Preview

Death Penalty

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2110 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty
The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic that is developing within our society today. According to Andre and Velasquez in “Capital Punishment: Our Duty or Our Doom,” 2000 people in the United States are currently awaiting capital punishment due to atrocious crimes (Andre and Velasquez 2013). This issue is becoming more controversial as more states are beginning to consider ratifying this concept states Andre and Velasquez (Andre and Velasquez 2013). The reason this issue is becoming more controversial is due to the fact that this punishment is at the peak of severity. Capital punishment is the legal process for a court to deem death upon an individual due to the severity of the crimes committed. These crimes can range anywhere from murder, to treason under certain circumstances. Sociologically, numerous activist groups due to the fact of the extreme controversy of the task at hand are questioning this issue. Does living in a free country necessarily give the courts the right to take a person’s life just due to the crimes, or is another punishment necessarily acceptable in certain circumstances? Does a judge, or any person for that matter, have the rights to sentence a person to death? Andre and Velasquez state that morally, the death penalty is wrong on the basis that society has a moral obligation to save as many lives as possible, not take them (Andre and Velasquez 2013). Andre and Velasquez further state that there is no supporting evidence to say that another punishment has a stronger effect then let’s say death (Andre and Velasquez 2013). The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic due to the severity of the punishment; however, certain measure must be understood to fully implicate the reasons for the establishment of this punishment within our society today. The death penalty can be considered a benefit towards criminals for many reasons. A person who has nothing to lose can think to himself or herself that they can


References: Andre, Claire, and Manuel Velasquez. "Capital Punishment:Our Duty or Our Doom." Santa Clara University. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 June 2013. . "Case Study Kennedy Vs. Lousiana."Death Penalty Information Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 June 2013. . Walter Berns, For Capital Punishment (New York: Basic Books, 1979.) Locke, Mandy. "Death Mate Inmate to go Free; Levon 'Bo ' Jones won 't be retried in the 1987 slaying of a Duplin bootlegger."North Carolina Coaliton for a Mortuarium. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 June 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    death penalty

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Specific deterrence- punishment of a crime that prevents the offender from repeating the same offense again.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In his paper, “The Minimal Invasion Argument Against the Death Penalty”, Hugo Adam Bedau argues against the death penalty. Bedau’s purpose is to convince people to favor the lifetime imprisonment over the death penalty with an argument that had been previously used by other authors called “The minimal Invasion Argument”, which he considers to be “the best argument against the death penalty”(Bedau, 4). In this paper I will describe Bedau’s argument and show how he has some weaknesses addressing the concept of the minimal invasion argument by ignoring what in my opinion is the main reason why the death penalty has not been abolished; this reason being our incapacity as humans to “define” our environment. When we call one thing by a name we believe this thing is the name by which we have called it. For example when we call somebody a criminal we take away many of the characteristics that make us equal to the criminal and then just call him or her a criminal. With this essay I want to prove that in some cases as human beings we need to believe in re-definition, in change; all this in order to build a better society. To do this I will first explain Bedau’s argument as best as possible and then conclude with the issues I found on it that are based on our language as the interpreter of our world.…

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Title: Point: Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished. By: Ballaro, Beverly, Cushman, C. Ames, Points of View: Death Penalty, 2009 Database: Points of View Reference Center…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Beiser, V. (1998). “Lucky To Be Alive: Freed former death row inmates warn that the…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Death Row on Trial, [video recording], 2001, David C. Taylor, Brisbane, (distributed by ABC Broadcast), 43 min.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. What amendment to the U.S. Constitution gave women the right to vote, and in what year?…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death penalty is one the debatable topics throughout the world. There is a conflict between law and ethics. Public opinion does not coincide with the state opinion. There are 33 countries, which use death penalty as capital punishment. According to Amnesty International Report, in 2011, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and USA topped the list. According to statistics, in USA 33 states use death penalty as capital punishment and other 17 does not. (Amnesty International, 2011) Death penalty’s primary goal is to make people think twice before doing crime. The Death penalty helps to decrease the murder’s rate, however it could violate human right.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4827 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. They argue that retribution or "an eye for an eye" honors the victim, helps console grieving families, and ensures that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause future tragedy.…

    • 4827 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Should the Death Penalty be Banned as a Form of Punishment.” Balance Politics. N.p., 12…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1966 Support of capital punishment reaches an all-time low A Gallup poll shows support of the death penalty at only 42%…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty has been most talked about for years, to some it is an unfair way to pass judgment on a person. The argument went as far as to say that conforming to such a method is a step backwards and offers no real solution. Critic Coretta Scott King argued strongly against the practice and rebukes the idea. One can always say what they want about the matter but insufficient knowledge with hinder their judgment. The death penalty ought to be considered as a means of punishment for those who commit ghastly murders.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death penalty

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By using death as punishment the government also impinges upon its own human rights: Article 3 of the human rights, established by the United Nations and signed by the USA says: Every human being has the right of live, of freedom, and of personal safety.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 3552 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The question regarding whether the United States should implement the death penalty as a form of punishment is a heated issue in American politics. The topic is so divisive because it deals with death, which is permanent. Life is valued in every society, and when life is taken away, emotions rise. Most human beings maintain a strong underlying fear of dying, so they wish to prevent their own death, especially their murder, at any cost. Furthermore, since crime is a prevalent problem in the U.S., Americans yearn for a successful way to reduce the homicide rate. However, most Americans do not favor the use of the death penalty when other options, such as life in prison without parole plus restitution, are presented (Dieter). By comparing the empirical and moral claims of the arguments in favor and against the use of the death penalty, we suggest that the presidential candidate take a cautiously anti-death penalty stance.…

    • 3552 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flawed Death Penalty

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Death Penalty has no place in the modern United States Criminal Justice System. The moral correctness of the government sentencing prisoners to death is a long debated argument. Death penalty supporters may believe that death is a rightful punishment to those who are found guilty of murder, or that the punishment will deter future criminals from committing homicide. Capital punishment is a serious problem facing many innocent Americans, as well as slowing the progression of our nation. Many states have voted to ban the execution of convicted felons. To advance our civilization, the death penalty must be entirely eliminated from our society and way of life, because it is both primitive as well as socially retarding.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People that are for the death penalty have many reasons for that such as: The death penalty gives closure to the victim's families who have suffered so much. It creates another form of crime deterrent. Justice is better served. Our justice system shows more sympathy for criminals than it does victims. It provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. DNA testing and other methods of modern crime scene science can now effectively eliminate almost all uncertainty as to a person's guilt or innocence. Prisoner parole or escapes can give criminals another chance to kill. It contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system. It gives prosecutors another bargaining chip in the plea bargain process, which is essential in cutting costs in an overcrowded court system.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays