Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Computer Intelligence

Good Essays
776 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Computer Intelligence
Can computers think independently and do they have "minds"? This question has been the topic of countless, bad movies since the 1950s as well as a number of science fiction novels. We all believe that we have minds. It is something that is taken for granted but what exactly is a mind and are humans the only to possess them? Ever since the invention of the computer, they have been a mystery, even to the smartest of scientists. With the ongoing development of artificial intelligence and high population of computer literate people, the possibility of computers with minds must be re-evaluated. The initial question that must be answered before tackling the mind/computer problem is how do you define a mind? This is something that philosophers have been trying to answer for hundreds of years, long before the invention of the computer. Renee Descartes supported the concept of ‘dualism ' which is the belief that the mind is a separate non-physical entity associated with the body during its life. On the other hand, behaviorism holds the notion that the mind does not exist but rather patterns of behavior and our pre-dispositions to such behavior. Functionalism is another school of thought that has come to light recently and draws its theory from computer technology. Functionalism believes that the mind is simply a program and the body, its hardware. With all the different theories, none of them have been able to answer the question on whether computers are similar enough to the human brain to have intelligence. The think the simplest definition for intelligence is the ability to adapt. You can tell a computer to go to a specific IP address but if IBM 's address is no longer www.ibm.com, the computer does not know how to find the new one. More specifically, it can be said that intelligence is the to take into consideration the circumstances of completing a certain task. Alan Turing, a mathematician, sought to answer the question on whether or not computers possess intelligence. The Turing Test asked people to communicate with something or someone that they could not see. The people engaged in the communication were then asked identify whether they were talking to a machine or a human. If the test subjects thought themselves to be conversing with a human when they were really engaged with a machine, then the computer was thought to have intelligence. This test is inherently flawed. The test only determined the similarity to human responses, but are humans the only creatures to have a mind. Most people would agree that animals have minds but a dog would give a different response than a human so the accuracy of the test is impossible to gauge. Another test of computer intelligence was the chess match of Gary Kasparov vs. Deep Blue, IBM 's supercomputer in 1996. Kasparov beat the computer, 4 games to 2, but it raised a serious question…since chess is considered the ultimate ‘thinking ' game and the computer beat the undisputed world 's best player, is there really any reason to doubt a computer 's ability to think? I know many computer people and even some philosophers would argue with me, but I don 't see this as proof of a computer 's intelligence. I think it proves the computer 's amazing capability (it was able to process 200 million potential moves a second) but it still lacked one thing that a computer can never have; intuition and the human eventually beat the computer. I think this is not a case to prove intelligence but rather disprove it. It sounds like a no-brainer- a machine with sheer brute force up against simple human intuition, it shouldn 't have even been a competition. The computer should have won all matches, hands down. There is no way possible that Kasparov was able to process 200 million moves but yet even with the computer 's superior capabilities, he still came out victorious. (It should be noted that the rematch in 1997 was considered a draw with Kasparov resigning.) I think that that the answer to the question on whether computers have minds is still a no despite it 's amazing capabilities. There is still a debate among many philosophers and scientists on whether animals (highly intelligent ones such as dolphins, primates, dogs and cats) have minds and I think that until this question is answered, no one will be able to definitively show proof of a computer 's intelligence.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. http://www.siam.org/siamnews/bookrevs/CHESSIDE.HTM, Retrieved July 17, 2005
2. http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblue/, Retrieved July 17, 2005

Bibliography: 1. http://www.siam.org/siamnews/bookrevs/CHESSIDE.HTM, Retrieved July 17, 2005 2. http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblue/, Retrieved July 17, 2005

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychologists are teaming up with computer scientists more often than ever to create programs that allow machines to complete tasks that a normal computer would be stumped by. Psychologists can now use these “smart” machines to study and experiment with. The article goes on to say current computers will not get any better at what they do unless the software is improved. At Columbia University, programmers are writing programs that are able to change their own code.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is possible that people created the concept of the soul because we did not have modern science to understand how the brain functions. Additionally, there is a physicalist theory in philosophy known as functionalism. This theory trusts on the idea of realization to explain the connection between consciousness and the physical body. From my understanding, the body creates various mental states at the benefit of the body. An example of these mental states would be anger, faith, sadness, etc. In essence, these mental states form to serve a function for the physical being, whereas a computer does not experience these states and just processes information, thus not having a mind.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on my reading of Hasker (1983), I believe the view of the mind or body problem that was exhibited by Piccard in the synopsis from Star Trek: The Next Generation was the Dualism view. Picard stated that, “Data has rights among them the right to refuse to undergo an experimental procedure such as this.” Here, Picard ascribes both physical and mental attributes to the robot (Data). This view correlates to Hasker (1983) statement that, “Dualism begins by taking quite seriously the fact that human beings have both physical properties and mental properties…” (p. 65). Hasker (1983) further indicates that even though the mind and body are different, they are not detached, but continuously interacting (Dualism Interactionism), which is Piccard’s claim, that Data has an artificial mind and mechanical physical body, which appears disconnected, yet, somehow unites to function as one. In contrast, Maddox viewed Data, the robot, as lacking any actual mental properties. Therefore, he constantly referred to Data as “it” instead of “him” and he was not troubled at the possibility that he may be unable to re-assemble Data, since Data was merely a material object or self-operating computer designed for this purpose. This view appears to match Hasker’s (1983) Materialism view, that man is a material being, with the brain as the self-operating computer, but the question remains as to whether or not man-made computers can actually think as oppose to simulating thoughts. According to Hasker (1983), “A rock may be made into an altar, but it takes a living soul to worship at it” (p. 57).…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that computers can be taught how to process information like humans but I don’t think that it can fully think like humans. I feel like computers and its software are limited to human tendencies. I feel like the readings are focusing on basic human thinking whereas I am thinking about deep thought critical thinking. I think when it comes to basic things like typing, formulating answers, teaching a lesson or language, yes a computer can break down the words and meaning like we do, but I don’t think it can apply it to real life situations to fully understand how it applies.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most psychologists now define Intelligence: the ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and adapt to new situations.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Intelligence is mental quality consisting of the ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and use knowledge to adapt to new situations.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intelligence: Intelligence is an umbrella term describing a property of the mind including related abilities, such as the capacities for abstract thought, understanding, communication, reasoning, learning, learning from the experience, planning, and problem solving (Wikipedia, 2010). Intelligence is susceptible to modification through the manipulation of environment. Understanding intelligence is divided into three components:…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Semester Project

    • 1691 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since computers have been created, there have been many improvements to where they are now and I still believe there is much more to be done with computers. Although computers have their own brain they still do what humans tell them to do. Computers can solve problems and look up certain data, but it is all based upon what it is told to do by the operator. This leads me to the topic of what is still missing. The piece that is still missing from computers being able to replace human senses is the fact that they are not able to think on their own. As mentioned earlier, can operate by producing outcome, but they have to be told what functions to do. Computers do not also have emotions or the ability to think on their own which is something humans can do. The only thing computers can be accomplished to improve in this area would be for the computers to act as robots where they would have a mind of their own, but still in that sense they would still have to be told what to do or programmed in a way to be able to operate.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Ilana Moss (2009), “The mind is a tricky thing. Some say the mind is a result of electrical activity in the brain. Others believe the mind exists outside of the body and affects the brain, causing the electromagnetic activity that we can observe with technology. Either way, the mind is not something we can point to and say, "There it is"!” Dr. Candace Pert (Weiss, 2001) states that, “our bodies don 't exist to carry our heads around, any thinking has the whole body participating.” This means every aspect of thinking has our entire body included in the process. “Pert explains that each neuron in the human brain has hundreds of thousands of receptors. ‘Receptors are proteins, and these receptors literally vibrate and constantly change shape.’ She continues: ‘As more peptides were discovered in the brain, more were also found in other systems of the body. Therefore, the body-soul connection is actually physical. These receptors wax and wane depending on how much bombardment they get. They 're in a constant state of loud chatter.’" (Weiss, 2001).…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will argue that computers cannot have minds. Using examples from Descartes, Turing, and Searle about the definitions of the mind and how it works to support my claim. I will be using the thoughts and examples used by these gentlemen to show how they are relevant in our understanding of the question at hand: Can a Computer have a mind?…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intelligence: there are several definitions that come to mind when one ponders this word. Some may think of ability, others will stress wisdom, or one may define Intellect as the ability to effectively solve problems.There are certainly more opinions in defining intellect, though these definitions are acceptable definitions. There could be a reduced definition in which could refine the meaning of intelligence that would refine and condense all of the probabilities of how intelligence is defined.Intelligence could be defined as using one's full brain capacity to efficiently and ethically complete any task life presents us with to the best of our current ability while retaining as much knowledge as possible.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mind is completely physical. It exists in the physical. The mind is one part of a human’s body. The mind can not exist without the human body, just as the human body can not exist without the mind. With this being said, an individual can be thinking about one specific topic and physically doing something completely different. These two entities can function in different areas but can not function without the other one. Machines can be used to make these two entities function without the other, but what individual would want to live in this realm. The mind and the body must function together or an individual can not live a healthy happy life. Many diseases can occur when the mind is not functioning properly. The wrong signals from the mind/brain can cause an individual to even die. This individual could not even exist without machines if the mind and body are not functioning…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Can Computers Think,” John Searle makes the claim that computers, while they can simulate understanding or emotions, cannot think in the same way that a human mind can. John Searle objects to what he calls “strong AI,” the claim that the brain is just one type of hardware that can “run” the program that is essentially the human mind, and thus that if computers cannot currently think, they will one day be able to. Searle supports his claim on the basis that while computers run entirely syntactically, viewing information as abstract symbols with no meaning and reacting to them based off of their shape, the human mind has the additional layer of semantics that can not be obtained from syntax alone. Thus, John Searle proves that no matter how advanced technology becomes, a computer will never think in the same way that a human can.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The answer offered by the strong AI position holds that consciousness is an "emergent [property] of any computational system with sufficient levels of self-modification" (Hunt 1995, 59). That is, consciousness and self-awareness are able to be (or will be in the…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitivist Approaches

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Information processing model, a theoretical Framework of how humans think, reason, and learn, views human cognitive functioning analogous o operation of a computer. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED293792&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED293792…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays