Aboriginal Fault Line Analysis
Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Fault Line
Aljun Lagria
11117601
5 Pages
Sept 19, 2014
The term aboriginal is used to classify the first inhabitants to occupy the landmass of what is called Canada today. The different indigenous groups classified as aboriginal of Canada lived a harmonious life, relying on the land and what it had to offer to suffice their daily need. Thousands of year later, Europeans of English and French descent began exploration and managed to touch base on land that was first inhabited by the aboriginals. Upon their arrival, the Europeans were much more civilized and advanced when it came to tools and weaponry, which they traded for fur with …show more content…
These schools lasted from the 1880 up to the end of the 20th century with its primary objective of educating aboriginal children and take the Indian out of the child. This strategy was very damaging as children were separated from their families for extended periods and were prohibited from all cultural aspects of their aboriginal heritage. Children were severely punished for wrong doings and were subjected physical, psychological and sexual abuse. Residential schools damaged aboriginal culture and disrupted families all across Canada. The damaging effect has carried on for several generations and still exists in modern Canadian society. Since the young aboriginals were taken away at a young age, they did not have the nurturing from their families and lacked knowledge and skill on how to raise their own families. The environment of not knowing how to raise a family is very cyclical and continues to have devastating effects in today’s aboriginal communities. The implementation of residential schools was very devastating and was a form of cultural genocide (Hanson, 2011).The Canadian Government has tried resolving the issue by paying a 1.9 billion compensation package to the thousand of aboriginals affect by the Residential School system. Although the compensation budget and a formal apology by the prime minister is a kind gesture for Canada’s realization for the harm its …show more content…
According to Robert Bone, The term treaty generally included cash gratuities, and presents during the signing. Treaties between the two groups promised education, agricultural assistance, Rights to hunt and fish on crown land until such land was required for other purposes and land reserves to be held by the crown and entrusted to the Indian (Bone, 2011).Conflicts between the two signing parties of the treaties has arose during Canada in the 20th century as each group had different perceptions of the treaty agreements . This issue has caused a divide and has contributed tot the fault line between the two groups. The Crowns understanding of the treaties were that they would diminish aboriginal rights and their title to lands in hopes of having available land for agricultural advancements. As for the aboriginals, they understood it as an agreement to share the land and resources. With the two different perceptions of the treaties between the groups, conflict was bound to happen. An example of where conflict would occur was when government would sell crown land to corporations for extraction resources with out compensating the aboriginals. Many aboriginals lived on Crown land and the large corporations would destroy their natural way of life as they would interfere with hunting, trapping, fishing, and any many other resources needed to
Aljun Lagria
11117601
5 Pages
Sept 19, 2014
The term aboriginal is used to classify the first inhabitants to occupy the landmass of what is called Canada today. The different indigenous groups classified as aboriginal of Canada lived a harmonious life, relying on the land and what it had to offer to suffice their daily need. Thousands of year later, Europeans of English and French descent began exploration and managed to touch base on land that was first inhabited by the aboriginals. Upon their arrival, the Europeans were much more civilized and advanced when it came to tools and weaponry, which they traded for fur with …show more content…
These schools lasted from the 1880 up to the end of the 20th century with its primary objective of educating aboriginal children and take the Indian out of the child. This strategy was very damaging as children were separated from their families for extended periods and were prohibited from all cultural aspects of their aboriginal heritage. Children were severely punished for wrong doings and were subjected physical, psychological and sexual abuse. Residential schools damaged aboriginal culture and disrupted families all across Canada. The damaging effect has carried on for several generations and still exists in modern Canadian society. Since the young aboriginals were taken away at a young age, they did not have the nurturing from their families and lacked knowledge and skill on how to raise their own families. The environment of not knowing how to raise a family is very cyclical and continues to have devastating effects in today’s aboriginal communities. The implementation of residential schools was very devastating and was a form of cultural genocide (Hanson, 2011).The Canadian Government has tried resolving the issue by paying a 1.9 billion compensation package to the thousand of aboriginals affect by the Residential School system. Although the compensation budget and a formal apology by the prime minister is a kind gesture for Canada’s realization for the harm its …show more content…
According to Robert Bone, The term treaty generally included cash gratuities, and presents during the signing. Treaties between the two groups promised education, agricultural assistance, Rights to hunt and fish on crown land until such land was required for other purposes and land reserves to be held by the crown and entrusted to the Indian (Bone, 2011).Conflicts between the two signing parties of the treaties has arose during Canada in the 20th century as each group had different perceptions of the treaty agreements . This issue has caused a divide and has contributed tot the fault line between the two groups. The Crowns understanding of the treaties were that they would diminish aboriginal rights and their title to lands in hopes of having available land for agricultural advancements. As for the aboriginals, they understood it as an agreement to share the land and resources. With the two different perceptions of the treaties between the groups, conflict was bound to happen. An example of where conflict would occur was when government would sell crown land to corporations for extraction resources with out compensating the aboriginals. Many aboriginals lived on Crown land and the large corporations would destroy their natural way of life as they would interfere with hunting, trapping, fishing, and any many other resources needed to