Preview

Compare Viable Systems Model (VSM) and Soft Systems Model (SSM) in terms of their way of dealing with organisational issues.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2547 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare Viable Systems Model (VSM) and Soft Systems Model (SSM) in terms of their way of dealing with organisational issues.
INDEX

1. The Differentiation between VSM and SSM

1.1 Viable System Model..........................................................................2

1.1.1 A brief overview of VSM.......................................................2

1.1.2 Argumentation on VSM........................................................3

1.2 Soft Systems Methodology....................................................4

1.2.1 A simple description of SSM................................................4

1.2.2 Commentary on SSM..........................................................5

1.3 Comparison between VSM and SSM......................................6

2. The Mutualism between VSM and SSM...............................8

2.1 The Relationship between SSM and the VSM.............................8

2.2 Combining use of the VSM and the SSM...............................10

3. Conclusion..............................................................................10

4. Bibliography............................................................................11

1. The Differentiation between VSM and SSM

1.1 Viable System Model

The VSM is a powerful tool; it establishes the adequacy of the strategies used by an organization to cope with the complexity of its tasks. The VSM is a model of the web of regulatory mechanisms that are needed in an organization to cope successfully with the inherent large complexity of real-world tasks.

1.1.1 A brief overview of VSM

There are five systems in the process of VSM, each of which takes the different functions. The system 1 of an organization consists of the various parts of it directly concerned with implementation. Each part of System 1 should be autonomous in its own right, so that it can absorb some of the massive environmental variety that would otherwise flood higher management levels. This means the parts themselves must be viable systems and must exhibit the five functions-- the model is 'recursive'; the structure of the whole is



Bibliography: Ć Beckford, John, 1958, The Viable system model: a more adequate tool for practicing management. (T/H 1993, P.H.D. B3.) Ć Checkland, Peter B, 1990, Soft Systems Methodology in Action, JOHN WILEY & SONS Ć Checkland, Peter B, 1993, Systems Thinking, System Practice, Ć Chichester, Wiley, 1989, The Viable System Model: interpretation and application of Stafford Beer 's VSM, JOHN WILEY&SONS Ć D.E.AVISON and G.FITZGRALD, 2000, Information Systems Development Methodologies Techniques and Tools, 2nd Edition, The McGran-Hill Companies Ć Johnson and Richard Arvid, 1992, Systems Theory and Management, XEROX Ć Robert L. Flood and Norma R.A.Romm, 1997, Critical System Thinking: current research and practice, Plenum Press, New York and London

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Paul, R. and Elder, L., (2002) Critical Thinking: Tools for taking charge pf your professional and personal life. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week4 Ass1 Essay Example

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Denhardt Chapter 5, the author explains how the systems theory utilized. His point was clear and informative. In Stillman on the other hand, the author goes further in details. According to the author in Denhardt, “The system model suggests that the organization receives from its environment the human and material resources it requires to function, as well as requests and directives about how it should operate.” As oppose to stillman,, the author believes that “the lifeblood of administration is power” Furthermore, he explains that the loss of realism and failure are almost certain consequences however it is not to deny that important parts of public administration are so deeply entrenched in the habits of the community.” Stillman’s reading offer a more detailed explanation how system theory should be utilized while in Denhardt’s reading it only mention the basic structure.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHI210 STUDENT GUIDE 1

    • 6304 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Facione, P. (1998). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: California…

    • 6304 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 2 Mt140

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After watching the video “Evolution of Management” one will know that there are four major approaches and time periods. The first one starts in the late 1800’s which is known has the classical approach. Next, it is the behavioral approach which started in the early 1900’s. Then in the 1930’s and 1940’s we moved into the systems approach. Now we are currently in the contingency approach, which first started in the 1960’s. In this paper we will discuss each approach and which one I feel is the most important.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Paul, Richard, and Linda Elder. Critical Thinking: Learn the Tools the Best Thinkers Use. Concise ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. Print.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moore, B. N., & Parker, R. (2012). Critical thinking (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 350 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moore, Brooke Noel, and Richard Parker. Critical thinking. 8th ed. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2007. Print.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Course Syllabus

    • 2081 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Paul, R. W., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainer Jr., K. R., & Cegielski, C. G. (2007). Information Systems (3rd Ed.). Hoboken, NJ:…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    University of Phoenix. (Ed.). (2005). Critical thinking [University of Phoenix Custom Edition e-text]. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing. Retrieved October 24, 2005, from University of Phoenix, Resource, MGT/350- Critical Thinking Web site:…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics in the Workplace

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages

    University of Phoenix (ED). (2002). Critical Thinking [University of Phoenix Custom Edition e-text]. The McGraw-Hill Companies. Retrieved August 16, 2005, from University of Phoenix, Resource MGT350 http://mycampus.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/resourse.asp…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Logical Fallacies

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bassham, G., Irwin, W., Nardone, H., & Wallace, J. M., (2002). Critical Thinking: A Student 's Introduction. (Chapter 5). Boston: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scholarly Writing

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Douglas, N. L. (2000).ENEMIES OF CRITICAL THINKING: LESSONS FROM SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 129-144. doi:10.1080/02702710050084455…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many ways to analyse and design an organization. Among the famous models created in the last few decades we can mention the Porter’s Value Chain Analysis, the McKinsey 7s Framework, Galbraith’s Star Method and the Mintzberg Organisational Configurations. These models attempt to represent the companies as systems, with different elements and relations between them and provide tools to improve the firm performance and help it reach its purposes.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Thinking

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bibliography: Kirby, Gary R. and Jeffery R. Goodpaster. Thinking. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1999 Moore, Brooke Noel and Richard Parker. Critical Thinking. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing Company, 2000…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays