Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Criminal Commitment

Good Essays
857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Commitment
CRIMINAL COMMITMENT

Criminal Commitment
First, I want to tell you what is criminal commitment. It‘s a legal procedure by which a person who is found not guilt of a crime by reason of insanity must be confined in a psychiatric hospital or facility. In order to become criminal committed a person must stand trial and the trier of the fact (jury) must determine weather the person is not guilty by reason of insanity. After that person is found not guilty by reason of insanity they are acquitted of the offense they are charged with and may not be considered a person charged with a criminal offense .
A number of tests have been used to help the courts make decisions to find if a person is sane to stand trial. One test is the M 'Naghten test of insanity, also called the (right-wrong test). The person was not criminally responsible if at the time of the crime, that he or she did not know that what they were doing was wrong or what the nature of the act was. A jury is required to answer two questions about the evidence they heard. One is his she or she didn 't know what they were doing when he or she committed the crime. Two was if the defendant understood that his or her actions were wrong. This test had many faults with it and people stopped using it to prove weather a person was insane or sane. The Irresistible impulse test was used as a alternative to the M 'Naghten test. This test was a theory based on the fact that the mental disease could force a person to act against their own will, and a person could be driven by a irresistible impulse. This had many faults also but was used until around the 1950 's when the Durham test came into play. This was a test that asked two questions of the jury, one did the defendant have a mental disease or defect? And if so, was the disease or defect the reason for the crime? The jury had to come back with both answers yes to give the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. In the 1970 's this was a test no longer used and the American Law Institute test was adopted. This test was based on two test that I have explained the M 'Naghten and the Irresistible Impulse test. Many states do not have a insanity defense at all. They make you go to jail in normal population without any help even if you are mentally insane. Some states acquit the person of all offenses if the jury comes back with the not guilty by reason of insanity. Here in Maryland we do not have the insanity as a defense, we have the not criminally responsible. It works like this, you go to trial you are found not criminally responsible because of a mental disorder. Then you are sent to a state ran hospital for adleast 45 days. Now the patient has the burden of proof to show that he or she is not a danger to his/herself or anyone else or a persons property The patient may be released or retained with or with out any conditions. The law judge has to make a recommendation to the circuit court judge. Who was the judge in his or her case and they have the say weather they have had all the mental help they needed to become a citizen again. Sometimes there are conditions on release and if the person fails to met the conditions they have to go to court and have another hearing to see if they need to be back in the hospital for treatment.
I have found that all states differ on this matter what one state dose another will not due. This has made me go crazy to find information about this criminally committed state. there are many people in the system today that have been found to fit under this criminally committed criteria like John H Hinckley Jr., David Berkowitz, Herbert Mullin who heard his father 's voice in his head, telling him to kill someone for him. This man was convinced he was preventing earthquakes and tidal waves by killing people. These people like Ted Bundy all had severe mental problems but do you think they should be helped or not helped. Sometimes I think that help is out their before they do a crime but can they find it? I really don 't know. Did these people even know that they were sick? I think the court system still has room for improvement on this matter.
I hope what I wrote about helps, I was all over the place with this.

WORKS CITED
WWW.CrimeLibrary.com/Serial_killers/notorious/Tick/Insane_8.html?sect=19
Http://www.oah.state.md.us
Http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/doc/cr/content/htm/cr.001.00.000046.htm
http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d029.htm
Laws of Evidence BY: Thomas Buckles
Criminal Law 8th Edition by Thomas J. Gardner and Terry M. Anderson

Cited: WWW.CrimeLibrary.com/Serial_killers/notorious/Tick/Insane_8.html?sect=19 Http://www.oah.state.md.us Http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/doc/cr/content/htm/cr.001.00.000046.htm http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d029.htm Laws of Evidence BY: Thomas Buckles Criminal Law 8th Edition by Thomas J. Gardner and Terry M. Anderson

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three medical experts concluded that Miller satisfied the MNaughten insanity test during the period in which he stabbed Goring. The test for insanity had been used in Nevada since 1889. State v. Lewis, 20 Nev.333, 22 P.241 (1889). The defense used the MNaughten test to show that the defendant did not understand his actions and could not tell the difference between right and wrong. During the close of evidence in the trial the district court instructed the jury to determine if Miller was legally insane when he killed…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The McNaughton rules were used to decide if a crime was committed by someone who was deemed to be insane at the time of their crime. McNaughton rules were so named after Daniel McNaughton who attempted to kill the current Prime Minister as he had an imaginary grudge against him but for no real reason, just his “state of mind” at the time had led him to believe that so he was found “not guilty by reason of insanity”…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Fire Case Study

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The collection and application of evidence have become essential to criminal investigations and prosecutions. Clear and convincing evidence could prove a crime that has been committed, establish key elements of a crime, target a suspect and someone associated with a crime, exonerate the innocent, corroborate a victim’s testimony, and assist in establishing the facts of what occurred (McEwen). Although evidence plays a significant role in prosecutions, there are still many cases involving misuse of evidence, which results in the conviction of an innocent person. In the case of “Trial by Fire,” due to the misuse of evidence by the fire investigators, the State of Texas wrongfully executed Cameron Todd Willingham who was convicted of murdering…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is only raised in 1% of cases and then only successful 25% of the time it is used; although its rarity, the legal court has very detailed rules. Most rules describe not guilty by reason of insanity as not being aware of what you were doing in that exact moment. Adam Banner suggests that the Eddie Routh case had an accurate ruling of guilty because of his claim that, “...the disposition is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. It is not ‘not guilty by reason of mental illness’,”. Only Mental Health America would disagree, stating, “The Court has indicated that states may be required to provide at least some minimal defense based on mental illness,”. Coincidently, these changes have not been made thus…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Compared to M'Naghten, it lowered the insanity standard from an absolute knowledge of right from wrong to a substantial incapacity to appreciate the difference between right and wrong; thereby recognizing degrees of incapacity. ALI also broadened the insanity test to include a volitional or "irresistible impulse" component. The test focused…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unlike the M’Naghten test, the ALI has a volitional prong as well. Volitional is saying you know it's wrong, you still commit it because you have to not by free choice. Volition tests have ways of seeing if they were insane by three distinguishing factors: was the crime premeditated, did they have the capacity to make choices, and did they think about getting caught. The volitional prong has different mental disorders closely tied including Bipolar 2 and paraphilias that could prohibit one’s free choice. In conclusion, the ALI is a lot less strict than the two other types of tests, but do incorporate both cognitive and volitional prongs.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleading insanity can also help pick out the groups of people that need medical attention, and put them into the correct facilities ("12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense."). Cons of the insanity defense, would be that it is very difficult to prove someone was in the wrong state of mind during the crime, and an increase in trial costs. Depending on the state's rules on insanity, they can still be sent to prison, even if the criminal does in fact have a mental…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is a controversial legal defense which states that a defendant should not be found culpable of a crime on the basis of insanity. The main factor that makes this defense so controversial is the difficulty in interpreting what exactly should be defined as insanity. To add the distortion, many different states also have completely different rules and attitudes towards the insanity defense. Many misconceptions about the insanity defense exist throughout society. For starters, the term insanity is strictly a legal term, not a psychological or medical term. Although various movies and television shows portray the insanity defense as a commonly used and successful defense, the opposite is true in reality. Even though statistics…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    And often the cases involving an insanity plea gets the most attention because they involve crime that are bizarre within themselves. On February 22, 2016 an article name “Maryland Mom Found Not Responsible in Boy Death in Swing” was release. This article shares with us that Simms was found not responsible in her son’s death. Simms was found pushing her son in a park swing for 40 hours until he died from hypothermia and dehydration. “She was then ruled not criminally responsible, Maryland's equivalent to not guilty by reason of insanity.”(Ahn) She was later found not responsible since she was declare to have schizophrenia. She was ruled not to be a danger to the community and was freed on a conditional release.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Defense

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Those who were able to successfully use the insanity defense, were sentenced to a mental hospital rather than prison. Which is why some attorneys push for the insanity defense, for their clients. They see it as the easy way out, because being sent to a mental institution is more convenient than prison. In one particular case the suspect was sentenced, but then after revaluation was considered insane. This case deals with a woman who drowned her five kids in her bathtub. This woman is called, Andrea Yates, and has a history of postpartum depression and psychosis. Postpartum depression, is a clinical depression related to pregnancy and childbirth, which occurs within the first 4 years after delivery(WebMD. Understanding Postpartum Depression). Psychosis is a mental disorder where people lose touch with reality and see, hear, or believe things that aren’t real. Yates was originally charged with first degree murder, but after a couple of years was found not guilty by reason of insanity. She was sentenced to North Texas State Hospital. She was originally sentenced to life in prison with eligibility of parole(BIO/People/Andrea Yates, but no one ever serves their entire sentence. Yates only served four years behind bars, until a court reviewed her case. Although Yates could of had parole in about 40 years, inmates usually leave before their time is over. Those that are sent to mental…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays