You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Both empires established effective centralized governmental control over their vast regions and huge populations. But the Chinese, in opposition to the Romans,…
- 644 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman and Han empires were similar in their falls because of they both fell to nomadic invaders. Nomads attacked the empires to try and conquer them. The Romans were attacked by Germanic tribes and Han China was attacked by the Huns. Because both empires borders were so large, they were unable to fully protect their borders making it easy for their invaders to defeat them. The Han and the Roman Empires failing due to nomadic invaders is similar to the fall of the Gupta because one of the main reasons they fell was because of nomadic invaders conquering them and then splitting them up into regional kingdoms.…
- 535 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Although both Han China and Imperial Rome had large, long lasting empires with similar economies and some similar policies centralized governments and similar administrative policies regarding land reform, their techniques of imperial administration differed in terms of how it came to be and how emperors ruled.…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Rome and Han China’s trading system was very similar. These two civilizations both traded on the silk road. The silk road was a group of trading routes that spread between Asian, European, and African civilizations. Many things would be traded on these systems including fabrics like silk, produce, and many more. Because Han China and Imperial rome both used this, there trading system became very alike. Because of the trade between many different…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Han China was one of the longest dynasties in Chinese history, however, the Imperial Roman empire lasted even longer. Han China and Imperial Rome share many similarities as well as many differences. Although Han China and Imperial Rome had many similarities (patriarchy, expansion), the differences (recruitment, system of who is in authority) in methods of political control outweigh the similarities because of they had little interaction with each other.…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One major and most common similarity the Han and Roman empires share is they were both very successful and dominant compared to other societies of their time. One reason these two empires were so dominant is because of their advancement in architecture. During the Han Dynasty much of the Great Wall of China was built. Although the Han Dynasty was much more advanced in architecture than other societies they could not compare to Roman architecture, no one really could. The Romans are known for many things but one of the most commonly talked about subjects when it comes to Rome is architecture. The Romans are given credit for creating cement, which leads to all their other architecture achievements, like the Arch of Titus, The Arch of Constantine, and one of the most famous Roman Buildings the Roman Colosseum. The Roman and Han dynasty were also similar in the matter of what their weapons were made of. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both used bronze and iron for things like swords, and shields. These two powerful empires share another thing in common, roads and trades routes. Some of these trade routes were by sea, the Mediterranean and Black Seas were a huge part of Roman trading. The most useful trade route during this time was the Silk Road. Various items were traded on the Silk Road such as silk, weapons, tea, wine, horses, jewelry, and other valuables. Architecture, the use of bronze and iron, and their many…
- 624 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Two of the greatest empires in all of history, the Ancient Roman and the Han China empires are similar in terms of both creating great inventions still used today; however, they are different in terms of how their militaries were organized and their religious beliefs.…
- 547 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
They both had a emperor claiming divine authority, a small bureaucracy, and divided into provinces. But in the Gupta they gave their local officials in the provinces power, and the Roman emperors still had complete control over the provinces. The Roman emperors even put statues of them in the provinces to remind the people who controlled them. Finally, the Roman and Gupta empires had very similar platforms to their political control, but their actual control differed in a couple…
- 448 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The empires in Rome and China were wildly successful in consolidating power and expanding their influence because they used a strong central government, technology, and cultural unity in spite of the fact that they were located on opposite sides of the globe. Thus it is evident that these factors are the most critical pieces to successful create strong…
- 608 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a lot in common, but they also have many differences. For instance, the Roman Empire relied heavily on slave (mostly prisoners of war) labor, but the Han Dynasty relied greatly on free peasant labor. Although both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a well organized bureaucracy, the Han Dynasty had bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideology. Also the Han Dynasty did not have paved roads, where as the Roman Empire constructed many paved roads (which was because the romans discovered concrete).…
- 369 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
rome and hans political administration and cultural challenges was very intersting. While rome and han created cultural and administrative difficulties that led to their downfall of there empires they still left a big mark on how to become a succersor empire. Rome and Han empires were very different on there administrative views. The romans chose there leader and all the people were taxed equally and more interregional interactive, they were kind of like a democracy, unlike han where everything was based on the social system. The han dynasty power was passed down the family so you basically had to be born into the elite class, they were also taxed on class and very divided this upset some people and later on lead to the yellow turban rebellion and was one reason for the downfall. the reason they were like this was because the empores had varying justification for living. Since both empires were so large the voume of long distance trade increased dramatically. They traded luxury goods, food, crops, technology, cultural beliefs, and also disease pathogens. The diseases were a huge part of the collapse of both empires because so many people were dying and the people that werent dying were angry. The empires wanted to intergrate rapidly but they did not think there would be this much chaos. They were similar in many ways though. Both empires had very popular leaders. For rome they had constantine who endorsed chrisitnaity and wanted to make peace with the other religions in rome, he also funded buildings and built churches. For the Han Empire their leader was Bhuda who also legalized buddhism and founded buildings, built monastraires, roads and rest stops. Both the leaders wanted unity and peace and they also gained popularity which led to all there followers and there…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Third, ancient Rome and Han China both shared economical views. The basis wealth in these societies was agriculture since this provided some of the items they traded, however Rome mostly exported glass and metal-works while Han China mostly exported silk and bronze tools. When comparing attitudes towards technology in Han China and Ancient Rome during the Classical period, there were both similarities and differences. One way in which they were similar was that both their attitudes towards technology were that it was a necessary part of a civilization, because it helps to regulate an empire. One way in which they were different was that while Han believed that technology was a gift from higher powers, Rome believed that technology was useful but not to it’s full potential or fit for people…
- 492 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Many key aspects have helped these two groups have been implemented by leaders today! One of these aspects was there great understanding of technology. Both Greece and Rome had brilliant ideas, and knew what to do with them, but some were more successful than others. One example of an invention that Rome introduced would be the aqueduct. This was an invention that was helpful to citizens in Rome. However, Greece had inventions such as a water pump, which suited a similar purpose. In this manner, both Greece and Rome advanced in technology, creating what they needed to become the prosperous people they were.…
- 452 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Rome a. Definition of citizenship changed over time b. Pragmatic innovation and adaptation as empire's ideals c. Common language was Latin C. Patterns of imperial expansion 1. Both consolidated their power within their environmental limits using a common legal framework 2. They had different patterns of development, types of public servants, and government practices 3.…
- 1086 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays