“Although composed in different times and contexts, Frankenstein and Blade Runner are strikingly similar in content and values”…
Shelly and Scott reflect, nature and the natural world in the texts they create, Frankenstein and Blade Runner using literary devices and societal context. In Blade Runner, Scott uses the aspects of the 20th century tradition of dystopias and film noir as literary devices. Throughout Shelly's work of Frankenstein, the romantic and sublime themes of the era are examined as literary devices. The appreciation for the natural wonder of the world is evident throughout Frankenstein when Shelly emphasises to the reader, the sweeping landscapes that are stark, barren and majestic, nature therefore is used as a literary device to simulate the readers sense of emotions, an example of this is when Victor walks through the Alps to relieve himself from…
“In what ways does a comparative study accentuate the distinctive contexts of Frankenstein and Blade Runner?”…
How frank represents the context of 1818 are both warnings to the evil of technology…
How has the context of each of the composers affected the representation of their respective worlds an the place of nature in these world?…
Although perspectives and values change with time, ideas and concepts can transcend. The gothic novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and the science fiction film Blade Runner directed by Ridley Scott although composed over one hundred years apart contain the same perennial concepts on the nature of humanity. This is portrayed through notions of dehumanization, monstrosity and redemption, of the “indistinguishable” creator and creature relationship. The romanticist Shelly wrote her gothic novel the enlightenment era which posed questions concerning the mystery of life and nature of humanity. Scott on the other hand composed in the post-industrial age, where technology and morality played a dominant role in society. The composers explore their contextual values while upholding transcendent concepts of humanity incorporating morality and creation though unique techniques in accordance…
* Prometheus represents on who has defied and challenged the natural order; one who has transgressed on forbidden territory. His actions are not couched in connotations of courage or heroism but recognised as reckless and without any thought to the possible consequences.…
Mary Shelley’s science fiction novel “Frankenstein” written in 1818 and “Bladerunner”, Ridley Scott’s 1982 cult classic film have nearly two hundred years separating them, yet they raise similar societal concerns.. Both raise the question of what it is to be human and explore the pursuit of eternal life which can be examined using the literary and cinematic techniques prevalent in the texts.…
'The fear, anxiety and uncertainty of the future have shaped the composers' values as well as their perspective of their own society'. Compare how this idea is represented in Frankenstein and Blade Runner.…
To what extent does your comparative study of Frankenstein and Blade Runner suggest that the relationship between science and nature is an important universal concern?…
Shelley’s Gothic novel, Frankenstein, explores the complex nature of mankind by considering the consequences of an unrestricted pursuit of science. A rise in scientific experimentation with Galvanism during Shelley’s time is reflected through the protagonist Victor as he uses it to bestow life. Shelley portrays Victor and the Creature as complex beings, demonstrating both inhuman and human qualities. Despite this, the subsequent rejection by his creator and the De Lacy family drives the Creature to ‘eternal rejection and vengeance of mankind’. Victor’s initial response when meeting the creature, demonstrates his savage, cruel treatment and lack of responsibility towards his creation.…
Analyse how Frankenstein and Blade Runner imaginatively portray individuals who challenge the established values of their time…
Mary Shelley’s nineteenth century epistolary novel, Frankenstein (1818), and Ridley Scott’s late twentieth century post-modern film, Blade Runner (1992), bear striking similarities when studied as texts in time, as they both aim to warn humanity about attempting to usurp of the role of God in creating life. However, their respective contexts mean that the way in which they present notions about humanity differs. Shelley and Scott have extrapolated their various concerns born from their respective contexts regarding the confusion and anxiety that results when mankind pursues their knowledge without regard for their responsibilities. Shelley presents us with humanity’s flaws, which are evident in the way they have neglected what they have created. Scott portrays a futuristic world that has become horrifically debased and inhumane, as mankind has failed to maintain the natural order after overstepping scientific and technological boundaries. Both composers conceptually focus on the parental duties of creators toward their creation and the consequences of abandoning them. Through their different styles and techniques relative to their respective audience, each composer is extremely successful in presenting the changing values and attitudes respective of their eras.…
How does a comparative study of Frankenstein and Blade Runner bring to the fore ideas about the consequences of the desire for control?…
In both Frankenstein and Blade Runner there is an agonising revelation that ‘sporting thus with life’ can result in dehumanisation, whereby humans, Frankenstein and Tyrell, descent into monstrosity and their monstrous creations, the “abhorred wretch” and replicants, rise into moral superiority. “Was I, then, a monster, a blot upon the earth, from which all men fled and whom all men disowned?” The recent shift from Frankenstein’s confessional narrative to the creature’s anguished first-person narration and the repetition of ‘all men’ elicits the creature’s torment at humanity’s prejudice, moving the reader’s sympathy from Victor to the creature. Victor’s appears blind to his moral responsibilities to his creation, condemning it to a life of suffering, devoid of understanding or compassion. Moreover, Shelley explores the nature of humanity, through intertextual references to the Enlightenment philosophies of Locke and Rousseau who asserted society’s corrupting influence over man. “Sorrow only increased with knowledge…” The creature manifests the theories of such philosophers: that man is corrupted through social interaction. His thoughts begin innocently, but as they “become more active”, a monstrosity reflective of humanity,…