Preview

Describe and Evaluate Milgram

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
356 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Describe and Evaluate Milgram
Describe and evaluate Milgram’s study into obedience

Milgram (1963)’s aim was to see the levels of obedience to authority, he recruited 40 male participants by advertising for volunteers on newspaper to take part of a study of memory at Yale University. Each individual was paid $4.50 and was told that they would receive this money even if they quit during the study. The participants were always the teachers and confederates were the learners. The participants were told that if the learner got a question wrong they would have to give electric shocks increasing at 15volts each time. Milgram had asked psychologists how far they thought participants would go, and there had been an assumption that only 2.6% would go to 240volts, however despite their assumption Milgram found that 95% of the participants went up to 300volts, and 65% of the participants gave the maximum 450v shock. The findings show that ordinary people are astonishingly obedient to authority, even when they are asked to carry out shocking tasks, this suggests that it is not evil people who commit atrocities but ordinary people who are just obeying orders, therefore this can explain why German soldiers were so harsh and inhumane during the Holocaust. Milgram’s study has been supported by many other studies. Hofling et al (1966) conducted a study in a hospital; Dr Smith gave instructions on the telephone to the Nurses and gave orders to overdose a patient with a drug called Astroten. 21 out of 22 nurses obeyed, therefore this study supported that obedience does occur in real life settings. However Milgram’s study has been criticised for deception and the lack of informed consent, Milgram did not tell his participants the real purpose of the study and because he deceived his participants, the participant’s informed consent was not for the original study. Also Milgram did not give his participants the right to withdraw, because even though Milgram argued that the participants were allowed to leave

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Obedience and Authority Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram wrote an article, "The Perils of Obedience," which documented his unique experiment about obedience and authority. The purpose was to observe to what extent an ordinary citizen would compromise his or her conscience when ordered to inflict increasing pain to another human. The experiment consisted of three people: a teacher and learner chosen at random, and a scientist. Once all three were acquainted, the scientist explained that the goal of the experiment was to research the effects of discipline. Thereafter, the learner was strapped to a chair with an electrode attached to their wrist.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milgram Obediance Study

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In May of 1962 Stanley Milgram, a Social Psychologist at Yale University, conducted a study on “Obedience and Human Nature” that was influenced by his curiosity of the WWII German Nazi Holocaust and concentration camps. Milgram asked “How could it be, that ordinary German people could allow the extermination of the Jews” and wanted to know under what circumstances would a person disobey authority?…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main aim was to examine obedience in a real-life setting, A total of 22 nurses took part in the experiment. Each of the nurses was telephoned by a doctor (given a name that was not known to the nurse, e.g. Dr Hanford in one case) and told to give a patient 20 milligrams (mg) of the drug “Astroten”. The nurses were not aware that the pink pills inside the Astroten box were simply glucose tablets! On the box of Astroten it clearly stated that the usual does was 5 mg and the maximum daily dose was 10 mg. So the nurses were being asked to give twice the maximum dosage. The telephone conversation with the doctor was recorded. Also, the behaviour of the nurse was observed after the telephone call had been completed. Within 48 hours of the study, each of the nurses was interviewed and reassured that no harm had been done. They were also told that they would remain anonymous and absolutely no action would be taken against them. Of the 22 nurses in the study, 21 simply completed the telephone call and gave the patient 20 mg of Astroten. The average length of telephone call was around 2 minutes. This indicates that the nurses offered no resistance and simply followed the orders of an authority figure. Hofling had shown that people are obedient in real-life and in life-threatening…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to the experiments, Milgram sought predictions about the outcome from psychiatrists, college sophomores, middle-class adults, graduate students and faculty in behavioral sciences. All thought the teachers would refuse to obey the experimenter. The majority of the teachers would show concern once the learners began showing signs of discomfort. However, 60 percent of them followed the orders until the end, administering shocks to the learner up to 450 volts. (para. 27) The findings were dismissed as having no relevance to “ordinary” people considering the subjects used were students of Yale. Colleagues of Milgram claimed that these students were highly aggressive and competitive when provoked. (para. 27)…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discuss the ethics of Milgram's obedience study. In the years 1961-1962, Stanley Milgram - Yale University psychologist, conducted the first of the obedience experiments, which were also called "shock" studies. The research was invented to check if the people would be ready to harm somebody just to meet the requirements of the experiment. This essay will be focused on the ethical side of the study.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram solicits 40 males from various ages and professions. These subjects are explained that they are part of an experiment that studies the influence of punishment on learning. However, the true purpose is to check their willingness to obey to an authority figure by inflicting pain that they think is real when it is not to a victim. The experimenter, Milgram’s accomplice, acts as a figure of authority, giving orders to the subjects. The victim, also a collaborator, experiences the pain given by the subject. The pain is given by a shock generator, which is comprised with 30 switches, with a voltage that ranges from 15 to 450 volts. Subjects enter the laboratory one by one. All go through the experiment: 14 of them do not complete the full experiment, while 26 do. The majority of the subjects obey to authority, aware that they are physically hurting the victim. Also there is an unexpected amount of stressful reactions.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is hard to consider people who neglect to act in the face of extreme cruelty, especially those who witnessed the events of the Holocaust without intervening, as average humans. However, recent sociological experiments have revealed that most people will witness an emergency without intervening due to altruistic inertia or pluralistic ignorance. In the case of genocide, dehumanization is crucial to the ability of ordinary people to commit or observe unspeakable acts of violence against another. Genocides such as the Holocaust occur due to the nature of most people to be bystanders and the ability of the perpetrators to depict their victims as subhuman.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article, Behavioral Study of Obedience written by Dr. Stanley Milgram of Yale University was published in 1963 by the American Psychological Association (Milgram, 1963). In this article we explore one of the most widely studied articles of obedience in psychology. Dr. Milgram conducted an experiment that focused on the connection between the conscience and obedience to authority or commands. The first of many experiments took place in July 1961 after the trial of Adolf Eichmann. Eichmann was accused of war crimes such as enforcement of Hitler’s anti-Semitic policies and genocide. Milgram sought to find out if Germans were more obedient to the authority figures. His experiment was designed to answer the following question: Was Eichmann and his million accomplices simply following orders? To answer this and many other questions, Milgram selected participants for this experiment by advertising for male participants to participate in a study of learning at Yale University.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After watching the Milgram experiment and the abuse that occur in Abu Ghraib prison. It is clear that leadership roles and authority position can both influence people to do thing that are harmful and bad to others. Leadership focuses on gaining people to follow them and is more based on free will. While authority has the power to tell people what to do. In the Milgram experiment many people back up why they continue administering shocks by stating, “Because an authority figure was telling them what to do and he was the expert” (Short, 2013). In the video a researcher of the Milgram experiment explained that people do what authority figures tells them to do because we are trained to follow authority figures and in the Milgram experiment the…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assessing Obedience

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Obedience is a characteristic ingrained in every person. No matter who a person is, there is always a more authoritative figure that they must obey to. Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted experiments that tested obedience towards authority. These experiments were conducted in 1963 at Yale University. The experiments Milgram performed gained many different reactions from people. Two authors that wrote their thoughts on the experiments done by Milgram are Diana Baumrind and Richard Herrnstein. Diana Baumrind, who wrote the “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, believes that the experiments Milgram conducted were not necessary and should not have been conducted unless the subject knew the harms that could occur after the experiment was done. Baumrind is a psychologist, who was employed at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, Berkley at the time that Milgram’s experiment was performed. Richard Herrnstein has a different belief. Herrnstein, the author of the article “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, believes Milgram’s experiments were well done and show great potential of what we are able to do in the future. Milgram’s experiment is valid because it was conducted in an appropriate setting, there was minimal psychological harm done, and it contained valuable results.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine a hospital reception desk. A nurse receives a phone call from a doctor he or she does not recognize. This doctor instructs the nurse “to administer a non-prescribed drug in double the maximum dosage to a patient” (Jacobson, 1978, par.1). Many people believe only a few nurses would commit this act but out of the 22 nurses called, 21 of them, followed the doctor's orders (Jacobson, 1978). This experiment in obedience is an old one. This example was simply a test to see if Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiment could be applied outside of the research arena. Many will say that much has changed now, and in some ways they have, considering the legal implications of medicine, yet sadly, this behavior still occurs today in many other areas of life.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Milgram Experiment

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people believe human beings should not be used as test subjects in experiments. The use of human beings for experiments or research can have lasting negative effects on that individual such as emotional and psychological damage. The Milgram experiment even though it was a hoax had a lasting effects on many of it’s participants in both positive and negative ways and is a example of why humans should not be used as test subjects.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Milgram Experiment

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Investigate: Whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures as this was a common explanation for the Nazi killings in World War II.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obedience

    • 1282 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Obedience to Authority Experiment of Stanley Milgram is one of the most studied experiments in American history due to its wide-ranging social implications. The study gained popular attention because it aimed to provide some insight as to why the Holocaust had escalated in such a way. The study was designed around testing the degree of inflicted pain strangers would give to others, under orders by an experimenter. Not only did the study defy what others predict would happen, but it clearly unmasked the immorality of human judgment under the obedience of a fellow partner. In Milgram’s follow-up paper titled, “The Perils of Obedience”, he outlined the results, which point to the fact that relatively few people have the mental resources needed to resist authority. This paper will outline the setup of the experiment and follow up with the results and finally the social implications of such a study.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The study of Obedience

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist, conducted the Behavioral study of obedience experiment. Milgram conducted this experiment to measure the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure instructing them to perform acts that conflicted with their moral view of right and wrong. The participants in the Milgram experiment were 40 men recruited using newspaper ads. The researchers hoped that the level of shock that the participants were willing to deliver would be used as the measure of obedience. Milgram developed an intimidating shock generator, with shock levels starting at 30 volts and increasing in 15-volt increments all the way up to 450 volts. The many switches were labeled with terms including "slight shock," "moderate shock" and "danger: severe shock." The final two switches were labeled simply with an "XXX. Of the 40 participants in the study, 26 delivered the maximum shocks while 14 stopped before reaching the highest levels. It is important to note that many of the subjects became extremely agitated, distraught and angry at the experimenter. Yet they continued to follow orders all the way to the end.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays