Preview

DNA Profiling Argument Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
518 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
DNA Profiling Argument Essay
Many people believe that DNA profiling is not a credible source. Although 99.9 percent of human DNA is the same in everyone, the remaining 0.1 percent which consists of about 3 million base pairs of amino acids is unique to that individual (Ballaro and Walter). Without the help of scientists and their technology many criminals would get away with their crimes. Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is a component of every cell in the human body. DNA can be found in any organic source for example saliva, blood, semen, and even hair or skin cells. The use of DNA to settle a crime case, started in 1988 with the conviction of Colin Pitchfork for the rape and murder of two young girls in England (Driscoll and Newton). Although some people that have been innocent charged with crimes the most reliable source is still DNA profiling. The FBI’s DNA profiling program has a goal to standardize methodology among all US laboratories. Forensic sampling is getting new advanced technology to enhance the accuracy of DNA testing (Driscoll and Newton). There is concern that DNA profiling poses a threat to individual privacy rights (Ballaro and Walter). DNA profiling is not harming anyone’s rights it’s protecting the community by putting the correct criminals away. DNA evidence is huge when it comes to jury trials. It gives, what most …show more content…
The Yorkshire Police department reopened the case in 1999 and matched the DNA profile to Ronald Castree. He Was later convicted and sent to jail for 30 years in 2007 ( Sean Hodgson ). If the process of DNA profiling was not used in this case then Stefan Kiszko would not have been able to prove his innocence and Ronald Castree would have gotten away and committed even more crimes. DNA profiling allows for the victims family to know that the right person is put

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issue: When state officials collect and analyze a DNA sample taken from a person who has been arrested for,…

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction:Dna evidence has been known for many years in crime scenes.Dna evidence was first discovered in 1986.Dna evidence can find anyone by finding blood,skin cells,hair,saliva,and semen.Dna evidence can be good at finding people 95% at a time,because of the cells in the dna.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    CreateFingerprint

    • 678 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since 1984 forensic scientists have been using DNA profiling to identify the potential perpetrators of crimes and to locate missing persons. In this Web-based activity, you will:…

    • 678 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the inception of this technology it has been to be extremely effective in helping law enforcement solve crimes, exonerating individuals accused of crimes, identifying persons that have been disfigured or dismembered, resolve paternity issues and locating lost or unknown family members. Conversely, the technology does have to be revamped and changed in order to address the issues and challenges it faces. Privacy concerns of both criminals and individuals that volunteer their DNA for testing is at the forefront of the discussion.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Brandon L. Garrett's book, Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong, he makes it very clear how wrongful convictions occur and how these people have spent many years in prison for crimes they never committed. Garrett presents 250 cases of innocent people who were convicted wrongfully because the prosecutors opposed testing the DNA of those convicted. Garrett provided simple statistics such as graphs, percentages, and charts to help the reader understand just how great of an impact this was.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The universal DNA database is important to the law enforcement agencies. The database will help the law enforcement agencies to identify suspects fast. When the universal data base is not used, it is very easy for a criminal to commit a crime and escape. The DNA universal database will improve the crime investigation thereby curbing the menace of criminals. When this takes effect, criminals might be extremely careful not to leave any trace that can help in getting their DNA for identification (Krimsky & Simoncelli, 2011). Nevertheless, the fear of being identified will result into a reduction in crime with many would be criminals staying away from crime. The implementation of the database will be a strong deterrent to first time offenders.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dna Profiling Saves Lives

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    DNA is an all-around subject that has many different aspects. DNA Profiling, however, is one of our greatest discoveries. This discovery led us to know how to analyze, identify, and match DNA according to certain genes on the DNA. This Profiling has freed many convicted felons, because their DNA didn’t match the person who did commit the crime. DNA Profiling is beneficial to everyone (except felons), it has a small area in its process that people can make mistakes, and is used in many different ways. However, freeing the innocent that were convicted is a big area.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Bain and Jonathan Barr were convicted for crime they have never committed. Like many others, false allegations cause innocent individuals to be arrested for crimes they have not committed. Results from DNA testing have been used as great evidence to help people reach their freedom from being behind bars. To prevent the conviction of innocent individuals, DNA tests should be mandatory to take when proving one’s evidence.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    DNA evidence is a widely used tool in the NSW criminal justice system that aims to help achieve justice. DNA, short for deoxyribonucleic acid, is a long molecule found within the cells of the human body. Each cell contains genetic material in which, apart from identical twins, is exclusive to every individual. DNA though considered a reliable piece of evidence can present many issues in the criminal justice system such as its influence on juries, the issue of maintaining the balance of an individual’s rights with the state’s responsibilities and the issues of DNA contamination, storage and interpretation. These issues will be discussed later.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although the justice system can be very biased due to the color of one’s skin, the modern advancements in technologies able to be used in crimes can rightfully be used to detect the rightful culprit. One major example of this is the ascertaining of DNA, recently found in the 1950s. This type of evidence is irrefutable because it is superfluously unique to an individual (excluding the case of a twin). It can be found through a myriad of ways, including skin, saliva, semen, blood, or hair. When this ground-shaking concept came out, it was almost like the rebirth of the discovery of fingerprints, for it was so marvelous. The reliable source, Pro Con, quotes, “A remarkable feature of DNA testing is that it not only helps to convict but also serves…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dna Collection Case

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 2015 Congress passed the DNA Fingerprint Act, which required that, beginning January 1, 2009, any adult arrested for a federal crime provide a DNA sample. As of May 2013, 29 states, in addition to the federal government, have enacted arrestee DNA collection laws, which authorize collection of DNA following arrest or charging. A U.S. Supreme Court decision, Maryland v. King (2013), upheld a Maryland state law that allowed for the warrantless collection of a DNA sample for those arrested for a serious offense. This Supreme Court case was a rejection of infringement of privacy and freedoms as granted by the Fourth Amendment. All fifty states and the federal government require that DNA samples for people convicted of felonies…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is there a better way of solving crimes with DNA evidence to help investigators? The use of DNA technology is the best way to solve investigations. DNA makes it possible to identify people and to know who was at the crime scene based on a little piece of evidence. It helps solve crimes, and even, open cold, unsolved cases. DNA technology in criminal investigations has become an essential tool because of its ability to identify culprits through the use of fingerprints, blood, and genetic samples.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the passing of the Innocence Protection Act in 2004, encouraging DNA testing after conviction, individuals among the legal and science fields have…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the pasts few decades, there has been a great development of the scientific area of DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid, helping on scientific research and most importantly as a tool for solving crimes. Before the usage of DNA, people only had shreds of evidence on the crime which could be detected by the naked eye. However, with the development of DNA detection technology, the police can identify or get some indication about the malefactor by collecting pieces of evidence that were impotent before; for example, hair, fingerprints and even blood (Travis, 1998). However, DNA testing consumes a lot of time and money. But even with this downfall, there is one unvarying fact: DNA testing is highly efficient in solving and preventing crimes.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When an investigation runs out of ways to identify human remains, DNA can play a key role in the identification process. The most common methods of identification by a forensic anthropologist include "detailed skeletal and dental features," of the remains, but they are sometimes asked to perform DNA profiles as well (Arismendi, Baker, & Matteson, 2004). According to the paper by Arismendi, Baker, and Matteson, when the common modes of identification do not yield any results, "DNA typing may provide a further avenue of investigation (Arismendi, Baker, & Matteson, 2004)." Usually when the forensic anthropologist collects the DNA, it's from any tissues that remain on the bones themselves, and as they examine the remains, "it is usually necessary to remove any of the remaining soft tissue," leading some to wonder if the techniques used to do this may compromise the…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays