Preview

Differences And Similarities Between Knight And Samurai

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
93 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences And Similarities Between Knight And Samurai
The feudalism system was a lot alike to the knight and the samurai. An example is the relationship with the lord and the knights were that knights were willing to fight for land.And it was the same situation with the samurai and the daimyo. Another example of their federal system was that one was higher up the pyramid than the other .Samurai And Knights: were the similarities greater than the differences.The knight and the samurai hid have a lot in differences but their a likes and greater and more than in differences .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Knights Vs Samurai Dbq

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document E written by Sir Thomas Malory it says “ to be loyal to the king, to give mercy to those asking it…” In the piece “to give mercy to those asking it” meant that they would not hurt you if you asked for mercy. Therefore, if you were a knight and a samurai asked for mercy, you would not kill. Due to that belief, it gave the samurai’s an advantage. Also, in the same text it also mentions that the knights are to do no wicked deed. They could not do anything wrong or make a fool of themselves. It would not be right if they hurt…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai Dbq Analysis

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think that the Samurai would win in a battle against a knight. While knights ad samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the Samurai and this can be seen in weapons, training, and their honor code…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knights and Samurai have many similarities. They are different too, because of their culture, and skills. While they have differences and similarities they both would have a chance to win if they were at war. The Knights and Samurai have a 50, 50 chance to win because of their armor, training, and code.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The strucure of the japanese fuedal system and its structure is based off of a heiracy system, the Emporer being at the top, then the shogun, then the samurais, below them are the peasents and finaly the merchants. The Emperor was at the top of the Japanese feudal system and was the person that all of the people looked up to as the supreme ruler. However, the Emperor was a figurehead and held little political power compared to the Shogun who was probably the most important person in Japanese society. Although the Shogun was below the Emperor in the feudal system, but he was the one who put in the most work and effort. The Shogun was the military leader and was in charge of making the decisions for the armies, battles, etc. The Daimyos served the Shoguns and were the next class in the Japanese feudal system. The Daimyos were powerful figures who…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason why I think the similarities are greater than differences is social position. The reason why I think social position is because; “The life of a samurai was not his own but belonged entirely to his lord, and it was the duty of a (samurai) to consider this at all times….”. [Doc B]This…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The samurai (or bushi) were the soldiers of premodern Japan. They later created up the ruling military category that eventually became the best ranking social caste of the Edo amount (1603-1867). Samurai used a variety of weapons like bows and arrows, spears and guns, however their main weapon and image was the arm.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai Knights Dbq

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever wondered what the similarities and the differences were between the Samurai and knights? Samurai and knights were very strong warriors in the medieval era, they had different cultural ideas, but Samurai and Knight also had similarities. Samurai and Knights were similar, but also different in some areas. The similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at three areas, social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai and Knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint. The Japanese called their warriors Samurai, and the Europeans called their warriors Knights. They both swore oaths of loyalty to noble lords and fought to the death to defend them. This happened at the same time even though Japan and Europe were thousands of miles apart.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All woman out there if you want to protect yourself and not rely on a man then you should become a samurai but if you want protection and respect then marry a knight. During the Middle Ages in Feudal Japan and in Europe samurai and knights were two of the bravest warriors. It is important to compare these two because you can see who is more respectful or more powerful. Samurai were sent to defeat barbarians in Northern Honshu. Samurai worked for landowners and offered them protection and loyalty in exchange for land and rights. Knights lived in their lord's castle because they protected their lord. They lived in the lower floor of the castle with other knights because there was enough space there. In this essay I will compare the views on women of samurai and knights, the views on education of both warriors, and their code of conduct.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intro: Although the big empires, Europe and Japan were really successful feudalist empires and both had some similarities and differences during the 9th to 13th century, which made them unique empires in the world. Both of the empires have a similar concept of elite warriors, different treatment of women during the post-classical era, and a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system, which were the main reasons they became successful empires.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Europeans and the Japanese have many aspects of feudalism in common, but also many that differ. Their feudalisms are more differences than similarities. The differences include their cultural and political aspects. They have similarities in the social aspects.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Japan had an emperor, feudalism developed because the emperor united the clans. Before feudalism, Japan was inhabited by many different clans. Clans fought each other frequently. Lives were lived in fear of attack. People were unhappy before feudalism and they started fighting for land. Feudalism gave samurai land. Rich landowners gave land for labor and crops. Feudalism is the bond of loyalty between a lord and those to whom he has given land.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the Feudal and the Caste System stressed rankings in society and they each had a hierarchy. This however, was one of the many similarities and differences the two systems had. In the Caste system, people in each varna(social class) were born into his/her class and married within their own group. One could not move up the social ladder and one could only be one varna. In Feudalism, one could be a lord and a vassal at the same time one person could pledge allegiance to more than one lord at a time. Also, in the Caste system of India, the most important varna were the priests while in Feudalism, the king was at the top of the hierarchy. In feudalism, the lords and the knights made up the nobility which was similar in India's system, where the priests and warriors made up the nobility. In both, the class right below the emperor or king and the military are the most powerful and noble. In the caste system , women had hardly any rights and could not be priests or warriors, therefore they could never be in the upper class. In the feudal system, although ladies had few rights, women could be in the nobility. The noblewomen mainly sewed and raised the children. Likewise, the women in India were confined to household tasks as well. In both systems, there was no central government, in feudalism, each lord had his own rules on his manor and in India, the Kshatriyas, led the government, which was a council of elders for each village. There was no such thing as one government, instead there were several that were independent from each other. But unlike the feudal hierarchy where the king is on the top, in the caste system, the class after the first class is the one that heads the government. Also, in the feudal and the caste system, most people were the slaves. In the caste system, more than half the population consisted of the Pariahs(slaves) and in the feudal system, most people were serfs that were bound to the land. The serfs, the lords, the vassals and everybody had a…

    • 444 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    (AGG) Fighting for the welfare of their kingdom, knights have always been feared by their enemies. (BS-1) The training to become a knight and all the other activities he engaged in were very hard and required a lot of training. (BS-2) Feudalism and manorialism benefited knights, by giving them food and land in return for loyalty and protection. (BS-3) Feudalism also enabled the kingdom to build a functioning military. (BS-4) Lastly the church adapted and used the great chain of being to their advantage. (TS) Knight would affect feudalism by giving protection to the kingdom in exchange for food and land.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays