Computer Mediated Communication
Back to Vol. No. 4 Table of Contents
Units of Analysis for Internet Communication
John December
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Table of Contents
Introduction Defining Internet-based, Computer-mediated Communication Approaches to Defining Communication Figure 1. Basic operation of the Internet's TCP/ IP switching protocols Figure 2. The client-server data communications model Integration Examples of Internet Communication Units of Analysis for Internet-based Communication The Server-Client-Content Triad Contextualizing Media Units of Analysis Figure 3. Symbols for graphic representation of media classes and objects Figure 4. Graphic representation of a media class Figure 5. Graphic representation of three media objects. Integrating Diverse Landscapes References
When communication researchers make claims about the relationship of media to individuals or society, they use the term media to mean a variety of things. For example, a researcher might try to prove the claim "television causes X," where X might be anything from aggressive behavior to bad vision or a crisis in a sense of self. In this case, is the researcher talking about the television signals in the air, people who work at television stations, people who produce or act in television programs, the television programs themselves, television receiving sets, or some or all of these things?
Of course, the research context, setting, and constraints usually define what is meant by the term television as a medium, but how can researchers talk about new media that involve communication on computer networks? The Internet, a cooperatively run, globally distributed collection of computer networks, provides a communication forum in which an estimated 20-40 million people in 90 countries (Society, 1995) participate. The Internet provides an array of tools for
Units of Analysis for Internet Communication
John December
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Table of Contents
Introduction Defining Internet-based, Computer-mediated Communication Approaches to Defining Communication Figure 1. Basic operation of the Internet's TCP/ IP switching protocols Figure 2. The client-server data communications model Integration Examples of Internet Communication Units of Analysis for Internet-based Communication The Server-Client-Content Triad Contextualizing Media Units of Analysis Figure 3. Symbols for graphic representation of media classes and objects Figure 4. Graphic representation of a media class Figure 5. Graphic representation of three media objects. Integrating Diverse Landscapes References
When communication researchers make claims about the relationship of media to individuals or society, they use the term media to mean a variety of things. For example, a researcher might try to prove the claim "television causes X," where X might be anything from aggressive behavior to bad vision or a crisis in a sense of self. In this case, is the researcher talking about the television signals in the air, people who work at television stations, people who produce or act in television programs, the television programs themselves, television receiving sets, or some or all of these things?
Of course, the research context, setting, and constraints usually define what is meant by the term television as a medium, but how can researchers talk about new media that involve communication on computer networks? The Internet, a cooperatively run, globally distributed collection of computer networks, provides a communication forum in which an estimated 20-40 million people in 90 countries (Society, 1995) participate. The Internet provides an array of tools for
References: Baron, Naomi, S. (1984). Computer-mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language, 18(2), 118-141. Black, S., Levin, J., Mehan, H., & Quinn, C. N. (1983). Real and non-real time interaction: Unraveling multiple threads of discourse. Discourse Processes, 6(1), 59-75. Blumler, J. G. (1979). The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies. Communication Research, 6(1), 9-36. Chew, J., & Yanoff, S. (1995). Inter-network mail guide. [On-line] Available: file://ftp.csd.uwm.edu/pub/internetwork-mail-guide. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191-233. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for manager performance. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355-66. December, J. (1995a). Internet tools summary. [On-line] Available: http://www.rpi.edu/Internet/Guides/decemj/internet-tool s.html. December, J. (1995b). Presenting Java. Indianapolis, IN: Sams.Net. December, J., & Randall, N. (1995). The World-Wide Web unleashed (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Sams.Net. DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 589-609. Feenberg, A. (1989). The written world: On the theory and practice of computer conferencing. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 22-39). Oxford: Pergamon Press. Feenberg, A. (1992). From information to communication: The French experience with videotex. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 168-187). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8(1), 8-34. Finnegan, R. H. (1988). Literacy and orality: Studies in the technology of communication. Oxford, England: Blackwell. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529-552. Georgoudi, M., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). The emergence of contextualism. Journal of Communication, 35(1), 76-88. Gurak, L. (1994). The rhetorical dynamics of a community protest in cyberspace: The case of Lotus marketplace. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production of knowledge. The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2(1), 39-53. Havelock, E. A. (1986). The muse learns to write: Reflections on orality and literacy from antiquity to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Infante, D. A., Rancer, A. S., & Womack, D. F. (1993). Building communication theory (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Innis, H. A. (1972). Empire and communications (Rev. ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Internet Society (1995). Frequently asked questions: What is the internet? [On-line] Available: gopher://gopher.isoc.org:70/00/isoc/faq/what-is-internet.txt. Johansen, R., Vallee, J., & Spangler, K. (1979). Electronic meetings: Technical alternatives and social choices. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Kiesler, S. (1986). The hidden message in computer networks. Harvard Business Review, 64(1), 46-58. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134. Kling, R., & Gerson, E. M. (1977). The social dynamics of technical innovation in the computing world. Symbolic Interaction, 1(11), 132-46. Lea, M. (1992). Introduction. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 1-6). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991a). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation, and group decisionmaking. In S. Greenberg (Ed.), Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware, people and computers (pp. 155-173). London: Academic Press. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991b). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation, and group decisionmaking. International Journal of Man-machine Studies, 34, 283-301. Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1988). The selection of communication media as an executive skill. Academy of Management Executive, 2(3), 225-232. Levinson, P. (1990). Computer conferencing in the context of the evolution of media. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), On-line education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 3-14). New York: Praeger. Littlejohn, S. W. (1989). Theories of human communication (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Markus, M. L. (1987). Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media: Universal access. Communication Research, 14(5), 491-511. Markus, M. L. (1990). Toward a critical mass theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence and diffusion. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 194-218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Martin, L., O 'Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). 'Flaming ' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89-112). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 917-930. McGuire, W. J. (1974). Psychological motives and communication gratification. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 167-196). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. McGuire, W. J. (1983). A contextualist theory of knowledge: Its implications for innovation and reform in psychological research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 16 (pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill. McLuhan, M. (1965). The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the massage. New York: Bantam Books. McLuhan, M., & Powers, B. R. (1989). The global village: Transformations in world life and media in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press. Miles, I. (1992). When mediation is the message: How suppliers envisage new markets. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 145-167). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Murray, D. E. (1991). The composing process for computer conversation. Written Communication, 8(1), 35-55. Ochs, Elinor(1989). Language, affect, and culture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.