Only someone suffering a terminally ill could explain how painful is to see his own life getting away and there is nothing to bring it back. It is difficult to let someone die even though there is nothing that can change that. When someone is dying, people wants to do anything to help that person but sometimes instead of help him they make it worse. Sometimes Doctors try to do his best but the best for who? If a patient like Mac is suffering a pain that not even Doctors or the advanced technology can alleviate that pain , why make it longer? Why makes a patient suffer more? .Mac just wanted to be in peace and stop the pain. Doctors should understand that it was out of their hands and in this case only the patient should determine what to do with his life.
Not only the patient but also the family suffers every single minute in this situation. It's hard to imagine a member of the family getting weaker every day and not even doctors or technology are good enough to get him back. Even though the family is the closest people, they should not be allowed to decide for the patient. None should be allowed to decide for someone else"˜s life. Only a conscious patient should sign or ask for that called "no-code" order. It means not to resuscitate a patient who stopped breathing. When a patient is in coma or unconscious, Doctors must work hard to keep him alive because doctors don't know what the patient wants to do. Mac begs the Doctors for just let him die because he was under so much pain and he knows that his family was suffering too. Mac wanted his family remembered him as the wealthy guy he used to be.
There are million of people working hard to make technology better everyday but technology can not solve everything or at least not yet. Technology is saving a lot of lives every minute. In the story, Mac wasn't alive at all. Mac had tubes attached to his body to make him breath. He already was a dead body. He was designated by God to stay like that for the rest of his life. In this case not even technology or human being "˜s knowledge was able to give his life back. It is possible that in a couple of years or months later technology could do the miracle but there was nothing at that moment that could make Mac think about a cure. Doctors have the obligation to prolong patient's life but in this case it wasn't life at all. Doctors were just prolonging his pain and playing with his life.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
There are times when life takes an unforeseen route, and one is faced with an obstacle or situation that was not expected. Many people are diagnosed with terminal diseases, have accidents and are left with severe impairments, and suffer horrendous complications from medical issues. One has the right, according to law, to make medical decisions about their care and treatment options. But should one have the right to end their life? Assisted, or voluntary euthanasia, is the direct administration of a lethal agent to end one’s life at the request of…
- 1466 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Imagine sitting in the hospital, in a chair next to a grandmother who has terminal cancer. She has been in and out of the hospital many times and her declining health has been a sign of her impending death. A few months pass by until she’s back, but this time her health has deteriorated even further. She breathes slowly, and when someone tries to talk to her, there is no response, no sign of life…
- 1653 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Euthanasia means gentle or easy death for those who are incurably ill and in pain. So should a person have the right to take another person 's life or his own when he or she is incurably ill and in pain? That is Australia is trying to decide. The N.T already has passed a law that legalizes euthanasia in that state. Now other government leaders and members are in support of this are pushing for an Australian euthanasia law. Christian Groups and Anti-Euthanasia have seen euthanasia as a sin and a choice that no-body should make. Some doctors have taken ill patients life 's as a request from the patient should this now be openly done. Would you want to be kept alive, with little hope ahead, when you were in pain? Some might answer no, and those people should deserve the choice to end it when that pain becomes unbearable.…
- 1147 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the essay, “The Right to die, the author, Alexander DuPre, talks about euthanasia and how it should be allowed. I agree with Alexander. One should be allowed to determine if they want to live or die. Not only is it better for the person who wants to end their suffering but also for the ones that suffer because of the ones who are suffering. The ill, family and friends of the ill, and tax paying citizens.…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
While If the terminally illness has a hope, the patient and family should consider taking that option of second chance. , A law should be passed in all states that allows patients who are suffering from terminally illnesses. because Terminally ill patients don't have to wait weeks or even months suffering waiting for their death. , Reduce the suffering to those terminally ill patients and their family members. , and It will reduce agonizing pain to those suffering from terminally illnesses. .…
- 1007 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Not all terminally ill patients will choose this option, but it should be available for those who want it. Coping with the diagnosis of a terminal illness is difficult for both the patient and the patient’s loved ones and it only becomes more difficult as the disease progresses. Being given the ability to decide when to die allows the patient to feel a sense of dignity and control during a time when he or she may not have control over anything else in life. Not only does physician-assisted suicide provide a sense of relief to the patient, it provides relief to family and friends. Watching a loved one die is one of the most challenging things to endure in life. It only becomes more challenging when forced to watch a loved one die a slow and painful death. Physician-assisted suicide can provide closure to everyone involved in a situation dealing with a terminal illness; therefore, it must become legal in all fifty…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
What if you knew that your path in life was coming to an end and were told it was going to be insufferable? Would you endure the agony of dying slowly and uncomfortably; or would you choose to pass away on your own terms, comfortably surrounded by friends, family, and loved ones? Assisted suicide is more often than not confused with euthanasia. With the process of euthanasia the physician is the individual who administers the, usually a lethal, drug.…
- 569 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Some terminally ill patients are allowed to end their lives by refusing medical treatments; in all fairness, those without that option should be allowed to choose death…
- 628 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
If people are on the verge of death they should have the choice to end their suffering or not. This is completely unfair to the people…
- 391 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The right to die is a very controversial subject. Some people may have strong religious beliefs that have a great impact on their opinion. Whether or not a person can choose their own time of death in a terminal illness situation is the question. And should individuals who assist in these assisted deaths should be prosecuted. There are two types of Euthanasia: passive, and active.…
- 286 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Death, while a reality for all people, is still a frightening and unknown experience. That is one of the reasons that physician-assisted suicide is such a complex topic. However, when one is faced with the prospect of witnessing the suffering of a terminally ill loved one and watching them experience unbearable pain, despite the known fact that they will never again be healthy, the issue becomes less complex. Whether an actual experience or an imagined one, it is one of the worst situations an individual can endure. If offered the possibility to end the suffering and relieve the patient or loved one from pain, would you be supportive or would you leave them to suffer? Physician-assisted suicide could be the answer for the select few patients who meet strict requirements and who are in need of relief. Physician-assisted suicide refers to a practice in which a physician provides a competent, terminally ill patient with a prescription for a lethal dose of medication, upon the patient 's request, which the patient intends to use to end his or her own life. (Black) Here is where the controversy arises: should terminally ill patients have the right to choose when to end their lives? Due to the facts that physician-assisted suicide can be constructed to have reasonable laws that ensure it will not be abused and protect the value of human life, relieve suffering patients, and allow citizens in need to exercise their fundamental freedoms to the right of death, physician-assisted suicide should be a legal practice in the United States.…
- 2127 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Currently, in the United States, 12% of states, including Vermont, Oregon, and California have legalized the Right to Die. This debate around whether or not to help patients who have terminal illness end their lives has been and is still far from over. The definition of Right to Die is, “an individual who has been certified by a physician as having an illness or physical condition which can be reasonably be expected to result in death in 24 months or less after the date of the certification” (Terminally Ill Law & Legal Definition 1). With this definition, the Right to Die ought to be available to any person that is determined terminally ill, as determined by a professional.…
- 2370 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
The ethical issues that arise for ones that are for life-sustaining treatment are potential recovery, sanctity of life, personal request, and professional physician integrity. Although there are often minimal benefits seen with the use of extreme measures to prolong life, the potential recovery is valid reason for patients to continue with life-sustaining treatment. The sanctity of life, which is the belief that people are made in the image of God and their lives are sacred and should be protected and respected at all time, is dependent upon the patient. Patients’ values and beliefs may differ, but if the patient has a “low quality” of life and still believes that their life is sacred, then the ethically correct decision is to continue with life-sustaining treatment. As mentioned previously, due to laws that have been created, patients have the right to choose the care and treatment that is provided to them near the end of life. Therefore, it is seen as unethical if anything or anyone takes that decision away from the patient, which again calls into question professional physician integrity. A physician is reliable for providing exceptional care to the patient and attending to the…
- 1211 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Death is a touchy subject. People pretend it is something that does not happen and refuse to talk about or address it. I am an ICU nurse. I have been for six years. I have dealt with plenty of death, in my own way. Death is a part of life. Whether it is something that is expected or not, it is our destiny. Having dealt with the suicide of my son’s father at a young age, death is something most of us avoid or do not expect. One is never prepared for it. Some refuse to accept it and move forward.Whether it is a loved one battling cancer for multiple years or a sudden suicide/death, it is never acceptable. Working in the ICU, I have seen many a prolonged death. Family members are never prepared for the death of a loved one. Whether or not my patient is ready to move on, family will do everything possible to prolong the death in hopes that the patient’s condition will improve or a “new” cure will save their lives. I have gone through spending an hour resuscitating a 20 year old with severe congestive heart failure to taking my time resuscitating a 98 year old riddled with cancer. Regardless of my beliefs, it is never easy for family members to accept their loved ones are no longer among us. I have mixed views about death regarding a person battling cancer. Many a times I have had a patient who is a “full code,” all life saving efforts to be attempted, that has metastasis of cancer to their liver, brain, and bones requesting all life saving efforts. In the medical community, we know life saving efforts are futile. The patient is in so much pain they can hardly stand it. They have no quality of life. Family members are hopeful that some medication will take effect and the cancer will disappear. But, by law, we are to make every effort possible at resuscitation. If a person has a good prognosis in surviving cancer, every effort should be made to prolong the person’s life. If the cancer has metastized and is now affecting other organs, brain, bone…
- 3543 Words
- 15 Pages
Better Essays -
A Crime of Compassion by Barbara Huttmann is a story between a nurse and the patient’s wishes to die. The story is about Mac who was a cop that came into the hospital complaining about a cough that seems hard to get rid of. Later test confirmed that he had lung cancer that leads him to be confinement to the hospital. After six months, he lost his hair, bone and youth. Due to his condition, It was normal for Mac to trigger a code blue which announce a patient life is threaten at least once a day. The story also tells about the pain and his wish to die. Unfortunately, his doctor believes that life should be prolonging regardless of the patient’s wishes. One day, when Barbara was bathing Mac and later giving pain medication. She heard Mac moaned “Pain …. No more... Barbara… do something…. God, let me go”. That was when Barbara decided to grant his wishes and let Mac dies.…
- 1624 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays