Preview

English Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
616 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
English Speech
In a world where the biggest stories are ebola, roast busters and the naming of Kim Kardashians child (Northwest if you lived under a hole) there is the one thing that the mainstream media continues to overlook, the effect of animals on our society. No, not in the good way, this speech will look at the no good, lousy and downright evil animals that grace the face of the earth.

As I was looking through the news I happened to stumble upon a strange story in an alternative media branch, this story outlined the dirty deeds of one naught sheep. This sheep was found in a neighbouring farm with a trail of destruction in its wake and the sheep seemed to be ‘slightly overindulged’. In fact, this sheep had consumed approximately $4000 worth of Marijuana (that is about 1,000 of these). Now you might be thinking, hahahahaha Benji this story is crack-up but I believe that there is a deeper message to be pulled from this story. Lets imagine that this was not a sheep but a human being. Well, this person would be charged with possession and consumption of a prohibited substance, battery and maybe even trespassing on private property. We would all be thank full that this person is to be locked away for up to 10 years and happy he didn’t cause more damage. But the real question is….. Shouldn’t animals be charged and imprisoned for their baaaaaaaaaaaaad actions and wrong doing on the earth.

Now this whole issue revolves around the fact that non-human animals are sentient beings, that their lives and wellbeing are valuable. Given that they are sentient beings, they obviously have free will. They make decisions. It is obvious from simply observing them that they have personalities, preferences, values, friendships and loyalties. Take cats for example. Some are very friendly and Some are mean and will hiss and claw at everyone. Surely they realize they are not being very nice, to deny that would be to say that they are just dumb, thoughtless and mindless beasts. ….. But the point

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    We are using animals in such a horrific way that causes negative changes to the environment.We should always think what this world be if we didn’t have the things we have. We would be miserable and everything would be a competition. There’s lots of people out there working to try to make a difference in this world, but also need people to get involved. It fitted into our course goals and objective because it made me realize how much our world is so corrupt. The only thing we could do is change our ways of thinking, so we can actually live in a peaceful and stable society. Not to think, that we could lose everything in an…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The speech I chose was on September 9, 1997 from Queen Elizabeth II after Princess Diana’s death . The speech was more of an informal speech of her willingness to open herself up to the people of England during this great tragedy. The speech was effective in giving the queen a chance to show her compassion during the mourning of Princess Diana and this softened her image to the British people. The speech was something the public would not have been familiar with. The British thought Queen Elizabeth had an estranged relationship with the princess. I didn’t see any research in this speech. I do believe it was pressure that drove the queen to a public speech.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin 's article, “A Change of Heart About Animals” argues that animals are more like humans than we imagine and as a result should be treated with the care that they deserve. Rifkin develops and supports his argument using facts about the animals and these facts end up touching hearts. In order for Rifkin to get his point across he uses a smart technique by using pathos and plays with the emotions of his audience. Rifkin loves animals and his passion and love evokes emotions that the audience can feel. Animals can feel and have emotions similar to ours. in agreement with Rifkin, I argue that it is wrong and inhumane to kill or abuse animals because they feel, they deserve to have space and should be valued as much as humans are It is wrong no animal should be killed due to abuse or testing, it is wrong and inhumane.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justin Le Ms. Jackson ERWC English 28 October 2014 Animal Bill of Rights Despite our genetic makeup and ability, each living organism still obtains the ability to partake in the vast contribution towards this world. We as humans should be proactive in our role of establishing and maintaining a fine balance of life. A prominent responsibility we possess is to regard all living beings as equals.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    16 Phil 100 Singer

    • 1806 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Animals have no rational mind, and no soul; so we have no moral duty to…

    • 1806 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, one of the reasons that humans should be in a separate category from non-human animals is that human beings are conscious and can choose courses of action (Alger and Alger). Human beings are capable of taking wise decisions by using their judgement. On the other hand, the other animals are not conscious and operate only on instinct (Alger and Alger).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    speeches english

    • 266 Words
    • 1 Page

    An inherent tension between the actual and the possible is revealed through the development of ideas in a speech. Faith Bandler’s “Faith, Hope and Reconciliation” and Aung San Suu Kyi’s, “Keynote address at the 4th Beijing conference on women” both support this statement.…

    • 266 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should guiltless animals be treated as if they are a piece of meat? Should animals not be given rights because they are non-humans? Animal welfare is very important. Animals show that they are incapable of representing their own interest. It is our ethical duty towards them to show them that their welfare will be upheld. Many believe that animals are just pieces of meat and that they’ve been placed on this planet for our benefits. Animals have been around since the beginning of time. Animals contribute to our world in ways we can’t. Animals need to have rights just as humans. Animals deserve to be treated with love and respect.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not all animal lives are of equal worth. Human interests may outweigh those of nonhumans.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although animal moral considerability has peaked the interest of many contemporary philosophers, such as James Rachels and Peter Singer, the question is really an age-old question that can be traced back to Plato and Aristotle. Immanuel Kant has probed the question of whether an animal has moral considerability. Kant continuously makes the distinction between humans and animals throughout his best-known contributions to moral philosophy. Therefore, I will address and present the counter-argument to the charge of speciesism, one of critical arguments of the animal rights movement, through a Kantian lens.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taking a Stand Against Peta

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “We love all animals, it’s just people we’re not too crazy about,” is a comment made by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) (Fegan 1). This outrageous comment insinuates PETA puts animals’ rights before the rights and needs of humans, which is not the way nature intended. The PETA organization has been around since 1980 affectively with their hyped-up, illogical stories of how we need to treat animals as equals and grant them rights that only we, as humans, should enjoy. These are assumptions and claims which are used to further their cause and are not founded in reality. Contradictory to PETA’s beliefs, animals should not have the same rights as humans, because that is the law of nature. According to Erasmus Darwin, who stated “Such is the condition of organic nature! whose first law might be expressed in the words 'Eat or be eaten!”. (Science Quotes by Erasmus Darwin) I do not intend to condemn animal rights activists, since people are entitled to their own opinions, but rather discuss why this way of life may be harmful to themselves and others.…

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Cavalieri, Paola. (2001) the animal question, why nonhuman animals deserve human rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press…

    • 2250 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speech

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Doesn’t everyone just hate snoring? You have to agree with me that when you are awake at night and you are with some one that snores it is the most irritating thing in the world as half the time it is impossible to get back to sleep. Without a doubt if I succeed today snoring is most definitely going into room 101. The one and only major natural thing that really could make you sleep hell has to be stupendous, snotty snoring. When you awake the next day you are like a drowned rat as your body has not recovered at all from last night and therefore will completely ruin the day ahead. Why when we evolved were we given the power to snore? Half the time you want to get the person who is snoring and shake his body to bits just like a rattle. Or even cover his face in cold water to let the person feel what it is like not to be able to sleep. You know that snoring has just got to go in room 101 to save us from dreadful, irritating snoring!…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All animals have rights. Unfortunately, these rights are perceived to be to some degree because of the traditional belief that animals only have instrumental value. According to Tom Regan’s essay Case for Animal Rights, all animals have moral value. If an animal has the ability feel pain, they should have moral consideration. This is a utilitarian view, which focuses on the suffering and/or pleasure of beings as morally valuable. The subject of animal cruelty has existed for a multitude of years, and has only worsened through technological advances and meat industries, and the scientific world.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Animals should be treated with the same respect as humans”. Do you agree with this view? (220-260 words)…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays