Preview

Dimopoulos Dimosthenis Realism and Complex Interdependence Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dimopoulos Dimosthenis Realism and Complex Interdependence Summary
In Keohane and Nye, “Realism and Complex Interdependence”, Chapter 1-3, two major questions are attempted to be answered: what are the major features of world politics when interdependence, particularly economic interdependence, is extensive; and how and why do international regimes change.
In these chapters, Nye and Keohane, as they attempt to explain power and interdependence, articulates two main forms of interdependence: sensitivity and vulnerability. They opt to contrast their theory of world politics, which is called Complex Interdependence with Realism.
Realism has three main characteristics: a) states are the key actors in world politics; b) force is a useable and competent tool for states and c) world politics issues are organized hierarchal with military security as their pinnacle. On the other hand, Complex Interdependence is based on the following: a) the key actors in world politics are states; transnational actors and organizations, which communicate via informal and formal channels, b) there is no clear hierarchy in world politic issues and c) force is not used when complex interdependence prevails on a set of issues.
Keohane’s and Nye’s theory gives rise to political processes which translate power into outcomes, such as: a) Because there is no clear hierarchy of issues, state goals will vary by issue, as will the distribution of power and the political process associated with the issue; b) the politics of agenda formation and control will become more important because there is no clear hierarchy (domestic and other groups may be able to politicize issues that would not otherwise make the international agenda); c) the line between domestic and international politics becomes blurred because there are multiple channels of interaction and d) the increasingly significant role for international organizations. Subsequently, they provide four possible models under which international regimes change and they seek to combine them in their efforts to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    WK 5 Assignment

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The International Relations theory that best fits the Gini-out-of-the-bottle approach for this report is the theory of realism. There are five different classes of realism but the two that stands out to me are classic and neorealism. Classic realism leans towards those that represent a pessimistic view and the fact that people are not often what they appear to be and they it would behoove a government not to be so trusting of others. Neorealism represents the struggle of someone that is greedy for more such as power.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Then he moved on to Hindess’ analysis of power as a simple given quantity. He believed that power can only be achieved by the ruler of a political community if he/she is duly recognized by the citizens as their leader. This has been the central idea of modern international relations thinking. But it is still a part of the capacity-outcome view of power which Hindess is trying to ignore due to its simplicity. He enumerated the reasons why a capacity-outcome view weaken its right as an explanatory device based on Hindess. First is that power is an interaction and one in which the reciprocal action of the parties’ means that each actor’s moves conditions the action of the other, and the different means to exercise ‘power’ are seldom compatible.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Realism, as a way of interpreting international relations has often been conceived to be closely tied to the Cold War. Realism, rooted in the experience of World War II and the Cold War, is said to be undergoing a crisis of confidence largely because the lessons adduced do not convincingly apply directly to the new realities of international relations in the twenty-first century (Clinton 2007:1) Worse still, if policymakers steadfastly adhere to realist precepts, they will have to navigate “the unchartered seas of the post-Cold War disorder with a Cold War cartography, and blind devotion to realism could compromise their ability to prescribe paths to a more orderly and just system.” (Kegley 1993:141). This paper will demonstrate that this picture of realism is incomplete – realism is not an obsolete theory in contemporary international relations, but is indeed relevant - it can be, and has been applied in the twenty-first century. In order to prove this, the work of well-known political thinkers thought to be the precursors of realism, and the writings of present-day international relations analysts will be examined, and the core tenets of realism will be extracted. It will be argued that these root concepts of realist thought do not rely on the circumstances of the Cold War, and are thus not bound by its confines, with the possibility that these lessons retain their validity in addressing issues in the post-Cold War world of international relations.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Donnelly, Jack, Realism and International Relations, (2004), The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press , pp. 6-43…

    • 4317 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Neorealsim field today there is a debate on whether the current international system is unipolar or multipolar. People who view it as multipolar see other great powers arising and International Government Organizations have an influence on international politics. Although this is true, the United States of America and NATO still have a greater influence above all other actors in today’s international system, making it a unipolar system. A system that is unipolar can be defined as a center of power in which all others revolve. NATO’s military force, economic influence, and foreign intervention exemplifies their role as the sole Super Power in today’s international system.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Algerian Wa

    • 4114 Words
    • 17 Pages

    [ 8 ]. Brian Schmidt. “Competing Realists Conceptions of Power.” Journal of International Studies 33 (2005): 523-549…

    • 4114 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Does Power Matter

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How does power matter in world affairs? First, power is seen a means of influence governing the kinds of settlements that nations achieve, or circumstances nations must undergo. Second, power could construct political geography, varying the impact of physical distance and differentiating conflicts among nations that are possible from those that are very unlikely. Third, power may be viewed as the determinant for a state’s preferences, which may cause cooperation or opposition. These factors give states the capability to promote national interests, to win an international bargaining, and to shape the rules governing interaction in the global…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Realism vs. Liberalism

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Viotti, P; Kauppi, M. (1999) International Relations Theory. Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. (3rd) Needham Heights, US: Allyn and Bacon.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President and Congress

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The era of globalization has witnessed the growing influence of a number of unconventional international actors, from non-governmental organizations, to multi-national corporations, to global political movements. Traditional, state-centric definitions of foreign policy as "the policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states is no longer sufficient. Several alternative definitions are more helpful at highlighting aspects of foreign policies.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Power, Causation & Explanation Author(s): Terence Ball Reviewed work(s): Source: Polity, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Winter, 1975), pp. 189-214 Published by: Palgrave Macmillan Journals Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3234201 . Accessed: 17/09/2012 00:17…

    • 9866 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    September 2007. A previous version was presented at the 48th annual meeting of International Studies Association, Chicago, IL, USA, 28 February to 3 March 2007. We thank Hein Goemans and Håvard Strand for helpful discussions and comments. This is a preliminary draft of work in progress; Please ensure that you have the current version before citing. Kristian Skrede Gleditsch (corresponding author) is Reader, Department of Government, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK (email: ksg@essex.ac.uk). Andrea Ruggeri is a PhD Candidate, Department of Government, University of Essex (email: arugge@essex.ac.uk).…

    • 7521 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Complex Interdependence, the theory popularized by Koehane and Nye, proposes the subordination of the military power to the economic benefits that they will receive from cooperation with the states; the concept of interdependence, wherein the action of an actor in the international sphere affects the other actors in the system. This interconnectedness emphasized by the arrival of globalization, therefore isolation and separations are rarely possible except in the case of North Korea who successfully divorces itself from the world but comes at a great economic cost. This theory will help give an answer to the alarming issue by illustrating it into a comprehensible…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Am I

    • 2362 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The three theories of international relations, realism, liberalism, and constructivism, work in different ways to explain the workings of the world. This paper seeks to justify what makes me a self-designated constructivist. In examining the development of conflicts throughout the history by the taking a look the era of the World Wars as well as the more recent events of terrorism and the rise of China, I attempt to explain with the best arguments of each IR theory in my opinion, what it was that caused these conflicts, and adjudicate at the end why constructivism does in my opinion the best overall job in doing so.…

    • 2362 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hong Kong Protest

    • 2343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A realist sometimes names ‘structural realist’, for realists, the international system is defined by anarchy, which means there is no central authority (Waltz, 1979). States are considered as sovereign and autonomous of each other, and there is…

    • 2343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay will shed more light on the phases of international relations from the individual stage to the international stage.…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays