Preview

English 112 Essay

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
English 112 Essay
Danielle Joseph
English 112/ 0002
Maginnes
February 26, 2013
Genetic Modified Humans: Is Not Acceptable In the essay, titled "Building Baby from the Genes Up?" Ronald M. Green proclaims his approval of genetic selection and extraction of human genes. He gives reasons that support his outlook on the matter, that this will be useful to civilization. Ronald M. Green is in violation of several ethical codes, with his view on genetic modification. I am against genetically modified humans, and I will explain to you, why this is my stance on the subject. First, I will summarize exactly what Ronald M. Green says in his article about his view on genetic modification and why practicing it is vital. Second, I will describe research involving human embryos and the disadvantages that genetic modification could possess for the future of human species by using research. Third, I will give you my viewpoint of why genetic modification is unethical and morally disturbing. In this essay, to support my standpoint, I will be using work from Rebecca Dresser, who wrote, "Genetic Modification of Preimplantation Embryos: Toward Adequate Human Research Policies." Rebecca Dresser describes current shortcomings and recommends policy actions are designed to ensure, that they must meet certain criteria for research on human modification being practiced. In addition, author, Sally Deneen's article entitled Designer People. Where she asks, Are We Changing the Nature of Nature? Richard Hayes, Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks, the opposing viewpoint to Ronald M. Green. In addition, to the Bible and other scholars, who also feel that, human genetic modification, is unethical. Ronald M. Green, started by using the example of tow British couples, they wanted to conceive a child, but over several generations, many of their female family members had died of breast cancer. The couple wanted to use in-vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to



Cited: Deneen, Sally. "Designer People." E Magazine. Jan./Feb. 2001: 26- 33. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 27 Feb 2013. Dresser, Rebecca. "Genetic Modification of Preimplantation Embryos: Towards Adequate Human Research Policies." The Millbank Quarterly. Vol. 82, No.1. 195-214. 2004. Print. Green, Ronald M. "Building Baby from the Genes Up". Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed. Bedford/ St. Martins. 9th ed. Boston. 515-518. Print. Hayes, Richard. "Genetically Modified Humans? No thanks". Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed. Bedford/ St. Martins. 9th ed. Boston.519-521. Print. The Holy Bible, King James Version. New York: American Bible Society: 1999. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, Richard Hayes in the article “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks”, published in the Washington Post address the topic of science’s developing world of selective genes and rebuttals the promotion of parent selective genes.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genetic Engineering Debate: Are There Lines We Shouldn’t Cross? written by Jessica Erickson, shows that just because we can genetic engineer, doesn’t mean we should leave it unsupervised. Currently genetic engineering is available for plants, animals, and humans. Genetic engineering for plants and animals is quicker and less complex then doing it on humans. The next subject Erickson wrights about is the uses of genetic engineering. Erickson believes that genetic engineering could be good if it benefits diseases, prevent, and treatments, on the other hand Erickson believes genetic engineering could be bad if it is used for “designer babies”. Erickson believes that there should be a “Do not cross line”, which means that there should be government…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Designer Babies Analysis

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When the topic of designer babies is presented, there is a multitude of ethical reasons that arise; one important concept is the questioning of how safe it is. The side effects of such a process are still unknown. Although the transfer of the DNA could be successful, there is a great possibility of a reshuffling of the entire genome. Assuming that the transfer and selectivity is completely safe, can it truly be considered…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opponents of the practice of genetic engineering in animals, like those that oppose crop genetic engineering, do so because of the risk associated with the practice and because they feel it would not do anything to help fight world hunger. However, the practice of genetic engineering in animals sparks a new group of opponents. These new group of opponents oppose the practice for ethical reasons. Brenda Almond, in “Commodifying Animals: Ethical Issues in Genetic Engineering of Animals,” states “it is, of course, true that the crossing of species and the creation of new forms of life seems to set humans a god-like challenge” (98). It appears that the author, like those who oppose the practice for ethical reasons, believes that there is only…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Designer Babies

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Designer Babies is a very controversial topic in regard to the moralities involved. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (designer baby) refers to the genetic structure being modified prior to the implantation or even prior the fertilization of the embryo. While a parent may have varying reasons for participating in the procedure, many people question the moral and ethical side of the situation. A common use for designer babies concerns possible uses of gene therapy techniques to create desired traits of a child, such as disease resistance, sex, hair colour and other cosmetic traits, athletic ability, or intelligence.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A powerful tool that lets scientists modify DNA coding with extreme nearly precision could be used to genetically engineer the human species. There's great potential that comes with these enhancements, such as curing genetic diseases, but more importantly being able to understand the genetic makeup of humans as a whole. This could be a great leap for mankind as a whole since landing in the moon. This is why I support the advancement of human enhancement through genetic alterations of the embryo. Along with me supporting this enhancement I believe stipulations should be placed on the use of these gene modification such as sex not being able to be chosen and age not being able to be lengthened.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gmo Sapiens

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the book GMO Sapiens the life changing science of designer s the author Paul Knoepfler takes us into the world of genetics. Mr. Knoepfler discusses the pros and cons related to this technology. The term GMO Sapiens is a mashup of Homo Sapiens and GMO (Genetically modified organism) put together by Mr. Knoepfler. Although there are other methods to genetic modifications the CRISPR-Cas9 approach seems to be the simplest and most affordable, as a result the author focuses on this method (Knoepfler 140). Some of the ethical issues faced by this new technology are as follows.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Green does not think genetic modification is all that threatening to life as he concludes “Although, I acknowledge the risks, I believe that we can and will incorporate gene technology into the ongoing human adventure.”(Green, 572). Richard Hayes was the founding executive director of the Berkeley, California-based Center for Genetics and Society. Author of “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks.” Richard Hayes objects the thought of human gene modification in his article. He talks about how modifying genes that cause obesity just to prevent the stress of being obese later should not be the way genetic modification is used. Using genetic modification to take away obesity traits raise ethical issues. He thinks it is unethical to create humans to a desired genetic coding for their future benefits. Hayes says that the issue can cause global problems for living conditions and current world affairs. “What happens when some rogue country announces an ambitious program to improve the genetic stock” of its citizens? In a world still barely able to contain the forces of nationalism, ethnocentrism, and militarism, the last thing we need to…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In a world with imperfect and defective humans, society strives to become as perfect as the advances in the scientific world allow them to. Since the discovery of genetic engineering any organism can be modified as pleased with the desired traits chosen. Science has given man enough power to configure every human’s DNA, the genetic material that determines the makeup of all living cells (The American Heritage Science Dictionary, 2002). The miracle breakthrough of genetic engineering has opened up the possibilities for curing genetic deformations, producing better pharmaceuticals, reproductive technology, and countless other medical fields. However, with the potential for genetically engineered humans come great risks and responsibilities. Whether or not genetic engineering should be used to modify human beings remains questionable by our spiritual, moral, ethical, and legal perspectives. Now that this technology is in our hands, we should use it solely for the well-being of our people and not to fool with the intended course of nature.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics of Nanotechnology

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    4. Kilner, John F., Rebecca D. Pentz, Frank E. Young, eds. Genetic Ethics. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm B. Eerdman Publishing Company. 1997.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Human Genetic Engineering

    • 2974 Words
    • 12 Pages

    With human genetic engineering, as with other things in life, there are two sides to every argument and story. To some people, this is a chance for a better and healthier life. To others it is being seen as a way to “play God” and a way to try and “program” a human being. Both views create valid arguments to discuss and valid sides to take. Genetic engineering could be used to enhance people’s lives from a positive view, but it could also turn into something detrimental to society and can create something that leads to the extinction of human life as we know it.…

    • 2974 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Posthuman Analysis

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The accumulating information about biotechnology and its implications are now becoming more of a common idea in society. Every day more and more experts spread the information about the technologies of our future and how they can be used in our every day lives. In such readings as we have discussed, the authors use these scientific ideas to try and explain how our future may unfold in the realm of genetic engineering. On the basis of biotechnology, there is a gray area regarding whether genetic engineering is a positive or negative science. Such scientists surrounding this debate are either interested in seeing a future with genetic engineering, or are in opposition to the science’s powerful problems. Whether it’s accepting the technology for what it is, or making a stand against what is to come, everyone takes a position on the issue. I believe, with all of the information forming from the articles: Biotechnology and the fear of Frankenstein by Courtney Campbell, Race, Gender, and Genetic Technologies: A New Reproductive Dystopia by Dorothy E. Roberts, and Our Porsthuman Future by Francis Fukuyama, that the technological advances pushing us into a posthuman future are too dangerous and revolutionary, consequently, they need to be controlled in order to secure a better fate for humanity.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays