Preview

Comparing Liddell And Abrahams In The Film Chariots Of Fire

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
713 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Liddell And Abrahams In The Film Chariots Of Fire
Chariots of Fire is a film that delves deep into the human spirit. It presents us with two athletes who determination is to express their compassion in training and running. Eric Liddell a christian , he used his gift to declare the worth of his god. He runs for his faith and to glorify god. Due to his religious beliefs, Liddell refuse to run any race taking place on sabbath. Harold Abrahams runs against prejudice. As a Jew, he experiences criticising from the British establishment. He believes that running is weapon because it something he overcome and the only way to prove it was not just run, but to “run them off their feet”. Therefore, how does all of this intervene with socrates? Which athletes has socratic self knowledge and which does …show more content…
Liddell and Abrahams had challenges, but solved them differently. I believe Lidell has socratic self knowledge because he knows God and divine worth in his heart. He’s aware of the feeling of God’s joy and pleasure when he runs. Lidell stated “I believe God made me for a purpose, but he also made me fast and when I run, I feel his pleasure. He know for a fact that his gift should be used and used wisely. Socrates idea of self knowledge is knowing both what you do and don’t know. Self-knowledge leads to the desire to know what virtue is. Erie Lidell is defined as a true virtue he shows high moral standards. In fact, the British elite try to convince him to run on sabbath they wanted Lidell to put the country before God and that he should love Britain more than the commandments of God. Even though Liddell wanted to withdraw they did not let so they gathered up and made a decision, they understood that they can not change or convince a man to deny his beliefs. Eric knows himself, he stated “ Great things for him was that when he stood by his principles.” He went through hardship not because it was force, but because he choose it. Life is not easy but it worth the fight when you stay faithful and true to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Ahbel-Rappe, Sara. “The Life and Death of Socrates.” Socrates: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum, 2009. 21.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Crito Worksheet

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Socrates brings up the case of an athlete engaged in professional training. What point do you think Socrates is trying to make here? Although he was an awful wrestler, anything is possible even if one is destined for failure. There just may be a positive ending to his going away.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The young man who would eventually be called Plato, by his gymnasium classmates due to his muscular build, started off as a student of the gadfly of Athens, Socrates. Plato was deeply devoted to his master Socrates, even attending the event of his death, drinking the poison hemlock After his master’s death, Plato went on to build upon his masters teaching to the point, where both philosopher’s teaching is…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates begins by attacking Meletus, using Meletus’ charge that Socrates is the only person in Athens who is not beneficial to the youth, that he is the only corrupter. Socrates points out that Meletus had never show any concern for the youth until he had the opportunity for a big trial. This is a valid point that Socrates makes and it points out the ridiculousness of the…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ransom: Hero and Achilles

    • 4245 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Mortality: “a hero’s death out there in full sunlight under the gaze of gods and men, for which the hardened self, the hardened body, had to be daily exercised and prepared”…

    • 4245 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Achille's Emotions

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages

    #1. Discuss the character of Achilles in Homer’s Iliad. What is the nature of the existential crisis in which he finds himself, and why is his relationship to both gods and the other Greek warriors so unusual? What realization does he arrive at during his period of withdrawal from the battlefield? What does it mean to say that he is probably the first true individual as well as the first “problem character,” in Western literature? Finally, discuss the reader’s response to his behavior. In what ways does Achilles repel our human sympathies? In what ways does he maintain or regain them? In this context you will certainly want to discuss his behavior toward Hector as well as his final meeting with Priam.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Apology Analysis

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Meletus accuses the philosopher of corrupting the youth as oppose to bettering them. Socrates is also arraigned with being a sophist, making the bad look good, not believing in god - or at least not recognizing the gods worshiped by society and finally, being an outright ‘evil-doer’. During his speech, Socrates first addresses Aristophanes (A playwright of Athens), and his pursuit to make Socrates out to be a bit of a trash-talker who claims he can walk through air along with other absurdities. Socrates claims that although he is a teacher of philosophy, he does not charge. Even though frowned upon Socrates admires anyone that possess such great knowledge and is able to charge for their teachings. In a modest manner he states, “Had I the same, I should have been very proud and conceited; but the truth is that I have no knowledge of that kind.” This is important because it aids in the proving of Socrates innocence, being that if he was indeed such a pompous, conceited philosopher he would not be able to admit his lack of knowledge. Throughout the excerpt Socrates makes reference to many stories in effort of proving to the jury before him how he acquired such an atrocious reputation. Socrates mentions that he believes the only reason he was put on trial was because Meletus does not like him for possessing such unique…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Aristotle were both Greek philosophers who contributed philosophies. Socrates believed that all people contained real knowledge within them and that self critical examination was needed to bring this knowledge out. Socrates once stated, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” In this philosophical idea, Socrates is suggesting that an individual, who chooses to not think about their own actions, does not truly care about their own life. Aristotle believed in the concept of examining individual objects and being able to perceive their form and establish universal principles. These principles did not exist as a separate higher world of reality beyond material things, but were apart of things themselves. Aristotle has stated, “Since human reason is the most godlike part of human nature, a life guided by human reason is superior to any other….For man, this is the life of reason, since the faculty of reason is the distinguishing characteristic of human beings.” Aristotle is suggesting that an individual who logically thinks about their actions before acting on them, are more superior than those who act without thinking because thinking before acting causes less harm and it shows a person who cares for both themselves and others. These philosophical ideas about self examination on thoughts and actions have come a long way. All individuals think in new and advanced ways and frequently think about both consequences and benefits before acting upon ideas.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virtue Ethics Theory

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. Why do many people consider Socrates to be a martyr for truth and integrity?…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jesus vs Socrates

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates, known as the famous Greek philosopher and one of the wisest people around, was looked at as being a very strong willed and “stand-by-his-opinion” kind of man. Jesus, on the other hand, was a man who went through his life not by blatantly expressing and sharing his wisdom, but by making his “students” think things through for themselves in order to gain understanding and wisdom in certain topics. Based on what is known about Jesus and Socrates, two major moral figures in the world, it is hard to comprehend the major similarities that they obtain with one another because of their radical differences on how they lived their lives focusing on the way in which they were raised, what exactly they were standing up for and the way in which their lives ended because of it.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I explicate connections between Socrates’ descriptions of himself and his role as a citizen and educator in his home city, Athens, as portrayed in Plato’s Apology. The Apology depicts the trial of Socrates, and its entirety is narrated from the point of view of Socrates. Therefore, in the account of this trial, we have a lens through which we can view Socrates’ ideologies and convictions. Additionally, because Socrates is speaking directly to a jury of five hundred and one Athenians, from this dialogue we can interpret how Socrates saw his life and purpose in relation to Athens and her people through his direct interaction with them.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    walk the walk. He holds himself in such high esteem over everyone else for no reason. Who boasts about not…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ statement ties in with the inscription, “Know Thyself,” above the Oracle’s temple door. We must first know who we are to understand where we are going in life. We must examine our lives by asking questions and seeking wisdom. “Self examination leads to self-knowledge, and without self knowledge then life is simply not going to be worthwhile” (Stanfield Apology Lecture). In turn, by knowing ourselves we can set goals and develop principles that guide our life. These…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates lived during a time that gods did not create the world but were created by man. The people during his era had to worship, sacrifice their lives, and honor them with praises because they were afraid of the gods. As a matter of fact, they…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays