Dummy
Researching Organizational Culture Using the Grounded Theory Method
Noel Pearse and MacDonald Kanyangale Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
N.Pearse@ru.ac.za mkanyangale@yahoo.com
Abstract: Researching organizational culture using the grounded theory method is intuitively logical, given the ease of conceptualising organizational culture as a basic social process. In spite of its intuitive appeal, there are numerous challenges along the research voyage that could facilitate or jeopardise the unsuspecting researcher’s investigation. The aim of this paper is to alert prospective researchers, to some of the critical considerations that arise when designing and conducting research of this nature. The paper first tackles issues that are related to the conceptualisation of organizational culture as the phenomenon of interest, before turning to the research design implications. Research considerations that are related to the conceptualisation of organizational culture and the formulation of the research, include (1) the school of thought that the researcher embraces and the implications of its research traditions; (2) the assumptions made about the nature of organizational culture (such as its degree of uniformity or variation, its definition and construction, and its stability and development over time) and the implications for its investigation; (3) the contextual characteristics of the study (such as the size of the organization being investigated) and their implications for the manifestation of organizational culture; and (4) the researcher’s values and interests and their implications for accessing credible data. Other than the implications of conceptualisation of organizational culture on the formulation of the research problem, further research design considerations discussed include (1) aligning the researcher’s ontological and epistemological assumptions with the assumptions made about organizational culture; (2) identifying sources of data and
Noel Pearse and MacDonald Kanyangale Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
N.Pearse@ru.ac.za mkanyangale@yahoo.com
Abstract: Researching organizational culture using the grounded theory method is intuitively logical, given the ease of conceptualising organizational culture as a basic social process. In spite of its intuitive appeal, there are numerous challenges along the research voyage that could facilitate or jeopardise the unsuspecting researcher’s investigation. The aim of this paper is to alert prospective researchers, to some of the critical considerations that arise when designing and conducting research of this nature. The paper first tackles issues that are related to the conceptualisation of organizational culture as the phenomenon of interest, before turning to the research design implications. Research considerations that are related to the conceptualisation of organizational culture and the formulation of the research, include (1) the school of thought that the researcher embraces and the implications of its research traditions; (2) the assumptions made about the nature of organizational culture (such as its degree of uniformity or variation, its definition and construction, and its stability and development over time) and the implications for its investigation; (3) the contextual characteristics of the study (such as the size of the organization being investigated) and their implications for the manifestation of organizational culture; and (4) the researcher’s values and interests and their implications for accessing credible data. Other than the implications of conceptualisation of organizational culture on the formulation of the research problem, further research design considerations discussed include (1) aligning the researcher’s ontological and epistemological assumptions with the assumptions made about organizational culture; (2) identifying sources of data and
References: Allard, F. and Anderson, E. (2005) “Ethnography”, In Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, Elsevier Inc, Vol.1, pp. 833-843. Annells, M. (1996) “Grounded Theory Method: Philosophical Perspectives, Paradigm of Inquiry, and Postmodernism”. Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 379-393. Backman, K. and Kyngas, H. A. (1999) “Challenges of the Grounded Theory Approach to a Novice Researcher”, Nursing & Health Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp.147-153. Baker, M.J. (2002) “Research Methods”, The Marketing Review, Vol.3, No. 2, pp. 167-193. Berg, B.L. (2007) Qualitative Research Methods for Social Sciences, 6th edition, New York, Pearsons Education Inc. nd Creswell, J.W. (2007) Qualitative inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions, 2 Edition , London, Sage Publication. Cutcliffee, J.R. (2000) “Methodological Issues in Grounded Theory”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol.31, No. 6, pp. 1476-1484. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine Atherton. Glaser, B.G. (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergency vs Forcing, Mill Valley, The Sociological Press. Goulding, C. (1998) Grounded Theory: The Missing Methodology on the Interpretivist agenda. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 50-57. Goulding, C. (1999) Grounded Theory: Some Reflections on Paradigm, Procedures and Misconceptions, Wolverhampton: Wolverhampton Business School, University of Wolverhampton. Haugh, H. and McKee, L. (2004) “The Cultural Paradigm of the Smaller Firm”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 42, No.4, pp. 377-394. Henwood, K.L and Pidgeon, N.F. (1992) “Qualitative Research and Psychological Theorizing”, British Journal of Psychology, Vol.83, pp. 97-111. Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G., Nuijen, B., Ohayvc, D. and Sanders G. (1990) “Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 286-316. Izzo, A. (2003) Verstehen and the unconscious: A Historical Overview, In R. Boudon, M. Cherkaoui and P. Demeulenaere (Eds.), The European Tradition in Qualitative Research, Vol. 3, London: Sage Publications. Jaskyte, K and Dressler, W. (2004) “Studying Culture as an Integral Aggregate Variable: Organisational Culture and Innovation in a Group of Non-profit Organisations”, Field Methods Vol.14, No.3, August, pp.265-284. Johnson. (2000) “Strategy through a Cultural Lens: Learning from Managers` Experience”, Management Learning, Vol.31, No.4, pp.403-426. Kendall, J. (1999) “Axial Coding and the Grounded Theory Controversy”, Western Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 743-757. Kotter, J.P. and Heskett, J.L. (1992) Corporate Culture and Performance, New York, Free Press. Martin. J. (1992) Cultures in Organisational Culture: Three Perspectives, Oxford University Press. Martin, J. and Frost, P. (2004) The Organisation Culture Games: A Struggle for Intellectual Dominance. In Clegg, S., Hardy, C. Nord, W. and Lawrence, T. (eds).Handbook of Organisational Studies, London, Sage. Maznevski, M.L. Gomez, C. Distefano, J.J. Noorderhaven, N.G and Chuaan W.P. (2002) “Cultural Dimensions at the Individual Level of Analysis: The Cultural Orientations Framework”, International Journal of Cross Cultural Mnagement, Vol.2, No.3, pp.275-295. Miller, P. (1979) “Temporal Concepts: A schematic Analysis”, Process Studies, Vol.9, No1-2, spring, pp.22-29. Parker, L. D. and Roffey, B. H. (1997) “Back to the Drawing Board: Revisiting Grounded Theory and the Everyday Accountant’s and Manager’s Reality”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 212-247. Partington,D. (2000) “Building Grounded Theory of Management Action”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 11, pp.91-102. Pettigrew, A.M. (1990) “Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice”, Organization Science, Vol.1, No.3, pp.267-292. Pettigrew, A.M. (1997) “What is Processual Analysis?” Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol.13, No.4, pp. 337-348. Sackman, S.A. (1991) Cultural Knowledge on Organisations: Exploring the Collective Mind. California, Sage Publications, Inc. Schein, E. (1984) “Coming to a New Awareness of Organisational Culture”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 3-16. Schein, E. (1990) “Organization Culture”, American Psychologist, Vol. 45, No.2, pp.109-119. Schein, E. (1996a) “Three Cultures of Management: The Key to Organisational Learning”, Sloan Management Review. Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 9-20. www.ejbrm.com 73 ISSN 1477-7029 Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods Volume 7 Issue 1 2009 (67 - 74) Schein, E. (1996b) “Culture: The Missing Concept in Organisation Studies”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.41, pp. 229-240. Scott, T., Mannion, R., Davies, H. and Marshall, M. (2003) “The Quantitative Measurement of Organizational Culture in Health Care: A Review of the Available Instruments”, Health Services Research, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 923-945. Schwandt, T.A. (1994) “Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Enquiry”, In Denzin,N.Y and Lincoln.Y.S. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Trompenaars, F. and Hampden-Turner, C. (1998) Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, New York, and McGraw-Hill. www.ejbrm.com 74 ©Academic Conferences Ltd