Preview

Did Bad King John Desrve His Reputation?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
604 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Did Bad King John Desrve His Reputation?
Did Bad King John Deserve his Reputation?

In this assessment, I will talk about whether King John was really as bad as people say he was by looking carefully at different sources and evidence.

To many, John was cruel, greedy and ultimately a failure as King. John's reputation as England's worst monarch is partly due to hostile chroniclers, but also to an unfortunate reign.In the beginning of his reign (1202) John's nephew died and everyone thought John was to blame and so they rebelled.In the early 13th century, a group of monks said that when John died, no-one mourned his passing. A TV show called Most Evil compares John to Adolf Hitler, a mass-murderer who committed genocide, and Dracula, a semi-fictional character, as one of the most evil men who ever lived. The Disney film called Robin Hood portrays John as a greedy,self-centered king who will do anything to get his own way, and he is often shown counting his money. They also make out that everyone in England hates him. However, this film was based on legend which isn't really a reliable source of evidence.

People might think this opinion is true because John did many bad things in his reign, such as raising taxes and supposedly killing his nephew. The monks didn't like him because he annoyed the Pope, so they wrote exaggerated things about him that people believe today. Most Evil and the film Robin Hood were probably also exaggerated as they were meant for entertainment.

Because of this, more people who have watched the Robin Hood TV series and the Robin Hood Disney film now believe that John really was bad.

John also fell out with the pope in 1207. They quarrelled about who should become the Archbishop of Canterbury. The Pope excommunicated John and put England under a Church law that stated that no christening or marriage would be legal until the time the pope said that they would be. Church law said that only christened people could get to Heaven while children born out of marriage were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    APUSH Chapter 4 Outline

    • 1878 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Charles II and James II issued decrees allowing Catholics to hold high office and woship openly. English tolerated James’ conversion to Catholicism because heirs (Mary and Anne) were Anglican.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theme: John’s father permanently altered John’s mind at a young age, resulting in a John who deceived himself and others because it was the only way for him to feel like he had a normal life.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Papal Intervention

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before 1213 john and Langton relationship was based on the way he was imposed on Canterbury (led to interdict of England 1208 then johns excommunication 1209…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A child born in the turn of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, at the end of the year 1600, was to inherit this hitherto unquestioned office, and apparently to inherit it undiminished in reputation or effect. He was to come to the kingship of his fathers in true descent of the Blood Royal, and , destined as it would seem, to administer as those before him had administered and to hand on this same power and majesty to his posterity. Yet in the lifetime of that child- and it was not a long one, monarchy in England crumbled, or rather was destroyed. He himself acted that tragedy and took the tragic part therein. First he was thwarted by his more powerful subjects through his early years, from the day when as a young man of twenty-five he came to his own when he had not long passed his fortieth year. They gradually destroyed his national forces, they triumphed over him, they belittle him by one humiliation after another, and at last, before he had reached his fiftieth year, they put him to death. With him died the English monarchy- he was the last ruling King of England, the last who goverened as Kings had goverened for untold years. His virtues destroyed the Crown of England and the power thereof.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV, also known as Le Gran Monarque and the Sun God, was not indeed such a good king for France. The reign of Louis XIV was hurtful in many ways to France and its people. First of all, Louis XIV financially destroyed France by doing things that he thought would help but just hurt France in the long run. Louis was constantly at war with another country, which not only hurt France financially, because wars were very expensive during that time, but it also depleted France¡¯s once massive army. He also persecuted the Huguenots and fifty thousand of them fled from France, many of them skilled and very well educated, which also hurt France. It seemed as if the way Louis XIV ruled France was to mainly help himself, and if he did want to make France greater, he failed to do so throughout his reign.…

    • 986 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legend of Robin Hood has been around for nearly one thousand years. For the past several hundred years, Robin and his Merry Men have been known for stealing from the rich, particularly tax collectors, and giving to the poor; however, because this is still stealing and Robin had also killed at least one of the king’s deer, Robin and his men were known as outlaws. While they may have been outlaws, Robin Hood and his Merry Men were more like knights in the way that they dealt honorably with opponents in battle, defended the weak and helpless, and protected women and children.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John printed his name in the Magna Carta but didn't go along with it. John started a rampage across England because the barons wanted him to stick to the Manga Charta. Eventually king John started burning down castles and rebelling against the people's wishes. In 1216 king John died and John's son Henry became king. Someone reissued the charta, to show that the new king would keep their demands ( unfortunately it didn't work) Then in 1217 someone reissued it as a peace treaty for the civil war, it was…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay is about who should have been king in 1066. Edward the Confessor died on 5th January 1066. The King of England was usually the son or another close relation of the previous king. Edward had no children or any surviving brother or sister. There were four people waiting to be the next king. They were Edgar Etheling, Harold Godwinson, William Duke of Normandy and Harald Hadrada. Only one of the four people could be the King of England at any one time.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The poor believe he was a hero because he gave them the extra tax money that was increased on the rich. This shows he had no care for the people that help him in Parliament and in other areas of managing England, such as controlling land.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Killed the King?

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King Philip II of Spain was murdered, but by who? With a sum of at least 20 suspects that would have strong reasoning to kill him, who did it? He was found poisoned in bed early one morning, his murderer escaped his castle never to be found. However, upon further investigation, 10 highly interesting clues were found in a burlap sack stuffed behind a statue of the Virgin and Child. Those clues consisted of: A map from Orelius’ Typus Orbus Terrarum, keys to manacles, silver coins, potatoes, Las Casas’ Apologetic History, Elizabeth I’s speech at Tilbury, a Holy Bible in Dutch, Columbus’ Journal, Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises, and a note saying, “It’s working, my friends…”.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    My interpretation differs to the traditional story of king john but it is essential that you know it before I can go on with my argument. Firstly, he supposedly had his first place to rule (Ireland) at the age of eighteen though it also says he lost that part of the empire shortly after because he insulted the Irish barons. Secondly, he plotted against his own brother to take his land and crown whilst he was away on a crusade. Also, he had an opposition to the throne, his twelve year old nephew called Arthur, and in 1202 he was captured and imprisoned which the people didn’t like and soon after a rumour was spread that john murdered Arthur in a drunken rage. Another thing was that john quarrelled with the pope over who should be the archbishop of Canterbury and it ended up with the churches property being taken away and john being excommunicated. Finally, john raised the taxes in England to fund an attack on France to regain his empire though his plan did not succeed and his army was crushed at the battle of bouvines by King Philip II. The traditional story of king john shows that king john was a failure, but how much of it is true?…

    • 1507 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, those against, argue that no King would have been able to maintain that realm forever and would, at some point, lose it. This, conveniently enough, happened to occur whilst John was reigning. They also mention frequently…

    • 1773 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source I; from a recent history book, states how hard John tried to be a good King despite not being a popular choice at the start of his reign. John’s brother had named John as his heir and this was a very important consideration for the next king at the time. Source I says that John was merciful to helpless people, including women, children and the poor. There must be some evidence of John being good to these people. He may have been a harsh or strong soldier to people in battle but not to the other people. Source I also says that John was a poor soldier because he lost the war in France, but he was in a very difficult position at the time and was just trying to keep the lands his brother won. This source is trying to think about other evidence about the King instead of just saying he was all bad. It is more recent and is trying to be fairer showing a different side to John that…

    • 1663 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Robin Hood and Feudalism

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    ROBIN HOOD In the years of King Richard the Lionheart (1189-1199) there lived a brave and intelligent man called Robin Hood. He was a feared outlaw, who loved liberty and hated oppression. He took the law into his own hands and robbed the rich to give to the poor. People loved him and thought of him as a justice-maker. In time he acquired a heroic reputation and came to represent the ideal of heroism of his age. Stories about him and his closest friends Friar Tuck, Little John, and Maid Marian may be found in the time. They say that Robin Hood and his companions lived in Sherwood Forest, near Nottingham. They were called the ‘merry men’ and used to wear green clothes, a particular shade of green, called ‘Lincoln green’. They also say that Robin’s outlaws were very well-organized and skilful in their attacks. They were very disciplined and obeyed strict rules of behavior.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Yellow Wallpaper

    • 1134 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout both the film and short story “The Yellow Wallpaper, John is portrayed as the villain, or antagonist. He is viewed in this way because his treatment of the narrator, or his wife, goes terribly wrong. His actions prove that he had good intentions for his wife the entire time, but his controlling…

    • 1134 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays