Preview

Courtroom Players Response

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
328 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courtroom Players Response
Courtroom Players Response
Oscar Bishop
CJS 200
Professor Pat Gebhart
05/01/2013

In the courtroom there is a group of key players that work together on a daily basis. They are made of a group of professionals. These professional are those who know all aspects of a criminal trial and they work together in performing the duties of the court.
The courtroom work group is all of the professionals that participate in a court proceeding. They include the judge, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders and any other individuals who earn a living by giving service to the court. These individuals act together with a common goal of bringing any and all court room proceedings to a successful close. Each of professional in the courtroom work group has it's own duties. The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the states evidence and preparing the states case against the accused. It is up to the prosecuting attorney to determine which cases should be pursued and which to let the charges drop. The prosecutor makes these decisions based on a variety of criteria. They will look at the evidence against the accused, the crime itself, the history of the accused as well as many other factors.
If the criteria where more strict which would end up in fewer cases being prosecuted, the court would be less crowded for time but there would be more criminals on the streets going unpunished. On the other hand if they were too loose, there would be a risk of more innocent people being charged with crimes they didn't commit and an already overtaxed court system becoming completely bogged down.
I would not really recommend any changes in the court system that we have now. I understand it is not a perfect system but it is better than many and it has the right goals in mind.

Reference:
Schmalleger, F. (2011). Criminal justice today: An introductory text for the twenty-first century (11th ed.). Upper

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The courtroom workgroup consists of the participants that work for the court. The workgroup is composed of the judge, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others that work for the court, such as the clerk and the court reporter. The judge has overall control of the courtroom and the workgroup. The judge is responsible for keeping the order and deciding guilt or innocents of the accused. The courtroom workgroup interacts daily in many ways. It is the responsibility of the judge to oversee all that goes on within the courtroom and ensure that rights are not violated as well as rule on each case that is put before them. The defense attorneys, prosecuting attorneys, and the public defenders, help paint a picture if you will for the judge of what happened. The judge then interprets the information he or she is given to determine guilt or innocence without bias ensuring that the accused receives a fair trial. The courtroom workgroup functions well, needing no major changes.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Lawyers who work within the parameters of the courtroom work group receive benefits for their clients, including more case information from prosecutors and perhaps better plea bargains. Lawyers who are less cooperative find that they do not get favorable case-scheduling considerations and get less favorable plea bargains.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The courtroom work group is known to keep the courtroom in order, and to successfully help bring the procedure to a close. Courtroom work groups are made up of professionals such as a judge, prosecutor, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others such as bailiff and court reporters. These players work together and help to prosecute those who’ve committed crimes for the overall wellbeing of society. This work group also serves to deter criminals from becoming repeat offenders, or from committing other crimes. The most important function of the courtroom work group is to make sure that the court is responsible for using laws created by the government to help the wellbeing of the citizens within society. In some cases, similar beliefs help the courtroom work group to carry out certain sentencing. Haynes (2010) “In addition, the relationships between individuals involved in sentencing—the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorney—may be important because of shared beliefs about what constitutes appropriate sentencing. These individuals, who together form the courtroom workgroup, share a common task environment and work together to achieve the common goal of disposing of cases.”…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States court system is composed of numerous sections of bodies of law that function together to ensure justness is served in fulfillment with the United States Constitution, federal, state and local laws. These organizations include law enforcement, the courts and, correction system all of which have a legitimate responsibility to maintain the American Peoples trust. I am a strong advocate for our court system, although it can use some fine-tuning every level of Justice could stand some improvement but that takes time, commitment and the right officials in office.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observation

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Liberty University presented a case of White v. Gibbs which is about Mrs. Debbie White and Patrick Gibbs under the civil provisions of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act, Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. In this case Mrs. Debbie White sued Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Because White and Gibbs do not live in the same states, the suit was brought in diversity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. However, the suit will be decided under Indiana state law. The main goal of this courtroom is to argue the motion for summary judgment which is concerning the case of Mrs. Debbie White, Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. In this case, the plaintiff is Debbie White. Two moot court attorneys who are Amanda Babbitt and Jack Walsh represent Mrs. White. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Also two other moot court attorneys who are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter represent the defendants which are Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Obersvation

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The 2008 2L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law presented a case which was argued before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, case number 82A04-8876-CV-285, Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C., d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern.…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the prosecutor and the defense attorney are competent of handling ample discretion within their proper duties. The prosecutor could be considered to have appropriate capabilities at their availability which feature fewer restrictions compared to the discretional capabilities of the defense attorney. The prosecutor handles abundant discretion in deciding whether to originally go after a case and immediately charge the accused. They may find what to offer the defense when a plea bargain is settled and have the power to drop and re-file charges when it is appropriate to do so. Prosecutors may be engaged in horizontal prosecution or where there are several prosecutors may be assigned to the case throughout each legal stage, or vertical prosecution, where there will be a single prosecutor following the case through each legal stage (Meyer & Grant, 2003).…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Virginia State, Jay Lentz was convicted by a jury in July 2003 for the kidnapping and murder of his wife. The jury recommended that Mr. Lentz spend life in prison; however, the United States District Judge Gerald Lee dismissed the kidnapping charge due to lack of evidence. Two weeks after the judge convicted Mr. Lentz of murder, he found evidence of prosecutorial misconduct therefore the judge ordered a new trial for the alleged murder charge.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Courtroom workgroups consist of a judge, a prosecutor, and a defense. These courtroom groups remain Senior Officers in court who determines the appropriateness of conduct. These officers settle questions of evidence and rule on procedures. The officers also have to guide questioning of witnesses during extensive control of the courts while deciding if to hold complainant the sentences of defendants. The jury remains instructed on conduct, verdict, and relevant law (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cja Courtsystems

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | |In other words, the prosecutor is the one who |whatever the crime is. Basically the prosecution is |…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Workgroups

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The courtroom work group has to work together to ensure all procedures are being followed and ensure the rights and safety of those in the courtroom. Each role in the courtroom communicates to each other to offer plea bargains, choose jurors, get witnesses called to testify, and review evidence. The role of the prosecutor is to represent the government or interests of the community in a criminal trial. The codes and standards that are in place are the duty to seek justice above the importance of obtaining a conviction. The prosecutor is responsible for proving the accused of legal guilt.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Work Groups

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I found several responses to the question of who is included in the courtroom work group. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each individual group but also to make sure it is given in a timely manner. The courtroom work group needs to communicate in order to offer plea bargains and choose jurors.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    courtroom between the victim, and the courts process itself. There are two pieces of literature used…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In The United States criminal justice system, a Courtroom Workgroup is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. This foundational concept in the academic discipline of criminal justice, recharacterizes the seemingly adversarial courtroom participants as collaborators in "doing justice." The courtroom workgroup was proposed by Eisenstein and Jacob in 1977 to explain their observations of the ways courts, especially lower level courts, actually come to decisions. ("Courtroom Workgroup", n.d.)…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The courtroom work group is composed of various people who make the court systems work to the best of their ability. Each person has its position, and she/he is responsible for their part. We can start from the top, first we have a Judge, he/she is responsible for imposing the proper judging techniques in the courtroom, and they are to make sure the accused rights are not violated in the courtroom. Then we have a defense attorney, and the defense attorney is to defend his client against any wrongdoing by the court and prove his client is innocent of the charges being brought to him/her.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays