Preview

Summary Of Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks By Richard Hayes

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
238 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks By Richard Hayes
Summary
Executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, Richard Hayes in the article “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks”, published in the Washington Post address the topic of science’s developing world of selective genes and rebuttals the promotion of parent selective genes.
Hayes support his claim by evaluating his opponent’s flawed argument and using a modest tone to establish his.
The author’s overall purpose is to remind his audience of reality. He states this practice would bring unnecessary results.
Evaluate How
Hayes is cautious about his ethos and he demonstrates it from the beginning of the article. The genes topic has captured a large following, thus debunking it could potentially anger readers. There is no strategy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Most people would concede that cloning and genetic enhancements are two notorious words that most would not consent with. In Mr. Kass’s article “Preventing Brave New World” commences on the astonishing achievements in bio-medical science and technology. Mr. Leon E. Kass agrees that people should be obliged for the breakthrough of advanced bio medical science and technology. Mr. Kass’s incredible work in bio-ethical science has placed this very well known philosopher in the white house with the Bush’s administration. Mr. Kass mentions in his article that we live in a world where transforming powers are already being applied in the 20th century, For example; In vitro fertilization, bottled embryos wombs, surrogate wombs, cloning, genetic screening,…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Darcy talks about how an advisory committee is producing genetically modified human beings. Meaning these would change cells in the the bodies of the born babies. Darcy also mentioned that 1,000 to 4,000 children in the United States are born with a mitochondrial disease each year, and the symptoms go from okay to horrific. Although many scholars, scientist and policy makers have had some concerns. They thought that we should be careful in the thought of doing this because what if it affects the lives of the generations ahead of our time. They also said to be thoughtful in the genetic experiment by which “we should…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essay “Building Baby from the Genes Up” by Ronald M. Green explains how in the future, parents might be able to design the genes of their future baby. Green supports genetic engineering of embryos, “why not improve our genome?” (549). He thinks that with the process of in vitro and preimplantation, it could eliminate disease or confer desirable features onto our future. Some medical professionals is concerned about the effect of genetic selection in parenting, Green said “The critics concerns may be less troublesome than they appear”, he thinks that parents will not love their children any less in the quest of perfection, and any kids will not be pressured to live up to perfectionist and expectation.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Baltimore’s written work of Limiting Science: A Biologist’s Perspective discusses the controversy of research in molecular biology and its limitless freedom, disputing there should be freedom in which direction science heads, but the public should decide the pace at which it goes. Baltimore first begins his argument with the discussion of how molecular biology began. It was born from individual sciences where attempts at trying to solve the mysteries in these fields led to the realization that the answers lied in genetics. Advances in the field are what really are at the heart of this discussion though. The most critical one is the development of recombinant DNA where DNA can be multiplied for an indefinite period, but the potential of this process has scared some scientists, even Baltimore himself, about unforeseen events. This led to even more unsettling questions that inevitably hurt the field of genetics, which Baltimore goes on to explain that the dangers have been blown out of proportion. The most common subject that comes to discussion through these fears is genetic engineering. Baltimore delves into the two techniques for altering imperfect genes, and then raises two questions that normally pop up. Who gets to decide what genes get altered and how will they decide it will be done? For Baltimore this presents a dilemma of both ethics and morals and thus presents the real problem at heart. To clarify the argument against recombinant DNA research Baltimore presents to the reader similar arguments. After he gives us the danger of actively researching genetic engineering, Baltimore flips the coin and argues the danger of restricting it. His theory is that the criterion used to decide how science should be handled reflects a dominant principle of governing. This should not be allowed to control scientific advances nor should science be the servant to this ideology, mainly because of the repercussions on society it could…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hayes is the executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, which is a nonprofit information and public affairs organization working to encourage responsible uses and effective societal governance of human genetic and reproductive technologies and other emerging technologies. He holds a PhD from Energy and Resources from the University of California at Berkeley. He served as assistant political director and then as national director of volunteer development.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Designer Babies Analysis

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    People strive for progression in order to move forward with the changing times. As scientific technology progresses, people begin to move towards the bright idea of perfection. This could be seen in the concept of designer babies. A designer baby is a baby that has its genes specifically chosen in order to ensure that a certain gene is or is not present. This concept brings about many questions regarding the safety and the ethics of choosing specific traits for a child. The articles “The art of medicine: Designer babies: Choosing our children's genes,” by Bonnie Steinbock and “Children to…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hooked On A Myth

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Braithwaite’s article does not only do use of research, but at the same time includes nothing that actually proves her claims right. At one point of Braithwaite’s article,…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic modification is becoming closer and closer to an everyday possibility. With this possibility comes a whirlwind of possible effects, both positive and negative. There has been a history of opposition towards these technologies, oftentimes because of fear that the capabilities would be abused. However, the potential that newborns could be born free of hereditary diseases outweighs the fear of “designer babies”.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Robbins, Nicholas. "Genetic Engineering: True Freedom of Choice." mhcc.edu. mhcc. Web. 9 Feb 2013. http://www.mhcc.edu/docs/exit17/essays/ed12/Nicholas_Robbins.pdf.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How much of genetic information can the parents or relatives access raises a concern that it might result in an excessive use of reprogenetics. Furthermore, if scientists allow DNA screening for parents to avoid passing genetic diseases to their children, that might lead to more designer babies. Human genetic engineering is new and current field that has its pros and cons. Therefore, we should be more concerned about setting up the limits of how much access the public and scientists can have on genetic information, and taking in consideration the ethical issues behind…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skills

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Page 59.Imaging that scientists were able to identify specific genes linked to serious criminal behavior, and it was possible to remove or redesign these genes. Would you be in favor of this type of gene manipulation? Why or Why not…

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science has now reached a point where upcoming parents can choose what type of genes their children can be born with and not realizing that it can go terribly wrong.While trying to modify our babies the ending result can create a new illness that might not have a cure for it. According to Sheldon Krimsky “with respect to the farmer, there are safer and more dependable methods for preventing the birth of a child with a severe genetic abnormality than by genetic modification of the germ cell”. Modifying our babies can create an illness that will inquire a cure that won’t be existing but these babies will also create a gap in our society.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A powerful tool that lets scientists modify DNA coding with extreme nearly precision could be used to genetically engineer the human species. There's great potential that comes with these enhancements, such as curing genetic diseases, but more importantly being able to understand the genetic makeup of humans as a whole. This could be a great leap for mankind as a whole since landing in the moon. This is why I support the advancement of human enhancement through genetic alterations of the embryo. Along with me supporting this enhancement I believe stipulations should be placed on the use of these gene modification such as sex not being able to be chosen and age not being able to be lengthened.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eugenics

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Today’s society is filled with contrasting ideologies and mindsets, some more controversial than others. The field of medical ethics consists of many debatable issues that remain irresolute and continue to provoke opposing deliberation. Among these subjects is the practice of eugenics. Eugenics is essentially a science with the stated aim of “improving the genetic constitution of the human species through selective breeding.” (Kevles 253) Although its methods propose ways to target and eliminate specific undesired or burdening traits from the human gene pool, eugenics should be discouraged because it defies society’s established moral standards, arouses social issues, and challenges genetic diversity.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays