Preview

Socrates In Plato's Apology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1593 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates In Plato's Apology
In this essay, I explicate connections between Socrates’ descriptions of himself and his role as a citizen and educator in his home city, Athens, as portrayed in Plato’s Apology. The Apology depicts the trial of Socrates, and its entirety is narrated from the point of view of Socrates. Therefore, in the account of this trial, we have a lens through which we can view Socrates’ ideologies and convictions. Additionally, because Socrates is speaking directly to a jury of five hundred and one Athenians, from this dialogue we can interpret how Socrates saw his life and purpose in relation to Athens and her people through his direct interaction with them. Socrates describes his relation to the city of Athens as that of an educator “I was always …show more content…
We can see that he is a patriotic citizen when he says “Good sir, you are an Athenian, a citizen of the greatest city with the greatest reputation for both wisdom and power.” (Apology 29d-e) From this, we might conclude that it is his love for his city which makes Socrates attend his duty of maintaining righteousness with such conviction. Although, his justification for his pedagogic behavior is that it is merely divine will, (Apology 20e-21a) it is hard not to interpret that Socrates truly does care for his city beyond the extent of his divine duty. For, another facet of Socrates’ relation to Athens which appears in in the tone of his speech, is that of a concerned citizen, who wants good for his polis. Socrates goes so far as to state “Indeed, men of Athens, I am far from making a defense now on my own behalf, as might be thought, but on yours, to prevent you from wrongdoing by mistreating the god’s gift to you by condemning me.” (Apology 30d-e) This seems to shows that he cares more for the moral solidity of Athens than his own defense. Which is a theme that appears a number of times throughout the Apology, giving us the sense that Socrates sees himself as a caring father-like figure of Athens. This, combined with Socrates love for his city, may suggest that he was not simply a man devoutly following the orders of the gods (though this certainly seems to be a major factor), but was …show more content…
In his defense, Socrates focuses on his relationship to Athens as an asset to her prosperity. One of the ways he accomplishes this is by his skillful use of the Greek hero’s image. Using his and the hero’s common purpose, to educate, Socrates doubly reinforces his image as Athen’s benefactor, not her enemy as his accusers claim. The context of the trial allows us to see how Socrates addresses with the jury, therefore we do not have to solely take his word on his relationship with Athens, because we can see their interaction directly, which is, perhaps, even more revealing than his descriptions of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    A good citizen fights for justice. A good citizen resists unfair laws. And a good citizen also rebels to change the rules that they feel needs to be adjusted. Socrates in Plato’s Crito makes it a point that a good citizen follows the government of the place that raised them. His claim on why he fought for his right to go unpunished in Plato’s Apology is that he was hoping to create a change in the government, and this is a thoughtful favor for him to do because it is important that the members of a state are involved in politics and the government. Socrates was happy living where he was for about seventy years, so why would he be mad at the rules now? “You have had seventy years to think about [the laws], and during that time you were free…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly Socrates does not trust the other cities. Because there is no certain better life outside of Athen not only for him but also his family. Socrates worried about that therefore it is one of the reasons to stay in jail.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The apology of Socrates is quite a mystery; his defense is essentiality unbelievable by the average audience. A character so knowledgeable was like no other and can take someone time to truly understand his intelligence and spirt. As Socrates seeks the truth of the frequent lies told against him, he was determined to persuade the juries that the accusations presented were untruthful. I find it quite comical how sarcastic and knowledgeable he was to be put in the situation he was in. He was able to turn the tables on his opponent by logically leading the them to the conclusion of those accusations to be false.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What seemed strange about Socrates is that he neither labored to earn a living, nor participated voluntarily in affairs of state. Rather, he embraced poverty and, although youths of the city kept company with him and imitated him, Socrates adamantly insisted he was not a teacher and refused all his life to take money for what he did. The strangeness of this behavior is mitigated by the image then current of teachers and students: teachers were viewed as pitchers pouring their contents into the empty cups that were the students. Because Socrates was no transmitter of information that others were passively to receive, he resists the comparison to teachers. Rather, he helped others recognize on their own what is real, true, and good (Plato, Meno, Theaetetus)…

    • 4852 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Apology

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Plato's "Apology", Socrates is in trial for "corrupting the youth" and not believing in gods the city believe in. The book has three parts. In the first part, Socrates gives a long speech. This is Socrates defense against his accusers. During this speech, Socrates says many examples of characters in Greek books. For example, he talks about "the clouds" which is a comedy play. Socrates also talks about Anaxagoras in the first part. In the second part, the court decides that Socrates is guilty. They say Socrates is convincing the young people to believe in things they shouldn't. In the third part, Socrates is sentence to death. Socrates says that death does not matter to him because he can see Homer and Odysseus possibly. He is also not mind sentence and make jokes at the end of the book. In the "Apology", I can see how three concepts we study in class relate to the "Apology". The three concepts are the tripartite framework of tradition (Eliot), a paradigm shift (Kuhn), and intertextuality. In the "Apology" I can also see how the foundational tradition of Greece establish by books such as the "Iliad", the "Odyssey", and "Oedipus the King" relate to the concepts we study in class and Plato's "Apology". In this essay I write about three concepts and also foundational tradition of Greece and explain how they all relate.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates views justice as a set of rules to maintain a harmonious relationship between the people, the city, and the Gods. He strongly believes that one should never commit an unjust act, since he says that much, “In no circumstances must one do wrong” (Crito 49b). Socrates also thinks that it is unjust to violate the orders of one’s superiors, mortal or immortal, and the agreements that one made with others, “provided that they are just” (Crito 49e), i.e. for the harmonious relationship between people, the city, and the Gods. In Apology, he uses this to defend the way he leads his life. Because of what he was told by the oracle of Appolo at Delphi, he has been trying to find men wiser than he is and in the process becomes unpopular by pointing out that “the people with the greatest reputations were almost entirely deficient” (Apology 22a). This, according to Socrates, is just since he believes the oracle is the Gods’ way of showing men that “human wisdom has little or no value” (Apology 23a). He also believes that one must follow their convictions no matter what the price, even death. When…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An Account of the Trial of Socrates as out-lined in Plato’s Apology Dublin Institute of Technology Students’ name: Lilian Muraro (D14125029) Access Foundation Programme An essay submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the module of Introduction to Humanities Lecturer: Will Peters 15 December 2014 Account of the Trial of Socrates as outlined in Plato’s Apology This essay is analysis of the accusations against Socrates during his trial, based mainly on Plato’s interpretation of it in his work The Apology (Jowett, 1871). As a contrast, the work of Dr. Kypros Tofallis (1978) will also be analysed.…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being that this is a work written by Plato rather than his master Socrates it is possible for the reader to see how Socrates and his way of Philosophical thinking inspires those who have a thirst for knowledge. It is because of this that many of Socrates’s persecutors believed him to be a dangerous man. This is made apparent with one of the accusations made. This accusation claimed that Socrates charged his students for the opportunity to expand their mind. This was most likely done to dissuade future student from following in the path of this great philosopher. To this Socrates replied “As little foundation is there for the report that I am a teacher, and take money; this accusation has no more truth in it than the other. Although, if a man were really able to instruct mankind, to receive money for giving instruction would, in my opinion, be an honour to him. (2)” What this quote his saying…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apology by Plato tells the story of Socrates after he was put on trial. This text shows the argument that Socrates made while he was fighting for his life. He was sentenced to death because the people of Athens felt like he was corrupting the youth that lived in the city. Plato characterized Socrates as a kind, innocent man who was unfairly blamed for a crime that he did not commit. The audience in this book is the jury and the citizens that appeared in court but the bigger audience is those who sentenced Socrates to death. Plato wants to make the jury feel guilty for putting an innocent man to death. It is clear that no matter how innocent Socrates appeared he had no chance of being released. Through an analysis of Socrates’ argument and the jury’s decision, it is shown that the word choice and how Socrates characterizes himself led the audience to feel sympathy for him.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the stand Socrates takes, he argues that since he has lived in Athens all his life, he is required to stand his ground and take what 's thrown his way, even if that punishment is death. Socrates says "do you think you have the right to retaliation against your country and its laws?" (Plato) Socrates was a master of words. It is easy to say that his intellect allowed him to make anyone see all sides of an argument. Even Crito at times is confused about his decision to free his friend, thinking that he is making the right decision. Socrates continues, "or do you think it possible for a city not to be destroyed if the verdicts of its courts have no force but are nullified and set at naught by private individuals."(Plato) Socrates’ words are very convincing, but what he is not thinking about is the fact that this whole predicament was not meant to be. Socrates was supposed to be in all likelihood banished from Athens by the courts. Nobody suspected that Socrates would advocate for his own death. In regards to his situation, if he were to leave, the towns’ people would not have thought badly about his decision to keep his life. Perhaps if he had though about this, he would…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While waiting for his tragic death, Socrates goes into a conversation with Crito where he develops four main reasons why he should stay in Athens. First of all, the crowd can do neither good nor harm and that the multitude’s actions are utterly random and irrational. The judgement of the multitude constantly changes with remarkable similarity. It is also impossible to determine why their judgement changes. “The crowd will love someone for a certain quality, and hate another for the same exact quality. They will love one person today and hate the same person tomorrow”. I believe this is the reason why Socrates hated democracy, for he believed that the crowd is very gullible, and lacks the foundation to use reason as their means to find the truth. The second idea examined in the dialogue is that men should only regard the opinions of wise men. Socrates uses an analogy of a gymnast and his trainer. The gymnast should only regard the praise, criticism and teachings of his trainer, and should disregard everyone else’s opinion. If he does not regard his trainer’s wisdom, then he will likely suffer harm and not improve his gymnastic abilities to the utmost. Furthermore, if he regards the opinion of the crowd that is ignorant of the proper techniques and exercises required to improve in gymnastics, then he will again suffer harm and fall short of the greatness of which he is capable of. This analogy holds true in all other endeavors. Any man who wants to improve his soul should only regard the opinion of one who knows how to improve the soul. The third idea presented in the dialogue was never to do harm or revenge, because warding off evil by evil deeds is injustice, and to do injustice is always unjust regardless of the situation. In the apology, Socrates recalls the story of how Achilles avenged his cousin’s death by slaying hector. He extols Achilles’s virtue and his desire to die…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Due to experiencing the volatile state of the Athenian government, it is not surprising that Socrates had much to say on the topic of political philosophy. Central to his political theory was his position on how citizens ought to approach ethics and politics. In the Apology, Socrates' conduct demonstrates his belief that citizens must not be complacent when it comes to political virtue. In order to push citizens out of complacency, Socrates used a method called the “elecnhus” to prod citizens to discover the true definition of virtues (Jowett, 2009). In doing this, Socrates hoped to promote a rigorous understanding of traditional moral virtues; an understanding of what courage, justice, and wisdom, truly meant (Jowett, 2009). At first glance, it seems that Socrates is promoting the appreciation of the traditional virtues, and is therefore a conservative. On the contrary, I will argue that Socrates' conservative rationale serves only as a diversion from his radical intentions. In defending this statement, I will first outline Socrates' conduct and motives in the Apology. Second, I will present the argument for how this behaviour can be interpreted as being conservative using narratives from Crito and The Republic. Lastly, I will argue why this behaviour instead demonstrates that Socrates was a radical.…

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reusi 1 Raye Reusi D. Ryals Writing 1 November 14, 2012 Socrates’ Stand on Democracy Having emphasized upon me the advantages of democracy, I have always believed that it is the best system to implement in a country. Ignoring the flaws and weaknesses of this type of system, I thought that the benefits outweigh all costs. I assume that giving the power to the people is better than having one person rule the state. However, in Plato’s account on the life of his mentor Socrates, we are able to see both sides of the spectrum: the pros and cons of democracy which are accounted in Plato’s dialogues, the Apology and the Crito. Socrates, having been accused of impiety, is brought to trial in front of the jury of Athens. In his defense, he points out the flaws of a democratic system, but he has an underlying intention to improve it. Thus, despite his criticisms on the use of rhetoric, involvement in politics, and the opinions of the majority, Socrates generally takes a pro-democracy approach on his purpose of being in Athens, the importance of examining truth and life, and the significance of respecting the law. Socrates is known in Athens for his dialectic approach of questioning and examining the ideas of the people. He has unintentionally annoyed many Athenian citizens which has made him infamous. This has led other people, such as Meletus, to press charges against him. In his defense, Socrates sets himself apart from others who bring their family and friends as a kind of an appeal to the jurymen. Through tears and emotional plea, they beg to be acquitted. However, Socrates does not intend to present such acts as he places greater significance to his, the jury’s, and the city’s reputations. He considers it shameful to try to win approval through emotional appeal rather than the truth as it brings dishonor to the city (37). Socrates points out then that it is the role of a juryman not to acquit someone who seems favorable, but “to judge according to…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates, a Greek philosopher from Athens, was born in the year 469 B.C. According to Solomon, Higgins & Martin (2012), Socrates was describes as” shiftless” and a master of verbal trickery, but his students still virtually worshipped him and described him as, “the bravest, most wise and most upright man of our times.” Socrates preached to his students and the city of Athens that virtue, moral excellence or what is right, was the highest ideal (Solomon, Higgins & Martin, 2012). Throughout his trial and death his ideas and theories were written down in dialogues by his pupil Plato, In “The Apology” and “The Crito.”…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    random file

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have a duty to enlighten other people even if the other people don’t want it…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays