Preview

The Fizzy Wars

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Fizzy Wars
The two major players in the Australian soft drink industry, Schweppes and Coca-Cola Amatil (CCA), have been competing for market share for some time, creating a ‘price-war’ between the firms. The article chosen for this Assignment, “Price Rises hit customers in the fizzy wars”, (Mitchell 2014) signals the end of this ‘price-war’ and details the following;
Last year Schweppes implemented aggressive discounting in an attempt to increase its volumes, market share and boost sales of its new product; Pepsi Next.
Cost of production for soft drink has increased due to higher costs in materials, utilities and distribution. Neither firm could raise prices due to the above-mentioned ‘price-war’.
Schweppes parent company Asahi has issued a mandate for the firm to increase margins to 10% by 2015 and so Schweppes have been forced to raise prices to meet this deadline. CCA have followed suit by raising prices, thus, ending the ‘price-war’.
In this assignment we briefly explain the background of the Australian soft drink industry’s decrease in demand and increase in production costs and provide an economic analysis of Schweppes decision to raise prices, focusing on the short run and long run costs in a competitive market versus an oligopoly. Finally predictions on what this will mean for the soft drink market in the future are discussed.
Economic Analysis
This economic analysis focuses on the Australian soft drink market and its current change in climate due to a decreased demand for caffeinated, sugary beverages. ("Drinks Slump Sees More Than $30m Wiped Off Coke 's Earnings" 2013) To make matters worse, in 2013 Australian Health organisations launched a marketing campaign, labelled “Rethink Sugary Drinks” aimed at reducing Australians consumption of soft drinks which will likely result in further decline in demand. ("Aussies Warned to Rethink Sugary Drinks" 2013)
The health organisations responsible for this campaign, Cancer Council, Diabetes Australia and



References: "Aussies Warned to Rethink Sugary Drinks." 2013. Aussies Warned to Rethink Sugary Drinks. Accessed 22 February 2014, www.bandt.com.au/news/advertising/aussies-warned-to-rethink-sugary-drinks. "Drinks Slump Sees More Than $30m Wiped Off Coke 's Earnings." 2013. Drinks Slump Sees More Than $30m Wiped Off Coke 's Earnings. Accessed 22 February 2014, http://www.foodmag.com.au/news/drinks-slump-sees-more-than-$30m-wiped-off-coke-s. Malik, Sarah. 2013. "Debate over Tax on Soft Drinks." The Australian, 17 January 2013. www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/tv-campaign-to-tackle-sugary-drinks/. Mitchell, Sue 2014. "Price Rises Hit Customers in the Fizzy Wars." Australian Financial Review, 11 February 2014.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The case study “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006” focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. ‘ Cola war’ is the term used to describe the campaign of mutually targeted television advertisement & marketing campaigns between Coke & Pepsi. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Demand for Coca-Cola supplier’s products is low because the ingredients used for soft drinks are commodities. In addition, materials such as cans and plastic bottles are also commodities that can be purchased from any chosen supplier because it has a low switching cost. Therefore, the bargaining power of suppliers is weak.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola War

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages

    For over a century, carbonated drink was introduced to mankind. Two major contenders in the industry stand Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. The two soar in the industry as they compete with each other. There were amazing monopolistic behaviors found in their doings. Have you ever wondered why such drink without any redeeming health benefits, but rather sublimely known as one of the causes to sugar and fat related diseases, can be so profitable? By setting the health benefits aside, have you ever wondered why such drinks are so popular yet a lot of competitors are unable to imitate and stand up to beat them? The secret lies…

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bargaining power of suppliers is low. Most of the materials for producing soft drink are commodities such as sweetener, aluminum cans, and plastic bottles etc. Coke and Pepsi have the freedom to select the suppliers. They face low switching cost, which allow them to change its suppliers easily without any price difference. Thus, the suppliers of the commodities have virtually no bargaining power over pricing.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Pepper Snapple Group

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Within the industry, factors such as economic stability, consumer tastes and preferences, and commodites prices are issues that DPS are facing. Since carbonated soft drinks are a discretionary item, sales are considerably impacted by weakness in the economy; consequently, economic stability is a huge factor that DPS would have to face. Due to the economic downturn discretionary spending as a percentage of total consumer spending dropped below 16 percent, lower than it had been for over 50 years. As discretionary spending decreased, consumers turned from flavored soft drinks and colas to less expensive alternatives, including tap water.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Australian Beverages Limited

    • 13357 Words
    • 54 Pages

    Australian Beverages Limited (ABL) commenced soft drink manufacturing in 1937. During the 1970s and 1980s, the company expanded its beverage portfolio by entering into other non-alcoholic beverage categories, such as fruit and milk-based drinks. Entry into the snack food market was recently undertaken in response to declining consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs), the company’s traditional area of business strength. This move also enabled ABL to leverage its strong distribution capabilities to supermarkets, convenience stores and hospitality channels by adding adding such complementary food products to non-alcoholic beverages. Nevertheless, CSDs still accounted for 90 per cent of company revenue in 2004. Tom Dwyer, the current managing director, has been with the company since 2005. He joined the company at a time when CSD growth was stagnating and shareholder confidence in the company was waning. This had resulted in the share price declining by 15 per cent in the two years prior to his appointment. In order to restore shareholder confidence, Dwyer established a strategic planning team within the company to assess the current product portfolio and identify organic and acquisition growth opportunities. From this review the importance of operational excellence was identified and strong investment was made in world class manufacturing facilities and systems. Process re-engineering was implemented to reduce costs of manufacture and time to market. Having finalised the integration of a snack food business acquisition just over 12 months ago, Dwyer is now aware that he needs to identify further growth options given predicted continuing decline in the CSD market. In January 2010 he asked the strategic planning team to undertake another detailed review of opportunities for…

    • 13357 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existing players in the soft drink industry have much advantage relative to new entrants. First, supply-side economy discourages new entrants by forcing them to enter the market in large scale. CSD’s demand side benefits of scale also makes it difficult for new entrants to be accepted by the public. In 2002, a survey found that 37% of respondents chose a CSD because it is their favorite brand, while only 10% said so about bottled water. This demonstrates CSD customers’ high brand loyalty and their lack of desire to buy from new entrants. In terms of capital requirement, concentrate manufacturers only requires $25~$50 million to set up a plant that can serve the entire United States of America. Yet, new entrants may have difficulties competing with major players’ well-established brands and their large scale unrecoverable (therefore, hard to finance) spending on advertising. There is also unequal access to bottlers and retail channels for newcomers. Most bottlers are in long-term contracts with major CSD brands; also, the largest distribution channel, supermarkets, consider CSD a “big traffic draw”, thus provide little to no shelf space for newcomers. In addition, strong fear of retaliation from major players also makes newcomers hesitate to enter.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1980s, Cola Wars between Coke and Pepsi started to heat up. To get more profits than the other, they tried in doing so many things such as a huge investment for advertising, evolving structures and strategies to improve system profitability, and developing non-CSDs. These efforts affected on the share of total beverage consumption which reached 28.7% in 2004 from 12.4% in 1970 according to the exhibit 1. It is a result of their struggling for getting a bigger market share. Also the bottlers and concentrate producers should have struggled as well to make more profits. The war made these efforts, and the efforts made profitable results.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    unleashed a brilliant ploy to make Coke the early bird in many of the major…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Case

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The soft drink industry has been extremely profitable for Concentrate producers. When we study the 5 forces analysis, we come to a conclusion that almost all the forces have contributed significantly in this massive profit generating mechanism.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soft drink industry is very profitable, more so for the concentrate producers than the bottler’s. This is surprising considering the fact that product sold is a commodity which can even be produced easily. There are several reasons for this, using the five forces analysis we can clearly demonstrate how each force contributes the profitability of the industry.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Woolworths and Coles continue to extend their dominance in the grocery market and more recently petrol. This has been extended and they are now looking to expand their hold on the Australian market by moving into the liquor industry. Julian Lee (2008) highlights Coles and Woolworths move into the industry, by trying to build on their previous acquisitions of liquor outlets to challenge the major brands for a share of the $6 billion per year Australian beer market. The article reveals that Coles and Woolworths plan to ‘give more space to their own beers and promote the beers in their hotels’. The beer market has so far been resistant and has retained a strong brand loyalty. Coles and Woolworths are competing against each other and relying heavily on price discounting and forming supplier contracts to attain exclusive supply. The article questions whether or not these oligopolies will be as successful as previously in attaining their complete dominance because ‘home or exclusive brands’ are currently only a small component of the market.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The industry in which PepsiCo produces and distributes its specialty beverages is vast and ever changing. With sales of carbonated soft drinks declining the past five years in a row, PepsiCo needed to look elsewhere to stimulate growth in its core business. PepsiCo thought it had found this growth in the alternative beverage industry. Pepsi expanded its line of beverage to include brands such as Gatorade, Propel, Frappucino, Aquafina, and SoBe. The industry, which experienced massive growth in the mid 2000’s, has seen a more recent decline in sales of 12.3% for it’s specialty beverage segment between 2008 and 2009. This decline in sales is largely attributed to the economic climate of the United States, where consumers are limiting spending on specialty goods that may not be deemed necessity. This new market seemed an attractive choice to stabilize PepsiCo with its premium pricing points and high profit margin, however Pepsi wasn’t the only company with this attractive new market in its sights. Coca-Cola, Red Bull, 5-Hour Energy, and many other companies looked to gobble up percentages of this market as they could.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay is a response to “Negative health effects of soft drink consumption confirmed in study” written by Jacqueline Weaver (March, 2007). The essay was published to http://www.yale.edu/opa/arc-ybc/v35.n21/story12.html. The main idea of the essay is about issues relating to soft drink consumption. The purpose of the author was to inform readers how soft drinks can affect health and also information regarding false researches and data involving soft drinks. Many people don’t think that soft drinks are that harmful to their body but according to non-funded research soft drinks can be very damaging to human health.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays