Ethical Approach To Hunting
in Approach to Hunting
The people who have never hunted or are too squimmish to harvest for their own may conseive that hunting is cruel and excrutiating for wildlife. However, the dudy of a hunter is to end its life quickly and harvest the animal. To achieve this task the hunter will pratice his marksmanship and utalize his equipment to ensure that his prey ends humainely as possible. This way of death is a lot better than the slaughterhouses and what mother nature can offer.
Hunting is not for the squimmish, but the squimmish must realize the morals of the hunter and the buisness of the poacher.
First off i have a beef with People for the ethical treatment of animals (PETA). This volenteer organization likes to spread fear to the media into knowing that animals are being consumed by people or the mistreating of animals. But the irony of PETAS organiation is that their protesting leads to many deaths of animals to prove a point, as long as animal meat is not consumed by humans. But when PETA gets involved with trying to compare hunters and poachers with the same purpose, thats when hunters like me must educate the …show more content…
Hunters obey the laws enacted to protect the animals including game and non game animals. Hunters respect the animal they are hunting. It is fair chase and the animal becomes food for the Hunter and his/her family. Like it or not, we by nature are predators. AS of nowhunters, are the most efficient way to keep animal population under control. Since we have intruded into the animals area, there is less room and natural food for large populations. Larger populations means disease and hunger. Poachers kill animals illegally. They do not obey the laws. They kill for profit because some PEOPLE like to buy the tusk, furs, etc of non game and protected animals. Don't put the blame on Hunters, but the buisness owners that finance the Poachers with their illegal
The people who have never hunted or are too squimmish to harvest for their own may conseive that hunting is cruel and excrutiating for wildlife. However, the dudy of a hunter is to end its life quickly and harvest the animal. To achieve this task the hunter will pratice his marksmanship and utalize his equipment to ensure that his prey ends humainely as possible. This way of death is a lot better than the slaughterhouses and what mother nature can offer.
Hunting is not for the squimmish, but the squimmish must realize the morals of the hunter and the buisness of the poacher.
First off i have a beef with People for the ethical treatment of animals (PETA). This volenteer organization likes to spread fear to the media into knowing that animals are being consumed by people or the mistreating of animals. But the irony of PETAS organiation is that their protesting leads to many deaths of animals to prove a point, as long as animal meat is not consumed by humans. But when PETA gets involved with trying to compare hunters and poachers with the same purpose, thats when hunters like me must educate the …show more content…
Hunters obey the laws enacted to protect the animals including game and non game animals. Hunters respect the animal they are hunting. It is fair chase and the animal becomes food for the Hunter and his/her family. Like it or not, we by nature are predators. AS of nowhunters, are the most efficient way to keep animal population under control. Since we have intruded into the animals area, there is less room and natural food for large populations. Larger populations means disease and hunger. Poachers kill animals illegally. They do not obey the laws. They kill for profit because some PEOPLE like to buy the tusk, furs, etc of non game and protected animals. Don't put the blame on Hunters, but the buisness owners that finance the Poachers with their illegal