Why do they meet there? Socrates was accused of impiety, of not believing in the gods of the city, to invent new and corrupting youth. His case falls within its jurisdiction. At the age of seventy years, it has never had to deal with the justice of Athens. Euthyphron and continues his father for murder and his case also falls within the jurisdiction of the archon-king, to the extent that a murder may lead to the entire community a defilement of religious nature. Why Euthyphron …show more content…
Euthyphro is a priest, a specialist in religious matters and claiming his highly science. His official role in the city is to examine the merits of the charges as those against Socrates. For a long time it was considered that this soothsayer embodied religious orthodoxy, popular traditional religious beliefs and Plato wanted to show that such a representative was unable to define piety, and thus prevent that Socrates was condemned for impiety. Socrates victim zealots of traditional religion. This thesis has been criticized in the early 20th century and has emerged a very different interpretation that reigned supreme for seventy years: Euthyphro would rather eccentric, fanatic distinguishing clearly the average religiosity of its citizens ... The process that initiates his father aroused the disapproval of his family but also his fellow citizens …show more content…
philosophy is noted that it is not confused with religion. The philosophy requires personal use of reflection. It carries with it the seeds of diversity and dialogue. The dialogue between philosophers themselves is essential; that is why Plato takes theses of his predecessors. Please use it as a stylistic form that is neither poetry nor prose, but dialogues which speech of others is staged. Plato never speaks in his own name in his texts. This demonstrates that the philosopher invents nothing, he just look what already exists. Equally closely, Socrates condemned anthropomorphism and anthropocentrism of the popular and common conception of religion. For Socrates Divine is not an aspect of the human, not a creation of the human. Being righteous is to recognize the absolutely divine other, recognize him as any other. Variables religious practices are only images of piety, halfway between religion and superstition. If piety is not based on a moral requirement (what Socrates called his famous daimon, voice of the higher consciousness), then it is at best an expression of social conformity, useful to the city, but because unjustifiable based on relative values. At worst, godliness refers only fear or ignorance. The final ascent that demands the dialectic does not seek an intellectual intuition of truth but rather an overview, block. It requires the examination of a final report that of all the scientific truths