Preview

Domestic Surveillance Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
957 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Domestic Surveillance Pros And Cons
On September 11, 2001, a group of terrorists hijacked two commercial planes, flying them straight toward the Twin Towers destroying one of the most well-known landmarks. This act was responsible for the death of thousands of innocent citizens.The Domestic Surveillance Program was created as a result of the treacherous September 11 attacks under the hope that they could prevent the possibility of more fatalities. Conducted by the National Security Agency, this program sparked a great debate on whether the collection of citizens’ personal lives to protect their safety was ethical or not. This issue is important to the state of our country as no one is entirely sure whether sacrificing some of our privacy actually helps in keeping us safe. Domestic …show more content…
National Reviews states, “The program does not represent a violation of the Constitution because the Fourth Amendment does not protect dialed phone numbers, in contrast to the content of the communications, because individuals lose privacy over those numbers when they are given to the phone number.” This quotes proves that the public, when purchasing electronics, understands that they would have to sacrifice some of their privacy when providing phone companies their numbers, and these sacrifices are used to aid them, keeping them safe and protected. The Fourth Amendment is not being violated as their phone numbers are not personal as they are left for the public to see. My opposition believes that Domestic Surveillance is a clear violation against the Fourth Amendment right of no unreasonable searches or seizure; however, according to National Review, “Our Constitution’s authors and proponents warned against bowing to the sort of demagoguery that lies behind attacks on the NSA program as unconstitutional invasion of our rights. The Federalists Papers - the Bible of the Constitution’s meaning - warn at the outset.” This quote explains that Federal Surveillance is not represented as an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. In fact, it was those who wrote the Constitution who warned citizens to not be tricked into the irrational claims made up by some. …show more content…
According to Cornell University, “ The researchers found that video surveillance systems were most effective in parking lots. Across the studies included in the analysis, CCTV resulted in a 51 percent decrease in crimes committed in parking lots. CCTV resulted in a 23 percent decrease in crime on public transportation.” This quote shows that security cameras cause criminals to think about their actions consequences before committing a crime. Which would never occur without the aid of the closed circuit television cameras, also known as CCTV. While a concern for privacy is a great factor when it comes to surveillance, majority of the citizens feel as the well being of those around them are far more important. Some falsely believe that CCTV cameras only infringe on society's privacy and has no effect when it comes to preventing possible crimes from occurring; yet, according to Urban Institutes, “ Our evaluation of three cities found that the most effective systems are monitored by trained staff, have enough cameras to detect crimes in progress, and integrate the technology into all manner of law enforcement activities.” This quote describes that it has been proven that using the CCTV cameras help discern criminals from the rest of the citizens. When they are monitored by trained staff, the use of the technology can allow police to find out exactly when

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On May 7, 2015 the Federal Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the National Security Agency's collection of American phone records in bulk is illegal. Specifically, they ruled that the practice did not fall under the scope of the USA Patriot Act, which allows wire tapping of individuals to detect and prevent terrorism. What is the USA Patriot Act? The USA Patriot Act is a 10-letter acronym for uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act of 2001. It was passed by Congress following the terrorist attacks of September 11 and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001. Later when it was set to expire in 2011 Barack Obama renewed the law for another 4 years. The Patriot Act…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On September 11, 2001, about 3,000 people were killed, and over 6,000 people were injured in the United States. Al-Qaeda, a group of Islamic extremists, hijacked four airplanes to execute suicide attacks. Two of the compromised airliners hit the World Trade Center towers in New York City. Another plane struck the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and the last plane crashed in Pennsylvania in a field. The American people were unfortunately surprised because of those attacks; many loved ones were lost, and many terrorists escaped from our government’s reach. Because of this infamous event, the officials of the United States government have debated and are currently debating whether they, the government, should be allowed to observe and retain information…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of police body cameras is very controversial. When the looking at the big picture, the cameras are beneficial because of the general positive influence it has on both sides of the police- civilian interaction. There might be slight concerns about the privacy of the public but there is substantial proof that the police body cameras have an overall positive affect on…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2010, it became legal for the National Security Agency (NSA) to access private email logs, social media accounts and other internet databases (Risen & Poitras, "N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens). Risen and Poitras (2013) explain that the intention of this change was to help protect the United States (U.S.) from future terrorist attacks and was for the general purpose of national safety. It is unclear how many terrorist attacks all of this new intelligence has actually prevented, however, it is very clear that the NSA’s actions are violating the privacy of not only American citizens, but everyone who lives on American soil. With the internet as a resource, this means that they can not only listen in to conversations, but access virtually any data that is entered via the internet. This includes credit card numbers, GPS coordinates, flight destinations, contact information for family members, personal pictures and much more. The NSA not only violates the constitutional rights of American citizens, it puts everyone in the country at great personal risk for crimes such as fraud and discrimination.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police dashboard have been in use by some law enforcement agencies since the mid19990s. Following the shooting death of an armed black teenager in Missouri, in august 2014, and an officer involved in that shooting protests erupted across the country and community leader called for all police officers to be equipped with body cameras, Th0se officers that wear body camera and it claim that their use will reduce the use of force by police officers and lesson the number of complaints by citizens against the police. Opponent of having citizens wear body camera cite privacy concerns especially if the video recording are made part of the public record. Body camera are on the verge of changing as we know it. A particular thorny questions is wheter officers who use force against individuals should…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NSA infiltrating the United States citizen's technology such as cell phones and computers is unjustified because there are no filters for the NSA or knowledge of their investigation taking place. For example "In his interview with RT, Binney emphasized that the FBI does not filter email messages but obtains and stores all of a person's e-mails, and when he or she becomes a target, their entire records are extracted and analyzed for the desired information" (NSA Whistleblower). Coming up with filtering processes would allow them to save time and filter out the non-terrorist threats. Many people make mistakes under pressure, knowing the National Security Agency is hunting you down is tons of pressure ask Osama bin…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Scans

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One September 11, 2001 Islamic Terrorists hijacked several flights and struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The US was shaken by 9/11. In response to the attacks the US passed laws to protect its people. The Patriot Act was one of the laws or acts that was passed in response to the 9/11 attacks. The goals of the Patriot Act were to strengthen domestic security and increase the powers of law-enforcement agencies to stop terrorism. In addition, the US Department of Homeland security created the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) to protect the nation’s Airways. Finally we have organizations such as the NSA that collect domestic and foreign information in order to protect the US. However, we end up sacrificing our privacy without…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In light of recent events, tensions amongst American communities and police officers have heightened due to the shootings of unarmed civilians and the alleged use of excessive force. These events have brought the integrity of police officers into question raising the question onto whether or not police officers should wear body cameras. This would serve to improve public relations with the local communities and provide a new source of indisputable hard evidence. Unfortunately, everything also comes with its disadvantages and while the benefits of body cameras do outweigh the negatives on paper, they may still not be enough to result in wide scale implementation. Such disadvantages include cost, as the cost of a single body camera ranges from $400 to $700 (Taser International Inc.) The reliability of these cameras may also be called into question as technological bugs are inevitable. According to research conducted by PERF and the COPS office, officers should be required to activate their cameras when responding to calls meaning that they are turned off while on duty. This may allow a police officer to tamper with evidence or to manipulate the cameras as they are in total control. Body cameras may be a potential solution for a growing problem, and while there seem to be an abundance of benefits, many drawbacks do also question the viability of such a project.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sub-Point A, Legality : The Heritage Foundation(1.1) has documented the legal and constitutional precedence for the NSA's data collection programs. In 1976 the Supreme Court ruled that when information is provided to a third party, such as a phone provider, it is accepted that said information may be turned over to the government. Furthermore, in the 1979 case of Smith v. Maryland, it was affirmed that a warrant was not needed to survey phone data. This stands under the fourth amendment, as actual content, or rather the phone conversation itself, is not obtainable, merely phone numbers and call length times are logged by the National Security Agency.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police brutality is a huge problem in America today, and few steps are being taken to prevent this injustice. One way of eliminating some of this from society is having police officers wear manually activated cameras on their bodies to record any interactions with civilians. Recently, multiple cases revolving around police brutality including two extremely controversial cases from 2014 where two black men (Eric Garner and Michael Brown) were killed by white officers who later were not charged. The news and multiple social media websites took notice of these cases and it became a widespread public issue. A way to solve this problem is to have law enforcement wear these cameras so that the video recordings can be used to resolve many disputes revolving around necessary force. Body cameras…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, police departments across the country have received much scrutiny for recent actions. The latest installment to the never-ending saga, that we all follow on the evening news, is the highly controversial topic of police body cameras. These cameras would attempt to provide an officers perspective to difficult situations and might help explain the actions of our police officers. Two recent articles published by the L.A. Times and The New York Times outline the pros and cons to making body cameras standard issue. The article published by the L.A. Times written by Matt Pearce takes a negative stance on the topic. The article clearly outlines the cons to body cameras and provides little insight to their benefits. The article published by…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    effects of Patriot Act

    • 1268 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On September 11, 2001, terrorists attacked New York City’s World Trade Center towers. This was the first time since the Revolutionary War that America was attacked on its own soil. The attacks were unprecedented, and the government never saw it coming. For millions of Americans an unwanted new world order was coming in the days ahead, where even the most secure places in the country would be placed under tighter security and be in a lockdown type of situation. Because of the 9/11 attacks, Congress passed the Patriot Act in 2001. Citizen privacy was abridged. The government had increased its ability to intrude on peoples’ private lives. Security policies of the United States were, supposedly, strengthened by being able to wiretap and use various other surveillance techniques without warning or acknowledgement, thereby infringing on individuals’ daily lives and lessening their personal freedom. President George W. Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act by all means is one of the most debated acts in United States history. That bill was intended to radically increase government powers of investigation and prosecution. From 2001 until now, the debate about the loss of personal liberty and constitutionality continues.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Usa Patriot Act

    • 3513 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The catastrophic events that took place on September 11, 2001 opened America’s eyes to the realization that we are not as safe as we believed. Hi-jackers took control of four commercial jets with sole intentions of causing destruction on American soil. Three of the planes reached their targets completely destroying the World Trade Center and severely damaging the Pentagon. In the wake of this realization, legislation was passed that gave far reaching powers to the government to protect the United States and its citizens. This legislation is The USA Patriot Act of 2001. President Bush signed the act into law on October 26, 2001. The goal of this paper is to explore the changes that were made due to the passage of The USA Patriot Act, the controversy in the speediness of its passage and what it means for our civil liberties and our rights under the constitution. What price are we paying to feel safer in this country?…

    • 3513 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    America has become a surveillance society, and we need to find a better balance to protect American civil right. Recent revelations about the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs have triggered diverse responses from the American public. The American Civil Liberties Union has expressed virulent opposition to the government’s alleged privacy intrusions as well as filed a lawsuit over the NSA’s collection of citizens’ telecommunications data. The National Security Agency's mass tracking and collection of Americans' phone call data violates the constitution, has a chilling effect on fourth amendment rights and should be stopped. It has been public information for a decade that the US government secretly, illegally, and unconstitutionally spies on its citizens.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you have got nothing to hide, why are you scared? This is one of the main arguments supporting government surveillance. But if you went out and found someone snooping through your bin, would you say, “Oh, it’s okay, I have got nothing to hide”? Of course not! Would you be comfortable telling all the people in the near vicinity all the information that the government is going to see with the surveillance programme, even if you have got nothing to hide? Of course not!…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays