic status. We shouldn’t their enablers, we should let know and experience that every single action has it’s consequence. If teens can plan a murder confess it and not feel any remorse they should also be given the proper punishment and face time in prison. I do not think it is wrong, I believe that it is just to trial a juvenile as an…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sentencing Children In Jail
    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page

    Sentencing Children In Jail

    I like the ruling is far because children do not always completely understand the consequences of their actions. Sentencing a child without parole is taking their freedom away. They need to pay for their actions but sentencing them like that is wrong because they need help and not time in jail. Putting the children in jail will not help the problem instead they should be place in a special program to help them understand what they did is wrong and how to deal with it. Another aspect to consider is why did they commit the act? Was it because they were abused or someone made them? No matter how horrible the act the child commit, they still are children and need help.In the case of Alabama I feel like the boys did know what they were doing and…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice System Remains Unfair
    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal Justice System Remains Unfair

    Is there times where you didn’t receive the justice that you deserved? The justice system is not fair like the government says it is. The rich people use money to help influence decisions. There is still racism in our justice system that put people in jail that don’t belong there. Corrupt people could become judges or police officers that don’t give fair decisions. Not all trials are fair because there is bias in America's justice system.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Flaws In The Criminal Justice System
    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Flaws In The Criminal Justice System

    Everyday 2,220,300 inmates live their lives in prisons throughout the United States. That’s 0.91% of the adult population, or 1 in 110 (Glaze 2013). What if you were next? The thought would scare anyone and the flaws in the system pose a threat to low income individuals and minorities. The sole purpose of the Justice System is to deliver justice for all, by only convicting and sentencing the guilty, while preventing offenders from reoffending. The system was designed to protect the innocent. What if that was not the case? In fact, Out of the 733,000 people held in local jails at this time, 2/3 of them have not been convicted and many are there simply…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Discretion In The Criminal Justice System
    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Discretion In The Criminal Justice System

    Discussions in how discretion is exercised in the legal profession often raises debate in the criminal justice system. Discretion is vastly misused in many of the criminal justice fields. Areas such as youth justice, sentencing, policing, and a host of many other legal fields need better understanding, interpretation and communication. As with many practices, the object of measuring these areas is to understand constraints on its use and areas where it can be regulated better. This paper will reflect the role of discretion and how it is conceived in the justice system. In addition, this paper will examine how individuals elect to measure legal discretion from the public’s point of view as often the public sees only the negative terms of it.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Insanity Defense
    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Insanity Defense

    Vatz, Richard E. "Mentally Ill Offenders Should Be Held Responsible for Their Actions." Crime and Criminals. Ed. James D. Torr. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 21 Nov. 2010.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics