Preview

Deja Vu

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1969 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deja Vu
Crystal Riddell
Susan Datz
PHI 101
June 21, 2008
Socrates and Déjà Vu
Slide 3- Lived Prior Lives: What happens to the soul when we die? Does the soul come back into the form of another body? How is someone born already knowing certain things? Let’s take a look at some of these questions by first looking at a man named Socrates.
Point 1- Law of opposites: Socrates believed that human beings have lived prior lives so to try to explain and validate the point on living prior lives he used the law of opposites. The Law of Opposites shows how everything in the universe must have an opposite. “And the weaker comes from the stronger and the faster from the slower”. (134)
Point 2 -“that the living come into being again from the dead” (133)
Using the law of opposites Socrates is able to explain that the opposite of death is life so one must reenter the world from the land of the dead.
Point 3- What is remembered from previous lives?
Socrates advised that if ones soul had not deceased from the previous life wouldn’t some information be retained to the next life?
Point 4- Knowledge: Socrates advised that all knowledge that has ever been known and will ever be known is already preexistent in your memory; thus time is an illusion, merely the unfolding process of remembering everything.

Slide 4- Recollecting Prior knowledge: Is the learning process simply re-gathering previous information?
Point 1- Theory of Recollection: Well, Socrates uses the Theory of Recollection to further show that before one is born the knowledge is already there. One is never taught anything new, but instead reminded of things already known. Socrates deduces this from the argument that “our souls exist in the other world” (135)
Point 2- Theory of Forms: The Theory of Forms helps us to try and understand what Socrates is trying to convey about living previous lives by using the evidence of without ever looking at a perfect circle or even a straight line one already knows what there are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Phaedo, socrates tells us his theories of the soul before and after death. He shows us that the body and soul are separate and the soul stays after death and lives before being born.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno's Geometric Argument

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the Meno, Socrates tries to walk Meno through the discovery of if virtue can be taught. Along the way they come across the theory that if virtue can be taught then it is knowledge. If knowledge then it can be taught but the Geometric argument was brought up where a person can have the capacity to learn based on their previous life and their soul conjuring up prior knowledge to understand the topic. Socrates called upon a slave, a person who has no formal education and walked him through a geometry problem. This problem was meant to illustrate that a person’s knowledge is not based on what this person has learned in their lifetime but their capacity and ability to understand is based on what their soul has learned in previous lifetimes. Socrates uses this example show his thesis is true but what about different scenarios that aren’t math based and through different problems you can see that Socrates theory is half correct and that there are several implications that prove that souls don’t know it all.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I have thought quite a bit about whether or not I agree with Socrates. Part of me wants to agree with him and believe that there is a chance to come back after death. I am just unsure because even though I am not extremely religious I have always been taught that when you die you go to heaven or hell and that is where you stay for all eternity. I think that anything is possible and I honestly would not mind finding out there is an afterlife and something to come back to because in my mind it would give an actual purpose to life. Finally, if I was able to talk to Socrates and ask him a question about the afterlife I think I would ask him, “If there is an afterlife and we come back after a certain period of time, what is next? Do we live another life or do we try to make right what went wrong in our previous life?” These questions have perplexed me…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates had a very vivid imagination as to his views on death and the afterlife. He envisioned guided paths that one must follow to a point of entry to the rivers. He described these rivers with the ebb and flow of life. The final spot is Tartarus, the deepest point in the Earth. His theory was that each person travelled one of these rivers until they were ready to return to Earth in another form. The philosophical will dwell in the purer Earth in mansions. The incurable will are destined to Tartarus and never to come out. Those that are neither well nor ill will suffer a penalty and then be absolved. There are some that have committed crimes that are not unpardonable and…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The route to Larissa, therefore, would be an example of opinion but not of knowledge, and could never be recollected. Despite all the examples, the hypothesis itself is not sufficiently approved to demonstrate the immortality of the soul. Different explanations in both books turn out to be by one means or another “deceptive “ .If all humans possess knowledge through recollection, this would disprove Socrates' frequent statement that he does not have any knowledge. There were also lacks of explanation: if we are to believe his idea of theory of recollection on knowledge, then how did the soul initially gain knowledge?…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The example of the slave boy in Plato 's meno helps to support Plato 's argument that we do not just have knowledge, and that we know things only by recollection. The theory of recollection investigates if we have already learned knowledge by previous experiences. There are several questions to raise with this theory such as where knowledge comes from in the first place and what exactly it is that we are remembering. The theory tries to help solve the main problem of the paradox of enquiry. It also looks at the difference between knowledge and self belief- and we can observe that Plato is perhaps suggesting a posterion knowledge, which is based on observation.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. What are the two arguments Socrates gives to his friends for why one should not fear death? Are they convincing?…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno replies in agreement with Socrates that indeed the opinions expressed by the boy were entirely his own. Socrates then gives a third definition to affirm his proposition, by stating that the man whom himself believes that he does not know, surely knows, but has not yet had his true opinions stirred up. Meno agrees with the premise that therein the immortal soul of man exists true opinions, relevant both to the awakened and un-awakened knowledge. Socrates restates that one will find knowledge within oneself through recollection. To learn and to discover is a fallacy, for not learning but questioning brings about the recollection of the truth and knowledge known by one’s…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now having gone through all of that, Meno asks Socrates, how will know you found virtue if you do not know what it truly is? Socrates then goes on to tell Meno about the immortal soul and recollection. This is a belief that your soul is all knowing because it has been through an infinite amount of lives, consuming all kinds of knowledge and information. According to this, the soul is said to be all knowing. According to this theory, learning is just a…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates does not solve Meno’s paradox by presenting the recollection theory fully. This paper will explore Plato’s Meno through Meno’s paradox, Socrates’ refutation of the paradox, the recollection theory, and the evidence Socrates uses to present his theory. Socrates never explores how one can learn something that is not previously known.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If learning was simply recollection, there would be no experimenting or teaching, everyone would know all they need to know without going to school and there would be no exciting advancements because we would just be at the highest level. What about the slave boy example? Well, that is disproved by the simple fact that Socrates is asking leading questions such as, “Do you know that a figure like this is a square? ”. The slave boy is not arriving at his own conclusions and is simply picking up on what Socrates is leading him to. Furthermore, this idea does not explain how we first come to know things, where is this innate knowledge coming from? All-in-all both of these ideas are deconstructed in today’s empirical world of science and experimentation, we go on journeys to discover what we do not know and ask questions along the way to help.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates responds that getting to know isn't always a count number of coming across some thing new but alternatively of recollecting something the soul knew earlier than delivery however has since forgotten. to show what he approach, he calls over one in all Meno’s slave boys, attracts a square with aspects of two feet, and asks the boy to calculate how lengthy the aspect of a rectangular would be if it had twice…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays