Preview

Democracy: The Roman Republic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
561 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democracy: The Roman Republic
The Roman Republic, which was established in 510 BC after the defeat Etruscan conquerors, was in some ways an oligarchy. It was not a democracy as it is understood today. The Roman republic was ruled by a small group; consuls, and the Senate. To avoid trouble, none of these had absolute power. The Senate was a part of Roman aristocrats known as patricians or the wealthy upper class. They could oversee public funds and advise the Roman kings. They were from wealthy family and stayed in the position for life. The consuls were usually two magistrates elected by the patricians. They had the say on when to go to war or when to implement new laws. Both the consuls and the Senate worked hand in hand, although steadily over the years, the Senate gained more power. The Senate was the major body in the Republic. They swayed the decisions of the two consuls. …show more content…
They never enjoyed a political autonomy; they never had any say in the government. However, over the years, the patricians began granting the plebeians some privileges, civil liberties as well as concessions to keep them under control (Hingley

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The structure of the Republic and its underlying flaws, shown through individual actions, was integral to the weakening of the Roman Republic. This government consisted of two factions; the Optimate and the Populares. The Optimates were traditionalist politicians, who supported the republic and wished to minimize the power of the popular assemblies and the Tribunes of the plebs. The Populares represented the people and relied on the legislative assemblies and the Tribunate to gain power. The senate tended to side with the Optimates as there key interests coincided. They were perturbed with the idea of individuals rising through the assemblies, backed by their armies and the Tribunate. When Pompey wished to secure land for his war veterans in 62 BC, the senate blocked him, as they did not want him gaining power and challenging them. This relates to the relative power of the Senate and the assemblies. The senate could pass decrees in the form of advice. However if this conflicted with a law passed through the assembly, it would override the senates decree. The Senate had tried to undermine this power; yet, was restored under the consulships of Caesar in 59 and Crassus and Pompey in 55. As the republic declined, individuals used the tribunes and the assemblies for their personal gain. This is how Pompey and Crassus passed laws,…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The beginning for the direction of government and administration started with Julius Caesar wanting a centralized, imperial form of government. His plans did not span out with upset elite classes that led to his assassination. The elite men wanted to create a government that was not in their power, which led to conflict and chaos. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, ended the struggle and was the leader to start the imperial rule that was right for Rome. The government was disguised as a republic. Just as Caesar, Augustus ruled by centralizing political and military power. He preserved traditional republican offices and forms of government. Members of the Roman elite were also members of the government. Augustus accumulated vast power and took full responsibility for the important governmental functions. As a form of a bureaucracy, he was very careful to place individuals loyal to him…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prompt: Compare and contrast Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian influence on democracy considering the role of the individual, government, and their contributions in a well written essay of 3-4 pages…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy has been around for hundreds of years and while the basic principles have stayed the same though each society governed in a slightly different way. The most influential democracies were Greece, as it was considered one of the first democracies, and the Roman Republic which lasted several hundred years. Because each sovereignty ruled differently, they had different advancements in the areas of democracy especially in the people's role in the government, the method of voting and fairness of law.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman government also consisted of the three branches we are familiar with, the executive, legislative, and judicial. "From the Founding of Rome in 753 to 509 B.C. Rome was a monarchy, ruled by kings. In 509 B.C., the Romans expelled the Etruscans and established the Republic. Having witnessed the problems of monarchy on their own land, and aristocracy…

    • 1451 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The traditional dates for the Roman Republic are 509 to 27 B.C. The latter part of this period from 133 to 27 B.C. is known as the late Republic. It is also known as the Roman Revolution. The result of this revolution was the emergence of the Roman Empire and the catalyst has traditionally been linked to a single Roman citizen called Tiberius Gracchus. The wake of his brief political career left Rome much different than it had been. Like a crack in the wall of a dam, Tiberius revealed a weakness in the Roman system of government that would soon spider out of control until it could no longer hold back the deluge of the building political tension. What was this weakness?…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Republic was rather democratic.The Romans were the start of a democracy, and we include many of their ideas today in the United States. They were democratic because they had a constitution two important elements including legislation, and the right for citizens to vote. The Romans still use the same concept as the government does nowadays, such as the magistrates, senate, and assemblies. The assemblies job was to pass legislation, which is the most important reason that Romans were democratic.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    tried to build a more solid senate but failed to take power away from the…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Change over Time

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Patricians continued to dominate Rome, although the plebeians did receive some governmental rights. They had tribunes, which had the power to intervene in political matters and veto measures they considered were unfair. The plebeians gained the right to hold almost all state offices and became eligible to have one of the consuls represent them during fourth century, B.C.E. These compromises eased tensions between classes, but did not solve all political crises. The Romans would appoint a dictator when faced with military of civil issues.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Rome, patricians were known to be the ruling class of the society, while plebians were the peasants or commoners without opportunities to move upward on the social ladder. The lack of social mobility in Ancient Rome poses a comparison against modern time United States. One of the very core foundations of the U.S. is that citizens are encouraged to pursue the American dream. People still hold true the promise of the better life by achieving education attainment…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Empires

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Between 200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E. The Roman Empire ruled with an iron fist controlling mostly and if not all of the Mediterranean. This was due to two main factors, these are it military power and the political system it was able to develop. However most of the Romans accomplishment didn’t happen as an empire, but a republic. While as a republic, Romans created a political system that heavily influenced many to move to the Rome. In the article Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer he states that the political system created “a written code of law offered plebeians (the poor class) some protection from abuse” from the upper or elite classes. Also this provided a better “system of public assemblies [that] provided an opportunity for lower classes to shape public policy and a new office of tribune” that would represent them in these assemblies. This was a huge part of Rome popularity and its growing number. This was the first time were the poorer classes had any kind of support from a political system. The Romans had get deal of pride with their newly developed system that benefited everyone. They also believed that the political system gave them a “greater freedom than did many of their more autocratic neighbors.”…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece is normally associated with the origin of democracy. Basically, Greek government evolved from single rule to small group rule to rule by the people. Because each city-state in ancient Greece possessed its own government, some of these types existed other than democracy, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy. This essay will compare and contrast the ancient governments, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy in Ancient Greek city states.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays