Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Was Louis XIV A Good Or Bad Monarch To France?

Good Essays
986 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Louis XIV A Good Or Bad Monarch To France?
Louis XIV, also known as Le Gran Monarque and the Sun God, was not indeed such a good king for France. The reign of Louis XIV was hurtful in many ways to France and its people. First of all, Louis XIV financially destroyed France by doing things that he thought would help but just hurt France in the long run. Louis was constantly at war with another country, which not only hurt France financially, because wars were very expensive during that time, but it also depleted France¡¯s once massive army. He also persecuted the Huguenots and fifty thousand of them fled from France, many of them skilled and very well educated, which also hurt France. It seemed as if the way Louis XIV ruled France was to mainly help himself, and if he did want to make France greater, he failed to do so throughout his reign.

The things that Louis XIV did throughout his reign over France used up much of France¡¯s wealth. The thing he did that hurt the most was building his palace and capitol at Versailles. This palace spanned across a third of a mile with hundreds of fountains and other great and expensive things were built in this palace. This took enormous amounts of money to build. His whole plan to keep the high nobility in one place and neutralize their political power with endless ceremonies and having them live a court life succeeded but was not worth all the money and time he had put into it. The money he used could have been put to better use to help the country, not only on himself and the high nobles. Also, during a time of famine, crop failure, and bitter cold, Louis raised the taxes immensely to stave off bankruptcy but brought about greater misery on the common people of France.

Louis XIV used much of the country¡¯s money and its huge military on wars that were many times unnecessary. He was too overconfident and believed that he could regain France¡¯s ¡°natural frontiers¡± along the Rhine and the Alps. He wanted to remake the huge multinational empire that Charlemagne once ruled. He wanted France to be the influence in all the countries of Europe. In the first two wars, it looked as if he was actually going to be able to accomplish this feat. France¡¯s power and prestige was at its peak, having a great influence in many places, especially to the German princes who tried to copy the standards of Versailles. Louis had built up a magnificent army and it seemed as if there could be no other army who could beat the French. But when alliances were made, things turned around for Louis and the French. The next two battles were hard on the French. These alliances and leagues were harder for France to beat and the French army was affected badly. At the end of his third battle, there was an agreement to hold to the status quo and nothing changed for France. His final war was the Spanish Succession. He was trying to be king of Spain since the king of Spain had died with no heir left behind. And so the French once again fought with another team of alliances and soon. All this fighting only devastated the French both economically and also with respect to the population of people in France. When both sides had enough losses, they ended with a treaty at Utrecht. This was a typical balance of power peace. So at the end of all his wars and fighting, Louis pretty much ended up with what he started with relating to the French borders and French influence. All this fighting was fatally flawed for Louis¡¯s reign over France. All this fighting only devastated the French both economically and in respect to the population in France.

Louis XIV attacked the rights of the French Protestants, or the Huguenots. He neglected the Edict of Nantes, which gave rights to the Protestants, some of these rights were full liberty of private worship, liberty of public worship wherever it had previously been granted and its extension to numerous other localities and to estates of Protestant nobles were given full civil rights including the right to hold public office. All the persecution of the Protestants by Louis caused approximately fifty thousand Huguenot families to leave France. Among these people there were many industrious and skilled workers, sailors, soldiers, officers, and other useful citizens were the backbone to Frances economic and social success as in any other country. And other countries welcomed all those who fled since they would help the economy of that country instead of France. Of course there were still other workers and soldiers in France, both Huguenots who put up with the persecution and Catholics, but a great percentage of the number of workers in France left for another country and hurt the French badly.

Louis XIV most likely wanted to help France as much as he could but it seems as though he hurt it more, as he thought he was helping France. He economically destroyed France, using money carelessly and ending up with a huge debt that Louis XV had to deal with, especially with the construction of Versailles. Secondly, he tried to help France by extending its borders and making France the most influential country in Europe but the cost of French lives and the finance put into these wars were not worth the little extension he was able to make. And the harsh persecution of the Huguenots led to less workers in France and more in other countries since the majority of them fled to different countries along with their skills. Over all, the one known as Le Gran Monarque and the Sun King was actually a king who weakened France and left it for his successors to take care of the problems and debts that formed over time as he ruled France.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    For how many years did Louis XIV reign, and after 1614, how many years was it until the next time the Estates General was called to…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis realised the amount of debt France had was spiralling out of control. Louis as a result sold tens of thousands of official juridical and administrative post. This shows how dire the situation…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1 Sarah Seng History 130 Chapter 15 Summary April 23, 2018 This chapter beings with a tale about the Marquis of Canillac who did not have a good reputation in the land. Because of his reign, he was able to collect taxes on special occasions, but abused this privilege by collecting taxes annually. This ruler was influenced by Louis XIV and his extremely long reign.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Louis Xiv Effective

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He lost four wages, on four wars. Because of that, France went into bankruptcy. France was at war for 30 years under the rule of Louis XIV. Louis XIV toughest war was the Spanish succession. His grandson inherited Spain, along with all of its possessions. He wanted to unite with him, which would give him other countries, islands and colonies to own. One of the main reasons why Louis XIV lost the wars he did was because of the balance of power. He was much more powerful than the countries he was about to go to war with, smartly, the European countries allied up with each other; balancing out the power between them and France. With the European powers allying to prevent Louis from uniting Spain and France together, they overpowered France. Louis agreed to the Peace of Utrecht; Spain and France crowns could never unite, giving the allied Europeans what they wanted. If Louis had won, he would have control of Spain’s Territories; of other small countries and American colonies. Putting in a great amount of money and losing the wars was not something Louis had intended, because of this, France was greatly in…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He collected taxes without the consent of the estates general in order establish many things, fund a series of wars, build a bigger and stronger military and to build his palace, the Palace of Versailles, when it was built he insisted that the nobles spend more time there (Doc 2). This eventually led the nobles into debt because they spent most of their time and money at the Palace of Versailles. The nobles being in debt meant that they lost status and power, which ultimately fed the basis for the French Revolution. Document 3 states; “The aftermath of the revocation was disastrous for France. Many of those who abjured [gave up] their Protestant religion repented of their weakness.”(Doc 3) This demonstrates that the removal of the Edict of Nantes drove people insane because it granted the people France substantial rights, however when the rights were removed by Louis XIV people became infuriated, which is another reason to why the French Revolution occurred. Fundamentally, the actions that Louis XIV took had a great impact towards his people. His actions ultimately led the people of France initiate the French Revolution, which left France and its people at a vulnerable…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Louis Xiv Important

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages

    When Louis XIV began his reign in 1643, France's capital was on the move, undergoing one of the greatest periods of expansion in its history. Louis was a young king with a great sense of style and history, and decided to make both himself and his country legendary. In the sixteenth century, the French were not thought of as the most elegant or sophisticated European nation, but by the end of the early eighteenth century France had a firm hold on culture, style, and luxury living.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV believed that one king should have power and control over the country of France. To do this he reorganized the army and was exceptionally…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although he developed the strongest standing army in Europe, France antagonized all other strong forces in Europe during more than fifty years of his ruling, and eventually bankrupted the French Government. “It produced poverty, misery, and depopulation….Recurring famines and tax increases provoked peasant uprisings” (Palmer 189). From the War of Devolution until the Treaty of Utrecht, Louis gained a slight portion of land in Europe, but he drained the wealth of France and aggravated the burden on French peasants. Endless wars eliminated the chances of creating a prosperous economy system in France and weakened his absolutism with huge debt.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first, Louis' wars were quite beneficial. He was able to take over a few cities and began expanding his kingdom to what he considered its natural boundaries. More importantly, he was able to accomplish this without adding taxes to the people. But by 1684, the expansion ceased and the troubles began. He yielded territory to England, Spain, and Sweden. The wars of the next two decades did not provide any additional territories to France and strained the French resources. The…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The king was not a good monarch in the eyes of the common people. He was not looking over France and making sure it runs well. He was too isolated to notice the bad state of the country. The poverty of France was on such a bad level that the common people…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nationalist perspective of King Louis XIV is that the head of the country is the nation and for society to prosper the people have to be willing to serve and follow the leader’s will. The source’s perspective can be shown throughout history by the beliefs and values he had during his reign in France. The source believed in the uses of a social hierarchy and the absolute monarch. The social hierarchy benefited the people who were part of the Roman Catholic Clergy or nobility. These people received privileges and were not required to pay taxes. The rest of the population had a difficult and challenging way of living. They were required to serve the king by paying taxes which lead to poor living conditions, in which some died from starvation. The absolute monarch allowed all the power in France to be consolidated in the hands of the king. This allowed for King Louis XIV to be the main voice in France and gave the power to decide how the country will operate. These ideals were the main contributions to start of the French Revolution, many people felt that they deserved better rights which lead the nation members to revolt and seek a better constitution. The source would disagree with J.D Vance’s idea to bridge the gap between the rich and poor. King Louis XIV would believe that he should not have to…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His people, his town, his family and his treasury were all lost in an attempt to break away from a strong central government. King Louis was simply too strong and would stoop at nothing to bring the breakaway Northern province back into his…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 10, 1774, Louis’ grandfather, Louis XV, died crowning Louis XVI as the new king. Louis was twenty years old at that time, and had proven to be immature and irresponsible. He also lacked in self-confidence and was crowned into a time where he faced huge debt. On top of that, France’s military was inefficient and the economy was in turmoil, a state of great disturbance, confusion, or uncertainty. One way Louis helped the people was by sending troupes into the Americas where the independence war was underway and helping the independents with their naval victory. But, in France there was a huge crisis with the price of flour and bread. The prices of both kept increasing and many people were outraged. Later, the…

    • 1282 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In April 1814, napoleon abdicated from the throne unconditionally due to the other European monarchs opposing and rising against him. This meant that there was a rising question to who would take over the French phone and rule. The decision of this was to the quadruple alliance (Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia), they then made the decisions to restore the Bourbon reign, that last ruled in 1793. The rightful heir to the Bourbon reign was Louis XVIII. When Louis became king in 1814, and started ruling he was faced with many tasks that he had to complete. The tasks that Louis XVIII was faced with included improving the French morque, rehabilitate the bourbon name and to secure their hold on the throne, rule through the charter, prevent the ultra royalists getting out of hand, not to alienate (offend) the liberals, solve the problem of Frances debts, rehabilitate Frances reputations in foreign affairs and to deal with the Napoleonic threat. In order for Louis XVIII to have become a successful he would have to deal with the tasks facing him. If he managed to complete many of these tasks he being a king of France would have been successful. To decide if Louis XVIII was successful a monarch, a successful ruler must be defined. A successful monarch would be someone who would put the interests of their country first, maybe not pleasing everybody all the time, but assuring the countries steadiness in the best way possible. As I mentioned before about when Louis XVIII did come to the throne that he faced a series of problems that he need to solve. Some of the problems where more difficult than some of the other problems, however he handled these problems with ease, and this shows a successful king solving the problems facing his country. On the other hand to what extent was Louis XVIII successful as a king? I am going to talk about the problems that Louis faced and if and how he handed the problems, and also if…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    louis phillipe`s cautious foreign policy led to his downfall.amongst the several groups of french citizens,there was the bonapartist party which favoured millitary glory thus when louis phillipe failed top bring millitary glory to france,whereby he remained passive on the mehelmet ali crisis.louis did not assist mehelmet ali when other great powers threatened to intervene when he had gained victory against the sultan.worse still the other great powers did not invite france to the conference an dthis made the people of france furious.also his passiveness on the belgium revolts whereby he refused to let his son rule belgium and this would mean increase ininfluence to belgium,this made the people of france who so yearned for millitary glory and prestige to withdrew their support from louis phillipe when the 1848 revolutions occured.even larmantine stated that france was bored and this led to his downfall.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays