Preview

Similarities Between The Shogun And The Japanese Feudal System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
729 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between The Shogun And The Japanese Feudal System
The strucure of the japanese fuedal system and its structure is based off of a heiracy system, the Emporer being at the top, then the shogun, then the samurais, below them are the peasents and finaly the merchants. The Emperor was at the top of the Japanese feudal system and was the person that all of the people looked up to as the supreme ruler. However, the Emperor was a figurehead and held little political power compared to the Shogun who was probably the most important person in Japanese society. Although the Shogun was below the Emperor in the feudal system, but he was the one who put in the most work and effort. The Shogun was the military leader and was in charge of making the decisions for the armies, battles, etc. The Daimyos served the Shoguns and were the next class in the Japanese feudal system. The Daimyos were powerful figures who …show more content…
To compare the ranks they are very similar I.E the merchants in feudal japan were similar to those of the European one (Serfs/Peseants). Feudal Japanese and European societies were built on a system of hereditary classes. The nobles were at the top, followed by the warriors, with tenant farmers or serfs below them, there was very little social mobility. Between the classes.

Economic benefits were exchanged between the different peoples through multiple ways, the peasants made tools, weapons and food for the samurais and the daimyos and the shoguns, in producing these things for the other groups of people they were repaid in protection by the samurais and the daimyos provided land for the peasants to farm on and grow crops to provide for their fellow in which made the lives of everyone in the Japanese systems better, and this was set in place so that there was a service that went from one person to another to make the Japanese feudal system

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    During the Tokugawa period of Japan a singular map consisted of numerous feudal towns and villages each ruled by individual daimyo lords. The list of individual domains was enormous, so too was the list of cultures, traditions, and material goods specific to the domains and feudal families that lived within the domain’s borders. The right to govern each domain was given to a daimyo lord by the Tokugawa Shogunate; in return, each ruling vassal was required to complete a “form of feudal service.” Known as alternate attendance the Shogun imposed this requirement as a means of political and economic control which restricted individual daimyo rule and reinforced the overall power of the Shogunate. While alternate attendance was a mechanism of political control that promoted peace throughout Japan, Constantine Nomikos Vaporis illustrated the unintentional effects of the hegemon’s policy in Tour of Duty. Vaporis argued that alternate attendance, while considered a “disciplinary institution” by other Japanese scholars, was nevertheless “instrumental in producing a population with a high level of shared culture and experience.”…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. How did the political structure of the Tokugawa Shogunate influence the economic development of…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both based on relationships between lords and vassals. In japan, lords are reffered to as shoguns and vassals were daimyo, military governors and stewards, Daimyos had their own vassals as well. This was the same in…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Japan Study Guide

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    | In doing this the Shogun ensured the subservience of the Daimyao. This system opened up a lot of commerce in both the traveling route and in Edo. It was an effective use of political control because it created a “hostage” situation with the families of the Daimyaos ensuring loyalty.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Women were taught to slay themselves rather than dishonor the family line by getting raped…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1450s, Japan was a place of turmoil and unrest. Angered by the high rents they had to pay, peasants began revolting against their lords. To quell this chaos, the lords began hiring samurai to put down the rebellions. Taking advantage of the situation, the samurai began making demands of these lords so that by the end of these revolts, most of the new daimyo were former samurai. With these new daimyo in power, they began to clash with one another. This infighting erupted into a civil war that eventually ended with no apparent victor. This became known as the “Era of Independent Lords”.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    European and Japanese feudalism were similar in that they had a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system. The Japanese classes were the shogun (similar to a king in Europe), who held all the power. Then the daimyo, who owned the land, (similar to the lords and nobles in Europe), divided their land to the lesser samurais (similar to the European knights), and the same to the peasants, artisans, farmers, and merchants (similar to the serfs in Europe). In both Europe and Japan, the hierarchy was held together as a land-for-loyalty exchange. Both Japanese and European feudalism was based on mutual obligation, but the Japanese problems of internal attacks led to them begin using a feudal system for military aspects, while the Europeans foreign invasions led to them begin using a feudal system to protect and economically grow.…

    • 566 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Japanese war tactics and technologies modernised promptly in the 15th and 16th century. Subsequently, warriors were in high demand. It was also the era when ninja warriors specialised in unconventional warfare, were most effective. The country was reunited in the late 1500s, and the social caste system was established during the Edo Period that placed the samurai at the top, followed by the farmers, artisans and merchants consequently. During this time, the samurai were forced to live in castle towns, were the only ones allowed to own and carry…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai were a little higher up than Knights in the feudal social order. In the social order in feudal Japan if you were a Samurai you were a warrior who owed loyalty and military service to Dalmyos for land or regular payment. All of the Samurai plus their family made up about ten percent of Japans population. Now, Knights on the other hand were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to a lord for land. There were about twelve thousand Knights in England and Normany France in the twelfth century. (Documents A, B)…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intro: Although the big empires, Europe and Japan were really successful feudalist empires and both had some similarities and differences during the 9th to 13th century, which made them unique empires in the world. Both of the empires have a similar concept of elite warriors, different treatment of women during the post-classical era, and a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system, which were the main reasons they became successful empires.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One political difference is their political structures. Both depended on bonds of personal loyalty and had cases of traitors and traitorous betrayals. The lords of Europe were at the top of the class and controlled the peasants. This lord-vassal relationship was seen as mutual and contractual. It was also ultimate and absolute loyalty on behalf of the vassal. This relationship was legalistic, meaning they followed a set of laws. In Japan there was more emphasis on morality than law. They did not have the same set laws that the Europeans did There was not as much room for a concept of political rights. The Japanese saw the importance of lineage and honor in determining power and prestige and securing ownership of property. The Japanese avoided the hereditary…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The differences between feudal Japan and feudal Europe show some unique aspects of their everyday life, which can be compared also to show a few similarities between the two. The feudal west and the feudal and the feudal east are more different in their ways, beliefs, and lifestyle than they are alike to each other. The west and east are different about their view on women; also the two are different about how they believe in sacrificial ceremonies. Feudal Europe and feudal Japan are similar in ways as they both have a warrior class. Japan’s class of warriors is the Samurai while the Europeans count on Knights. This shows that feudal Japan and Europe have both similarities and differences that express each way of life.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Japan had an emperor, feudalism developed because the emperor united the clans. Before feudalism, Japan was inhabited by many different clans. Clans fought each other frequently. Lives were lived in fear of attack. People were unhappy before feudalism and they started fighting for land. Feudalism gave samurai land. Rich landowners gave land for labor and crops. Feudalism is the bond of loyalty between a lord and those to whom he has given land.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During Edo era the society was rigidly divided into classes based upon Confucian values. At the very top was placed the emperor, considered a heir of the god Amaterasu, next under him was placed the sogun, the actual leader, which was invested by the emperor to protect Japan, he was followed by daymio and samurai, military figures that were placed in charge of administering the country, followed by farmers and artisans. Merchants, accumulated great wealth in cities like Edo, Osaka, and Kyoto. In this structure the samurai class, was forbidden from engaging in profitable trade or farming, the peasant’s role was to produce basic foodstuffs. Peasants were to give a good portion of their products in tax to support the ruling classes. Artisans used their skills to craft functional and decorative items. And merchants, placed at the bottom because it was considered that they had money without doing any actual work, offered goods that could not be acquired through any other means.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the Feudal and the Caste System stressed rankings in society and they each had a hierarchy. This however, was one of the many similarities and differences the two systems had. In the Caste system, people in each varna(social class) were born into his/her class and married within their own group. One could not move up the social ladder and one could only be one varna. In Feudalism, one could be a lord and a vassal at the same time one person could pledge allegiance to more than one lord at a time. Also, in the Caste system of India, the most important varna were the priests while in Feudalism, the king was at the top of the hierarchy. In feudalism, the lords and the knights made up the nobility which was similar in India's system, where the priests and warriors made up the nobility. In both, the class right below the emperor or king and the military are the most powerful and noble. In the caste system , women had hardly any rights and could not be priests or warriors, therefore they could never be in the upper class. In the feudal system, although ladies had few rights, women could be in the nobility. The noblewomen mainly sewed and raised the children. Likewise, the women in India were confined to household tasks as well. In both systems, there was no central government, in feudalism, each lord had his own rules on his manor and in India, the Kshatriyas, led the government, which was a council of elders for each village. There was no such thing as one government, instead there were several that were independent from each other. But unlike the feudal hierarchy where the king is on the top, in the caste system, the class after the first class is the one that heads the government. Also, in the feudal and the caste system, most people were the slaves. In the caste system, more than half the population consisted of the Pariahs(slaves) and in the feudal system, most people were serfs that were bound to the land. The serfs, the lords, the vassals and everybody had a…

    • 444 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays