Preview

Ethical Considerations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
655 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Considerations
Ethical Considerations for the Investigator and Prosecutor in Homicide and Rape The investigator and prosecutor play very critical roles, roles that are only fairly fulfilled if all parties are as ethical as possible. Failing to act ethically can lose a case, set a criminal free or could even mean someone innocent going to prison. While ethics in every single type of case are important we are going to examine homicide and rape. Both homicide and rape leave the public hungry for answers. We must be sure that finding those answers are done ethically from the crime scene to trial.
The Investigator
Ethical Considerations From the moment the investigator gets a case professionalism, knowledge of laws and procedure is what has to
…show more content…
The investigator must remember to handle witnesses and evidence in a professional way. “The investigator must be sensitive to the constitutional and civil rights of all: rich or poor, witness or suspect.” (Osterburg & Ward, 2010, p. 9)The investigator must have a “sensitivity to people’s feelings (especially important for rape cases); act with discretion and tact; respects a confidence.” (Osterburg & Ward, 2010, p. 11) The investigator must be knowledgeable in current laws to ensure all evidence is obtained in a lawful …show more content…
255) In both homicide or rape cases the prosecutor has to be able to evaluate the cases objectively and not get emotionally involved. “As courts, commentators, and professional codes consistently declare, the role of a prosecutor is not to win a case (and achieve professional and media acclaim) but, rather, to behave in a fair and lawful manner to promote the cause of justice. This requirement to serve justice means that in order to achieve a fair and just result, a prosecutor must, again, exercise powers in an objectively fair and disinterested manner without any implication of partiality that might tarnish integrity” (Gershman,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecution Vs. Defense

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A prosecutor’s primary role is that of a minister of justice, and not simply that of an advocate in guarding the rights of the accused as well as enforcing the rights of the public (Tragos, n.d.). Of course, as a minister of justice and not that of an advocate, a prosecutor possesses the power of operating with few legal constraints regarding decision making, which accounts for the use of discretion. In contrast, defense counsel represent the accused of society, the role of the defense…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROFESSIONAL MUST MAINTAIN HIS OR HER INTEGRITY BY REMAING A CREDIBLE AT ALL TIMES. RESEARCH INTEGRITY ISSUES IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROFESSION OF YOUR CHOICE AND DISCUSS THREE ISSUES THAT COULD COMPROMISE ONE’S CREDIBILITY AND HOW TO AVOID SUCH PROFESSIONAL PITFALLS…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prosecutor must also consider the views of the victim in regard to the impact of the offence. With sexual offences the safety of victim and children must be considered.…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is accountable for exhibiting the state’s evidence as well as presenting and preparing the state’s case against the accused. It is also the prosecuting attorneys responsibility to decide which matters should be tried or not. It is the prosecutor who makes these determinations based on a several sets of criteria. Most prosecutors will study the evidence against the accused, study the crime, as well as many other factors.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. In your opinion, what are the three most important skills for a forensic investigator regarding expert witness testimony? Why?…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the states evidence and preparing the states case against the accused. It is up to the prosecuting attorney to determine which cases should be pursued and which to let the charges drop. The prosecutor makes these decisions based on a variety of criteria. They will look at the evidence against the accused, the crime itself, the history of the accused as well as many other factors.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Forensic psychology is a field that combines both psychology and the law. Advancements in technology have accelerated created tremendous popularity for this science. Furthermore the media, who has become obsessed with forensics, through television shows movies and books, depicting heroes solving mysteries in under an hour. While depictions of forensic psychologist are popular and dramatic, the media does not portray an accurate definition of this science. Typically, a forensic psychologist deals with both areas: psychology and law. In many cases, people working within forensic psychology are not necessarily “forensic psychologists.” These individuals might be school psychologists, neurologist or counselors who lend their psychological experience to provide testimony, analysis or recommendations in legal or criminal cases.Forensic psychologists usually deals with clients who are not there of their own free will. Due to this forensic psychologist face great difficulty in making assessments, diagnosis and treatment plans. (Cherry, 2009)…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The domain of prosecutors has been extended to provide greater authority. An example of domain expansion of the prosecutors is improving police-prosecutors relationships. Truthfully, police officers and prosecutors are looked at as the bad guys in the eyes of the public. They are both to serve justice, even though they have different perspectives on the law. For example, the police officers consider a case to be closed when the suspect is arrest, but the prosecutor needs obtain more information and evidence to win the case in court. Prosecutors depend off of the police to obtain a conviction; this all depends on how the police officers investigate and the quality of their arrests. Although both police officers and prosecutors have sought strategies…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “ Case screening is the gateway to the criminal justice system. Prosecutors, acting as gatekeepers, decide which instances of alleged victimization will be passed on for adjudication by the courts” (Frohmann, 1991, p. 213). As Supreme Court Justice Jackson acknowledged in 1940, “the prosecutor has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America” (Davis, 1969, p.190). Frohmann examined the powerful discretion prosecutors have in their justification for sexual assault case rejections in her research article, Discrediting Victim’s allegations of Sexual Assault: Prosecutorial Accounts of Case Rejections. Her research was replicated and extended in a 2001 study by Spohn, Beichner, and Davis-Frenzil titled Prosecutorial Justifications for Sexual Assault Case Rejection: Guarding the “Gateway to Justice”.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are three main roles that a prosecutor utilizes. These are as follows; investigating crimes, evaluating them to determine whether a legal proceeding should be initiation on the basis of the available evidence or not and then appearing in the courtroom. The prosecutor uses the prosecutorial discretion process. Through this process, the prosecutor evaluates filed charges and corresponding testimonies and evidence before…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In United States Criminal Justice System, all criminal cases need the Participation of the judge, counsel for the prosecution, and the counsel for the accused. Criminal justice system is incomplete with either of them not being present. Prosecutors value their power to seek justice for an accused person but sometimes they use it dishonestly. Prosecutors have so much power that they sometimes take advantage of and engage in misconduct.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecutorial Discretion is the prosecuting attorney having complete authority on the turnout of a case. The prosecuting attorney has discretionary power over matters that involve "whether or not to bring criminal charges, deciding the nature of the charges, plea bargaining, and sentence recommendation" (U.S. Legal Inc, 2016, p. 1). Prosecutors are not obligated to take a victims accusations and represent it in front of a jury. However, the prosecutor is obligated to listen to the story, analyze the evidence, and then decide if they want to move ahead with the case (Bazelon, 2006, p. 2). The discretion comes into action when the prosecutor has analyzed the evidence and learns whether or not the case can be won with the evidence provided.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kathryn’s duty to do justice as the prosecutor, also applies during plea bargaining, whereby, a persons guilt must be established based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, the prosecutor’s primary objective “is to avoid punishing an innocent person. Because a prosecutor is obligated to act in all stages in the criminal justice process consistently with the sovereign's view that it is more important to avoid punishing the innocent, this principle applies to a prosecutor's efforts in resolving cases pre-trial” (Stern 1034). Regardless of how confident the prosecutor is of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor must ensure he does not offer a plea bargain that would result in an innocent individual to plead guilty as such an offer would subordinate the purpose of preventing an innocent individual from being punished to that of punishing a guilty individual, “thereby failing to strike the balance that justice requires” (Stern 1035). O’Hear suggests that a defendant should have the opportunity to convey their side of the story in order for the defendant to avoid getting convicted if they are innocent. It would also be beneficial to enhance the defendants perceptions of procedural justice by developing an objective criteria in order to direct plea negotiations and explain the prosecutors…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition of Evidence

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The prosecutor must determine what evidence needs to be introduced, but also how that evidence is produced and consider the appropriate time in which to display evidence throughout the trial.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is the Right Choice

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is ethics? Dictionary.com describes ethics are moral principles that govern a person’s or groups behavior. Ethics is very essential, especially in the criminal justice field. With the situation that was given, I would comply with the choice of challenging my partner about what happened in the interview room. Even though no one is perfect and mistakes are bound to happen, rules are rules. By law my partner, was suppose to wait before interviewing the minors or in this case could be suspects, until their mothers arrived. Also, recording without parents consent could leave to having case thrown out of case to due to the lack of procedures’ leading in the investigation. There needs to factual information, to prove the suspect guiltiness. How do we know that someone else committed the crime and is about to get away with it? All of this goes back to the rules, and ethics. Every officer should know the ethics, after signing the criminal Justice Code of Ethics form. This form stresses the importance of dignity, obedience, confidentiality, conflict of internet, ethical pluralism, not include private life issues, and having integrities. . Dignity is self respect or pride.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays