Preview

Cola Wars

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
761 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cola Wars
HTM 4101 Strategic Management
Cola Wars case study – Five forces analyses

Concentrate producers:
Bargaining power of buyers:
Refer to the case, direct buyer is the bottler and indirect buyers are the end consumer and suppliers such as supermarkets and other outlets. Bargaining power of buyers for concentrate producers refers to the bargaining power of the bottlers. From the industry perspective, it is true that bottler could choose to switch their concentrate producers.
Bargaining power of suppliers:
The direct suppliers for concentrate producers are the suppliers of ingredients. The concentrate producers have choices in selecting their suppliers. Generally, it can be said that the buyers of packaging have a higher bargaining power compare to the suppliers.
Competition from substitutes:
The threat from substitutes mostly depends on buyers’ behavior and price performance of substitutes. As the bottlers are the direct buyers of the concentrate producers, the ultimate buyer is the end consumers who drink the soft drinks. The end consumers have wide variety of choices and therefore they have higher tendency to switch to other type of soft drink based on price. As stated in the case, price is a major determinant on the sale of soft drinks.
Threat of new entrants:
There are some barriers for new entering concentrate producers. First, existing bottlers in the soft drink industry may not agree to bottle the new entrants especially if they have contracts or partnership with other companies. Second, the brand recognition among consumers requires investment in advertising and other promotional activities. Create a brand image takes years and the potential returns may be earned in long term. New entrant needs to have financial stability to stand in the market over a long period of time.
Rivalry between established competitors:
One of the major factors affecting profitability of a concentrate producer depends on the competition among companies in the industry.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2) Major concentrate producers established exclusive distribution agreements with bottlers, which were reinforced by government policies such as the 1980 Soft Drink Competition Act. These agreements prevented bottlers from carrying competitor brands and allowed existing concentrate producers to dominate the market.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Coke & Pepsi have chosen to operate primarily on the production of soft drinks syrup,while leaving independent bottlers with more competitive segment of the industry.The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in cannibalization. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. This report focuses on increasing the overall share and finding new opportunities in the unrevealed markets.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result, there have been numerous alternative drinks in the market that buyers view as good or better substitutes than Coke, such as bottled water, juice, etc. Moreover, these substitute products are relatively priced (i.e., low switching costs to buyers). Thus, the pressure from sellers of substiture products is strong.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola War

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages

    For over a century, carbonated drink was introduced to mankind. Two major contenders in the industry stand Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. The two soar in the industry as they compete with each other. There were amazing monopolistic behaviors found in their doings. Have you ever wondered why such drink without any redeeming health benefits, but rather sublimely known as one of the causes to sugar and fat related diseases, can be so profitable? By setting the health benefits aside, have you ever wondered why such drinks are so popular yet a lot of competitors are unable to imitate and stand up to beat them? The secret lies…

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marketing Skittles

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marketing channels are very important to both the manufacturer and the consumer. These channels are the way the manufacture releases their product to the consumer for purchasing. Manufactures can choose either a direct channel which is the means of selling customers or accepting orders from them. A sales force calls on customers and prospects to present information on products and persuade them to place orders. Retailer channel is the channel that manufacturers sell their goods directly to large retailers such as Amazon which then sell onto the final consumers. wholesaler channel typically buys and stores large quantities of several producers’ goods and then breaks into bulk and deliveries to supply retailers with smaller quantities. Agents/Brokers sell the products and services of producers in return for a commission (a percentage of the sales revenues). Mars company uses both retailer and wholesale channel to deliver Skittles to the consumer. They manufacture the candy and sell them to either a wholesaler such as Sam 's club or they sell them directly to retailers.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Case

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Concentrate Producers and Bottlers were two of the four major participants that were involved in the production and distribution of Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs) in the United States.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are great barriers to entry when trying to dive into the soft drink industry, and because of this companies who have a competitive advantage will make it rather difficult for a new competitor to enter the market. Brand Equity is the first of many barriers, because large companies like…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The soft drink concentrate industry has been very profitable for over 100 years. The reason can easily be found by analyzing the concentrate industry using the 5-forces model.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existing players in the soft drink industry have much advantage relative to new entrants. First, supply-side economy discourages new entrants by forcing them to enter the market in large scale. CSD’s demand side benefits of scale also makes it difficult for new entrants to be accepted by the public. In 2002, a survey found that 37% of respondents chose a CSD because it is their favorite brand, while only 10% said so about bottled water. This demonstrates CSD customers’ high brand loyalty and their lack of desire to buy from new entrants. In terms of capital requirement, concentrate manufacturers only requires $25~$50 million to set up a plant that can serve the entire United States of America. Yet, new entrants may have difficulties competing with major players’ well-established brands and their large scale unrecoverable (therefore, hard to finance) spending on advertising. There is also unequal access to bottlers and retail channels for newcomers. Most bottlers are in long-term contracts with major CSD brands; also, the largest distribution channel, supermarkets, consider CSD a “big traffic draw”, thus provide little to no shelf space for newcomers. In addition, strong fear of retaliation from major players also makes newcomers hesitate to enter.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The retailers have a low to moderate buyer power over the consumer soft drink industry, due to the producer’s ability to forward integrate, the sheer number of buyers, and the buyer’s ability to forward integrate. Buyer power is the degree of influence customers have on the producing agent. Soft drink companies such as Coca Cola and Pepsi have used forward integration to take over their channels of distribution. They created contracts that gave them the ability to set concentrate prices for their bottlers; in turn bottlers would respond to price fulgurations by adjusting retail pricing. In 2000, when Coca Cola raised concentrate prices by 7.6%, bottlers raised the retail prices by 6 to 7%. This demonstrates that buyers have limited control over the price changes. Coca Cola has also made great efforts to take over the bottling of their product, by establishing the independent subsidiary Coca Cola Enterprises. They began by acquiring bottlers to produce one third of their volume during 1986 which increased to 80% in 2004. This gave Coca Cola more control over retail pricing, and distribution of their products to retail stores. Since there are so many retail stores that carry products that consumer soft drink, CSD, companies make, it is hard for buyers to create a collaborative effort to resist price increases.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke and Pepsi Case

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing the financial statements of the largest concentrate producers (Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo) and those of the largest bottlers (CCE and PBG) we can easily identify numerous factors affecting their economies and profitability. The first, and probably greatest difference in the economies of the concentrate and bottling businesses is the initial capital investment: while concentrate producers require a relatively little capital investment in machinery, overhead or labor; bottler businesses are capital-intensive and involve specific production lines for different products. At first sight, it is easier for concentrate producers to earn a higher return on investment since this figure is smaller than for bottlers.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The reason why their profitability is so different can be known by the fact that the costs they have to meet differ greatly. The concentrate producers need lower cost for building a manufacturing plant about $25 million to $50 million, and just one plant is needed. Concentrate producers pay the costs for advertising, promotion, market research, and bottler support. They have to invest for their trademarks continuously. Also they need a number of employees who work with bottlers. However, as to bottlers, there are much higher costs that they have to meet. To build a plant could cost $75 million. Bottling and canning lines cost maximum $10 million. They need to pay for packaging and sweeteners and it accounts for high portion of sales. However, the bottlers are allowed to handle the non-cola brands as well and they have the right to decide on final retail pricing; and top bottlers get contribution from the main companies such as Coca-Cola.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Fizzy Wars

    • 1615 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cost of production for soft drink has increased due to higher costs in materials, utilities and distribution. Neither firm could raise prices due to the above-mentioned ‘price-war’.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Carbonated Soft Drink (CSD) industry is enormous. In 2000, more Americans drank soft drinks than water. The production and distribution of soft drinks involve concentrate producers (basic flavors), bottlers (add sweetener and carbonated water), and retailers. Of all the retailers available for distribution to customers, grocery stores and supermarkets account for about 31% of sales. There are three major competitors in the soft drink market (Coca-Cola, 44.1%; Pepsi-Cola, 31.4%; Dr Pepper/Seven Up, 14.7%). Each competitor spends a lot of money on advertising their brand through promotions, and consumer price discounting. Concentrate producers and bottlers usually share advertising costs because bottlers can target markets locally while producers focus on the bigger picture.…

    • 3374 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The same type of company join together to purchase the raw material so they get the same price. As this reason the power of the customers for bargaining will be low. Because the suppliers sell the product at the same price.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics