Preview

Polarization and Cultuarl Divison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1085 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Polarization and Cultuarl Divison
Polarization and Cultural Division In the readings of the four articles, they have address the problem with polarization in the people and cultural division. In Wilson's and Fiornia's articles they both mention how there is a deep division in America but Fiornia believes that the American public are more concerned about solving their political problems than the division. According to Wilson, he's view are some-what opposite, he believes that this cultural division will not fade since it was born when this country started. In Judis's article, he also mentions the division in the American public, but he chooses the popular group that has the media's eye which is the Tea Parties. He mentions how there is a division between the Tea Parties and the government and that some of their problems will fade. In the article of my choosing which was Partisan Mood: Polarization and the Dynamics of Mass Party Preferences, was about how the American public are categorized in political groups or parties due to their personal, political or religious views. Even though some of these articles are about the division between small political parties or the division of the Republicans and Democrats, there are still a division in America which can be harmful to trying to keep the United States united. The chief factors that contributed to the polarization in Judis argument, was the conservative movements due to the political force, "There were more protests in April, and, by the time of the massive September twelve protest last year, the Tea Party movement had officially arrived as a political force."(Judis, 457) The political groups that Judis mentions about throughout his argument were the Tea Party groups, whose views are more moved to the economic issues."... The Tea Partiers have been moved to action by economic issues, but they share the outlook of social economic views."(458) Now, according to Wilson, the chief factors that contribute to the culture division in the United

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    There Are Now Two Americas

    • 2936 Words
    • 11 Pages

    America is a country that is now utterly divided when it comes to its society, its economy, its…

    • 2936 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States Congress

    • 5336 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The book describes partisan polarization as a vote in which a majority of voting democrats oppose a majority of voting republicans. Congress today seems more polarized than it was up until the 1970s because of social issues such as abortion. Democrats tends to be more liberal and republicans more conservative.…

    • 5336 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IsaacS Period 4 LEQ

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A few decades after America won its freedom, unity was much desired amongst populous. Disunity usually occurs with two people or parties with different points of view, value systems, or class opinion clash; that is exactly what took place in the early 19th century America. Political parties hindered the development of national unity in the United States between 1790 and 1840 because of party polarity and sectionalism.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He claimed that the country was one peacefully cohesive body. One major difference that breaks Thomas Paine’s claim is the fact that the “United” States of America are not really united together anymore. Americans have created distinct divisions between themselves causing frequent turmoil and crises. Aside from the racial and religious divisions that Americans created, there are several other divisions that are causing conflict. For instance, the separate political parties are most definitely contributing to America’s de-unification (Thomas). The heated controversy concerning the Democratic Party and the opposing Republican Party not only separate public officials making politics more challenging, but they also divide the regular citizen population based on how they choose which side they favor (Thomas). Favoring different political parties leads to many problems in the long run. Another cause for division is different views of political power. Some states, such as Texas have even threatened to secede from the union because of conflicting views on political issues, such as the level of power of the state government has versus the federal government (Thomas). The opposing views on politics and power have caused obvious separation in American…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Also in 1828 the deemed "tariff of abomination" clearly showed that the division of political parties led to the division of America, in terms of national unity because the political parties had different sectional interests and not national interests.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question of whether divided party control of the American national government is an advantage or disadvantage has long been debated. Many Americans agree with Woodrow Wilson's philosophy, "You cannot compound a successful government out of antagonisms." In other words, a legislative and executive branch controlled by the same political party have a stronger tie and connection and encounters fewer stumbling blocks as they move forward with national policies and issues. There is a sense that divided party control contributes to counter productive law making.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that political parties now actually have more political differences within the parties than between them this can be argued due to the fact that both the Democrat and the Republican parties have their conservative and liberal/moderate wings. For example the Democratic Party is divided into groupings such as the southern conservative Democrats with conservative views on most social, economic and foreign issues whereas the northern liberal democrats such as the late Kennedy, with liberal views on policy issues, and from 1980s the ‘New Democrats’ as well as Gore’s Democratic Leadership Council, highlighting a variety of differences within a political party in America. Similarly the Republicans have also been internally divided, having a variety of splits to do with social and fiscal conservatives, compassionate conservatives and neo conservatives. Therefore the Republican Party is often split between its more conservative and more moderate wings of the party.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Two broad coalitions with more ideogical differences within them than between them’ relates on how there are different kinds of people within each party so in the Republican party there is liberal and moderate republicans like the governor of New Jersey Chris Christie to the far right hard liners which procide within in the tea party which isn’t an organisation, but is just a group of hard lining conservatives such as Sarah Palin. This is the same within the Democrats there are some quite liberal moderate democrats in which Obama is described as and the Nacy Pelosi the last speaker in the house of representatives and the first women speaker, and then there are some hard lining democrats which are known as the blue dog democrats and are from the southern states. The same can be seen in the UK within the Conservative party which has a group of backbenchers which go by the 1922 committee which are far right conservatives, with a lot of power and money which are very influential and can cause revolt on the Torry backbenches the same is with the tea party they were partly responsible for the shutdown of the US government due to the new health care being trying to be pushed through and the new budgeting bill.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The defining political fact of our time is the division of America (Greenberg).” This is how George Stephanopoulos, a television journalist and former political adviser, summarizes the reality of American politics. One reason for this is America’s two-party system. These parties are the Democrats and the Republicans. Some people believe they are good, but others see them as destructive and useless. Political parties are bad for the United States because they are limited and cause national division.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the rich and the poor have separated. The blue states had higher incomes, higher end…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly the votes cast for the Parties would imply that there are more differences between that within. 89% of voters who say they are liberal voted for Obama in the 2008 general election whereas 78% of voters who said that they were ‘ideologically conservative; voted for McCain. The values of the Republican Party tend to attract businesses and corporate interest, higher income voters as well as rural small town suburban voters and religious groups. The Democratic party tend to attract collar workers, trade unionists and less affluent public sector workers. The stark differences within the groups that the two parties attract are so diverse it would suggest that the parties are clearly having more differences between than within.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For over 60 years, there has been a profound separation in the United States government. The main source of division is between the Democratic and Republican parties. These parties are said to be polarized parties. In this case, polarization is when political parties stand for a different position depending on certain topics. The United States cant seem to come to an agreement with anything because these parties are on two totally different pages in almost every aspect of the government, spending, racial and social issues, war and law just to name a few. The differences between these two parties has caused the government to go into an uproar. The question that stands in front of us is how did American politics become so polarized, and can this polarization lead to changes in the American system?…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Polarity Management

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: James C. Collins & Jerry I. Porras. (2002). Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (Harper Business Essentials).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Incoming graduates of political science are aware of the restriction that the structure of the government imbeds, including the branches of the government generating unfair control of power in the executive branch, and partisan polarization. America’s basic construction of government, the three branches in parallel with the checks and balance system, creates problems such as a single executive leader inducing unfair policy making, and two main political party advancing partisan polarization. Partisan polarization is the ideology that an individual’s stance on political controversies are limiting of their party identification: republican, democrat. For example, controversies today revealing partisan polarizations are: equal reproductive rights,…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Polarity Management is by definition a "problem" or an issue that requires a solution. The goal of a problem is to find a fix to the current situation and move forward to a new reality without being required to ever look back. However, a "polarity" is an issue that needs to be addressed, but the "solution" is not one that can survive independently and will actually still require support from the original issue. Polarity Management can be a very powerful tool when used at the right place and time. The task is knowing when and where to use it. Polarity Management does not imply there are no problems to be solved because there are. PM is mostly used when the difficulty is ongoing and the two poles are interdependent. If you have an employee who is stealing from the company, do fire or have this employee arrested, the problem would be solved and would no longer be ongoing. This is not an example of a polarity to manage. If your company is failing to maximize the synergy of your workgroups but individuals aren't receiving the recognition they feel they deserve, then you have a polarity problem that needs to be managed. Many companies now believe the solution to a majority of their work-based problems is a shift to a more team oriented workplace. Teams are being credited for their ability to: create a synergistic effect, provide a common direction, provide mutual support, appreciate every individual's job, and create a cohesive unit. If this is true for teams, than they must shift to a team oriented workplace must be the answer. The "problem" is solved. Teams are not the answer for everything, because when they focus on the individual you get: individual creativity and initiative, an entrepreneurial spirit, fewer meetings and individual freedom. If focusing on the individual is the right thing to do, then there is a perceived problem. This is because with an individual focus you get: people who feel…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays