Preview

Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki
The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki- Genocide Essay

Genocide, as defined in the Oxford Dictionairy states, “the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular nation or ethnic group.” Ultranationalism is defined as “extreme nationalism that promotes the interest of one state or people above all others.” Ultranationalism and genocide go very hand in hand with eachother. The extreme nationalism that is a main charasteristic of ultrantionalism can lead to a very warped vision of power and thoughts relating power, and can ultimately cause an action relating to genocide. Ultranationalistic people may treat others in a non human or degrading way, they may seperate others into groups. They deny rights and may
…show more content…
It was an act of the US president Harry Truman during World War Two. The Bombing was an act of desperation to get Japan to surrender. Japan was given an ultamitum at the Postdam Conference, where it was explained that Japan could either surrender or risk military attack. Japan declined to surrender. The scientists that helped build the atomic bomb wanted Truman to show Japan the force of the bomb without the consequences of dropping it on the city before they were to release its full potential to scare Japan into surrender. The Bombing was to stop a potential war that Japan woudl start with the U.S. On August 6th,1945, an american B-29 Bomberdropped the first Atomic Bomb on the city of Hiroshima, killing 80 000 peopple and wiping out 90% of the city. Three days later another B-29 bomber dropped the second bomb on Nagasaki, killng 40 000 people. Japans Emperor announced suurender on August 15th, citing the power of the “new and most cruel bomb” The united states was very scared of the power of Japan, they had a much stronger military than the US. The United States, knowing the damage that the bombings would do to Japan , believed that it was the only way to put a stop to World War Two. The Ultranationalism of the United States in the Bombing ulitmately led to a massive genocide that shocked the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the use of the bomb killed many innocent civilians it also saved many lives because if the bomb had not dropped the war would have gone on with more air raids and more attacks on cities and many soldiers on both sides would have died. If the US had not dropped the atomic bomb the nuclear arms race would have would have went on and the standards would have been different and it may not have been just two cities but an entire country.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, two events that will always lie in infamy, because World War II was ended right after those two dates and the bombings introduced nuclear weapons to modern warfare. The bombings killed over two hundred thousand people and destroyed two Japanese cities, but in exchange for all that the Japanese were sparred a homeland invasion which could have easily surpassed the death toll that was seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As horrendous as they were, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary to end WWII and were justified in the sense that the United States had to do something proactive to break the will of Japan 's rulers and end the war.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to The United States war crimes, killing civilians during war is a serious offense, the US did exactly that when it bombed Hiroshima in 1945. The tactic that America took to end the war resulted in the deaths of nearly 146,000 people; this was unacceptable because the citizens of Hiroshima were unarmed and were not part of the police force. This act was not a reasonable resolution to the war, it was a genocide that occurred because of a poor decision. Killing civilians during war is a serious violation (The United States war crimes). The bombing of Hiroshima was an unreasonable act that took the lives of thousands of innocent people, the majority being civilians.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, President Harry Truman plans to drop an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This bomb is supposed to have a major impact on this city. Tens of thousands of people are estimated to die on impact, and thousands are estimated to die after due to the exposure to radiation. President Truman wants to drop the bomb to end the six year war, however, it has caused a major controversy over the amount of damage it will cause. Some people believe that this amount of destruction is needed to assure the war ends. They believe that Japan is going to attack the United States soon, and because the USA is low on resources, they are more vulnerable for the attack. Others think that we should drop the bomb, Little Man, in a nearby harbor to scare the Japanese. They also think that the atomic bomb is too extreme. The blast of the bomb is supposed to be…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the seven long decades since the decision was made to bomb Hiroshima, much has been written both defending and attacking it. With all the information given, this paper should present an argument that the atomic bombings of Japan were wrong. The “wrongness” of the bombing of Hiroshima can be approached from a few different ways. One reason why I am against it is because I feel there were other things that could have been done that were less intrusive than an atomic bomb. Secondly, I argue that it was pragmatically wrong because the Japanese were about to surrender, anyway. Finally, the suffering on the human level was shockingly dreadful. I can’t imagine the pain that was endured during that time. Even…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am completely opposed to the bombings on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today I will be talking about the bombings that ended World War II , The plane that dropped it, the destruction that followed, and issues that were dependent on the weather.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the horrific atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Should the bombs have been used? The answer to that is undoubtedly clear: no. The bombs did more harm than good. The US had conducted “the world’s most devastating military mission”1, effects of which are still evident today.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rules Of Engagement Essay

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    President Truman authorized atomic bombs to be dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. The two bombings killed at least 129,000 INNOCENT civilians. During the following months, more people died from the effect of burns, radiation sickness and other injuries. Six days after the Nagasaki bombing Japan surrendered and World War II ended.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On August 6, 1945, Hiroshima, Japan, was destroyed by the first atom bomb ever dropped on a city. The first four chapters of the book Hiroshima, by John Hersey, are the true accounts of the bombing, told from the perspective and memories of six survivors. It was originally published in 1946.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine waking up one morning in the hospital covered in burns and having no recollection of being in a fire and being told that many friends, family members, and neighbors are dead. Well this is what many people had to experience in the bombing of Hiroshima, Japan in 1945. On December 7th 1941 Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and as a result the US declared war. The US started to develop the atomic bomb, and ultimately bombed Hiroshima. The two perspectives that the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war and the atomic bomb wasn’t necessary to end the war will be addressed. Many people said that the bomb was a quick and effective way to end the war with minimum American lives lost, while others believe that is was a barbaric tactic that caused the death of many Japanese civilians.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the direct cause for the end of World War II in the Pacific. The United States felt it was necessary to drop the atomic bombs on these two cities or it would suffer more casualties. Not only could the lives of many soldiers have been taken, but possibly the lives of many innocent Americans. The United States will always try to avoid the loss of American civilians at all costs, even if that means taking lives of another countries innocent civilians.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On August 6, 1945, an atomic bomb dubbed “Little Boy” was dropped on Hiroshima and was followed by another, named “Fat Boy” at Nagasaki three days later in an attempt by the United States to end WWII. Germany had been defeated and the allied forces were sure to win the war. The main concern was how to defeat Japan. Japan surrendered unconditionally on August 14th, 1945. President Truman’s decision to use the bombs is often criticized given that the effects of an atomic bomb are so devastating and long lasting. Was the atomic bomb really necessary? There were four major alternatives to dropping the atomic bomb: using the atomic bomb in a non combat demonstration, altering the demand for unconditional surrender, invade Japan with Allied and Soviet assistance, and continuing conventional war techniques.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We can begin by looking at the reasons that ultimately led to the decision to bomb Hiroshima, and the heart of it, with President Truman. On Dec 7, 1941 the Japanese conducted an unprovoked air assault on the U.S. naval base in Pearl Harbor; by doing this the Japanese caused the U.S. to be brought into WWI. Bill Gordon, in his Essay reminds us that, as a result, for four long years, severe loathing of the Japanese people grew immensely in the U.S., and many U.S citizens and members of the government viewed the Japanese as a very barbaric race of people, which gave the impression that the bombing would be justified. (Gordon). The fear of them in the U.S. was so present that they were rounded up and confined in…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays