Difference Between Tea Party Movement And Occupy Wall Street
The Tea Party movement began on Feb. 19, 2009, when Rick Santelli, the CNBC financial journalist who reports from the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, ranted against the government bailing out homeowners who couldn’t pay their mortgages.
The Occupy Wall Street protest got going two and a half years later, when editors at the anti-corporate Canadian magazine Adbusters were inspired by events in the Middle East to call for a mass demonstration against the financial industry on Sept. 19, 2011.
The Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street are two very different movements—with seemingly opposite views on almost every issue. Predictably, their views on education—and the government’s role in making it available to all—are quite different. Those origins tell you a lot about how the two …show more content…
However, it’s possible to piece together a general view based on current events and statements by Occupy Wall Street participants.
Overall, the movement has made the Republican Party more rigidly right-wing without producing any substantive accomplishments. Its influence may now be on the wane. The GOP seems poised to nominate a candidate the Tea Party doesn’t like.
Occupy Wall Street is probably at an earlier stage of its lifecycle, but already pointed toward a similar role: energizing the liberal base and pulling the Democratic Party to the left, without making anything in particular happen.
In many cases, it’s hard to see a parallel to Occupy Wall Street, which has no major media champion or institutional support. However; Occupy Wall Street, which raises a wide variety of complaints states Bankers should be punished; they should be paid less; and excessive pay to CEOS should cease, government should regulate them more aggressively; because society is becoming more unequal; people are out of work; money should have no sway in politics; and capitalism isn’t working;
The Occupy Wall Street protest got going two and a half years later, when editors at the anti-corporate Canadian magazine Adbusters were inspired by events in the Middle East to call for a mass demonstration against the financial industry on Sept. 19, 2011.
The Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street are two very different movements—with seemingly opposite views on almost every issue. Predictably, their views on education—and the government’s role in making it available to all—are quite different. Those origins tell you a lot about how the two …show more content…
However, it’s possible to piece together a general view based on current events and statements by Occupy Wall Street participants.
Overall, the movement has made the Republican Party more rigidly right-wing without producing any substantive accomplishments. Its influence may now be on the wane. The GOP seems poised to nominate a candidate the Tea Party doesn’t like.
Occupy Wall Street is probably at an earlier stage of its lifecycle, but already pointed toward a similar role: energizing the liberal base and pulling the Democratic Party to the left, without making anything in particular happen.
In many cases, it’s hard to see a parallel to Occupy Wall Street, which has no major media champion or institutional support. However; Occupy Wall Street, which raises a wide variety of complaints states Bankers should be punished; they should be paid less; and excessive pay to CEOS should cease, government should regulate them more aggressively; because society is becoming more unequal; people are out of work; money should have no sway in politics; and capitalism isn’t working;