Preview

Essay On Indian Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Indian Act
Treaties and The Indian Act Partially Affirm Collective Rights.

Ever thought about the treaties and the Indian Act? Ever thought how it affirmed their collective rights? Well, they don’t really affirm collective rights, but then at the same time, they do. This essay is going to explain The Indian Act and the Treaties 6 and 7. It will review over all the facts and details to come to a conclusion if they do affirm collective rights. First, we’ll go over the Indian Act, the Treaty 6, and finish off with Treaty 7.

The Indian Act is a Canadian Federal law that governs in matters pertaining to Indian status, bands, and Indian reserves. The indian act is administered by Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, or otherwise known as the INAC. The Indian Act is a part of a long history of assimilation policies that intended to terminate the cultural, social, economic, and political distinctiveness of Aboriginal peoples by absorbing them into Canadian life and values. The indian act also enabled to government to the land base of the groups, and determine who qualifies as Indian in form of the Indian status. But, since the Indian Act was put into action at such an early period of time, it had gone through a series of changes to try and affirm their collective rights they earned.From this information, it comes to a
…show more content…
Rights, titles, privileges, and whatsoever was taken away as instructed to the terms of Treaty 6. But it was signed because of the disappearance of the buffalo in the areas, and of the disease that rolled through, killing many of the First Nations in the area of Treaty 6. One of the benefits to Treaty 6, is that the first nations got a medicine chest to stay for in urgent times. The government did better at affirming collective rights with treaty 6, but they’ll need to try

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ¨All men are created equal,¨ according to the Declaration of Independence. But, based on the government’s actions, this was not the case when it came to Indian Removal. When the government issued the Indian Removal act in 1830, there were two clear sides: one that supported it, and one that despised it. After the Supreme Court ruled against it, the wrongness of it became manifest. However, it still continued. The United States was not justified in enabling the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The arrival of the Canadian government in the early nineteen-hundreds was the last major encapsulating factor the Cree and the Ojibwa were to face after the Hudson Bay Company and the church. The methods adopted by the government were aimed at changing the social, economic, political and religious practices held within these societies. One of the first efforts undertaken by the Canadian government was to legalize any action it would take in the regions occupied by the Cree and the Ojibwa. Therefore, in 1905 and 1906 treaty 9 was signed with the people of Cree and the people of Ojibwa. With the introduction of treaty 9, logging, hydroelectric development, minerals, construction of road and railways started. This treaty also introduced new land policies, which allowed non-Indians to exploit the resources used before only by the…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Indian Act discriminate between Indigenous women and men due to ones arbitrariness and the regulations he or she follows. It is unfortunate that one of these reasons is due to their mixed-blood.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The report outlines the extensive issues that existed prior to the modern land claim negotiations processes, and some of the more recent efforts that the federal government has made in order to regain the trust of Aboriginal communities. This report is authorized by the Canadian government, who holds a wealth of specific details regarding land claim negotiations. In this respect, this source is about as reliable as it gets. The report fully outlines the specific and comprehensive land claim negotiations processes. This source will be instrumental to my understanding of the dialogue that occurs between the government and Aboriginal groups in land claim negotiations. As well, when working on my policy paper, I can refer to some of the legal literature referenced in this report, such as for example, The Indian Act. This can help me to obtain a firm grasp on the ways in which First Nations people have been marginalized in the past, and possible ways that the government can achieve reconciliation with…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other forces of assimilation that rose up near the introduction of the Indian Act was both the Gradual Civilization Act of 1857 and the Gradual Enfranchisement Act of 1869 (Henderson, “Indian Act”). Both these acts were responsible for stripping the status of First Nations people (Henderson, “Indian Act”). They “were almost uniformly aimed at removing any special distinction or rights afforded First Nations peoples and at assimilating them into the larger settler population (Henderson, “Indian Act”).” The only perk a First Nations person would gain in voluntarily abandoning their rights, is to gain the right to vote, which was later acquired in 1960 (Henderson, “Indian Act”). Describing the forces of assimilation allows the reader to understand…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Robert Bone, The term treaty generally included cash gratuities, and presents during the signing. Treaties between the two groups promised education, agricultural assistance, Rights to hunt and fish on crown land until such land was required for other purposes and land reserves to be held by the crown and entrusted to the Indian (Bone, 2011).Conflicts between the two signing parties of the treaties has arose during Canada in the 20th century as each group had different perceptions of the treaty agreements . This issue has caused a divide and has contributed tot the fault line between the two groups. The Crowns understanding of the treaties were that they would diminish aboriginal rights and their title to lands in hopes of having available land for agricultural advancements. As for the aboriginals, they understood it as an agreement to share the land and resources. With the two different perceptions of the treaties between the groups, conflict was bound to happen. An example of where conflict would occur was when government would sell crown land to corporations for extraction resources with out compensating the aboriginals. Many aboriginals lived on Crown land and the large corporations would destroy their natural way of life as they would interfere with hunting, trapping, fishing, and any many other resources needed to…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 1830, President Andrew Jackson (1829–1837) signed the Indian Removal Act, which would take tribes of eastern Indians, living in settled states, and resettle them in specially designated districts west of the Mississippi River in Indian Territory (now the state of Oklahoma). Many tribes were affected by the Indian Removal Act. Most notably, the Cherokees, Choctaws, Creeks, Chickasaws, and Seminoles tribes were subjected to eviction (O’Neill 11). By the large, these tribes were known as the "Five Civilized Tribes" (weiser). The tribes had their own customs, traditions, government, and territories. Until When the Indian Removal Act was implemented, however, they found themselves equally casted out. Though the terms of their departures diverse, the Five…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equality… for all or for some? In 1830, all of the Indians except for some of the Cherokee signed the Treaty of New Etocha. This treaty, was between a small group of Cherokee and the U.S. government where they agreed to leave. Most of the Cherokee refused to leave their land. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans and Indians have an abysmal, the americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imagine in today’s society, all of a certain minority being sent to Maine against their will while the public was cheering it on. It is incredibly immoral to do such a thing; yet in the early 1800’s this is basically what happened to the Cherokee Nation of Indians. Starting in 1814, Andrew Jackson wanted to move the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland of North Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama, to the present day state of Oklahoma. The Indian Nations traveled through the Trail of Tears to get to their forced new territory. They traveled in many different ways of transportation such as foot, horse, and wagon. Though many are informed of the horror of the Indian Removal Acts, the public seemed…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having people being treated poorly because of their skin color or their ethnicity today is not socially acceptable but back then, everyone did it. The Indian Removal act was an act created by President Jackson. He had these poor people forced from their property because of their ethnicity. The Indian Removal Act was not justified because the U.S. Government (President Jackson), lied to the Cherokee people about what they promised, President Jackson took away the Cherokee’s rights and the Cherokees had a lot of hardships while they walked the Trail of Tears. The Indian Removal Act was not fair for anyone and shouldn’t have been created in the first place. So many people lost their lives and their rights so it was not justified.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The treaty in 1866was the cause of the abolishment of the slavery in the Indian territories and the adoption of slaves. The Indian Reorganization Act of June 18, 1934 gave native Indians certain rights, which include the reversal of the Dawes Act’s privatization of the common holdings of the American Indians and a return to local self-government on a tribal basis. This act also gave the native Indians the right to manage their own land and this included provisions that were intended to create a sound economic foundation for the inhabitants of Indian…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Essay

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Like rain, the tears of anguish fell, sad moments locked in time …. Where each tear fell, as some will tell, will be seen a Cherokee rose,” (“A Cherokee Rose” by Rick Brown), tells that thousands of Cherokees were forced out of their homes and start heading west, during the trip to Oklahoma at least 4,000 Cherokee died. Many Cherokees died suffering through cruel and unfair government. In 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act, which was a law that forced Native Americans out of their land. In 1838 to 1839, 16,000 Cherokees were forced to walk 600 miles from Georgia to Oklahoma. The Cherokees did try to rebel against the United States government but it didn’t go as well as planned. President Jackson…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Canadian History

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Define Indian act : relationship with federal government ( placed under their guardianship) Reserves were created and more.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a heated topic in Congress. Defend the passage or rejection of the Act with reference to the moral, political, constitutional and practical concerns of a congressman.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays