Preview

Close Encounter and Doublespeak Creates Confusion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Close Encounter and Doublespeak Creates Confusion
Bijena Adhikari
Jerome Parent
English 121-56I
04/04/2012
The World of Doublespeak. In 1989 William Lutz published a book called “Doublespeak” which talked about how doublespeak has been used in our day to day communication from the public to the government. Doublespeak is usually referred as a language to misguide the audience or it is a language “that pretends to communicate but really doesn’t”. It is a language used to communicate the bad news seemingly in a pleasant way. Doublespeak can be categorized in four kinds; first kind is euphemism, second kind is Jargon, third kind is gobbledygook, and the fourth type is inflated language. Throughout the essay William Lutz has given examples of how doublespeak has been misleading us in many ways like “there are no potholes in the street of Tuscan, Arizona, just “pavement deficiencies”. The audiences will definitely not think it is a bad news because they used the language where bad seemed good. Take this example “there are no more poor people, just fiscal underachiever”. Basically it is not saying that there are no more poor people but the words that have been used make it seems like there are no more poor people and that’s not the truth. William Lutz used many more examples which create controversy among people and how government has been misguiding people with doublespeak. In the fourth kind of doublespeak which is inflated language writer talks about giving importance to things that are not really important or to make day to day things impressive. Giving example of pentagon “pre-emptive counterattack” which means American force attacked first”. The language used made it seems like it was not American force who started the attack first. And the other example “In the doublespeak of the military, the 1983 invasion of Grenada was conducted not by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gobbledygook is defined as when someone uses an extended amount of words in order to stretch their sentences out. According to Stuart Chase the author of “Gobbledygook” was founded by the Federal Security Agency and was said to help “Break out of the verbal squirrel cage”. Examples of Gobbledygook can be found in such places as academic and legal talk.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of this textual analysis is to let people who read the argument to know and feel about the poverty problem and changes the way people see the poor is. George wants people to know who are they helping and what are they…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pseudo-profound bullshit is defined as something made with the intent to impress absent of any concern for the truth. The statement will have to contain no information, adequate meaning, and truth. This argues that the term “bullshit” defines a type of misrepresentation which is different from lying and for which there is no other real label. The article explores a specific subtype that the authors call “pseudo-profound bullshit” which is where the writers intention is to sound profound without really saying anything.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rhetorical Triangle

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thorough this brief introduction into the Rhetorical Triangle the reader will be informed of a few key aspects that define this contemporary look at the model of communication. The terms speaker, audience, and situation will be clearly defined and used in the proper context. After viewing two presentations a comparison will be made on how well the Rhetorical Triangle was applied to each instance. The essay will conclude with a summary of which presenter best utilized the rhetorical triangle.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical perspectives in the field of communication offer dynamic looks into not only the field itself, but into the civic-life aspect of this field, also called “lifeworld”. A lifeworld, according to Habermas, is all the immediate experiences, activities, and contacts that make up the world of an individual or corporate life. Specifically, Contemporary Rhetorical Theory offers a way to understand the communicative process and what the communicative process is. Contemporary Rhetoric itself is not communication - rather, it provides important aspects into understanding what communication is; rhetoric is praxis. “Praxis is when theory and action are combined…” (Farrell, 1999). Contemporary Rhetorical Theory establishes theoretical assumptions of human society and the communicative act, as well as, test those assumptions by analyzing human society through the everyday civic life. “…rhetoric derives its materials from the real conditions of civic life, the appearances of our cultural world. At the same time, this activity makes room for disputation about the meaning, implications, direction, and…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zak Ebra Jim Speech

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    More people listen to respond rather than to understand, identifying the words and context rather than empathizing with them, is the main cause of miscommunication. Since children we have been raised with ideals and opinions that shape our views or outlook`s on society, which can lead to being closed minded. When someone offers an opinion that contradicts our own values, it becomes hard to except those views as the “correct way”. Having an open mind when it comes to…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Example: Source says, "The inflated style is itself a kind of euphemism. A mass of Latin words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. The great enemy of clear language is insincerity."…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the present time, politicians employ classical rhetoric in their speeches for the sake of persuading their audiences. According to Professor Noam Chomsky, an American philosopher, linguist and political commentator, politicians not only use rhetorical devices in their speeches, but they abuse, misuse and deform language to impose their ideological purposes. He claims that in the second half of the twentieth century and in order to conceal facts, Americans changed many terminologies several times. Terms like the national interest and the free world and so on are half-truths expressions. He argues that such expressions are constructed very carefully and intentionally, to mislead and block audience’s understanding and thought.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Research Paper

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    cases it will be shown that misleading suggestions are spread by the use of language that is…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell uses examples from different passages on political topics that he claims demonstrate several of the poor practices that affect today’s language. He points out two characteristics that they all share; worn-out descriptions and poor accuracy; and goes on to further explain the problem that the writers show great difficulty in communicating effectively. He claims that much of the writing is vague, and the true meanings are not expressed due to misuse of wording and phrasing. Orwell lists notes and examples on how to avoid this miscommunication in writing, and explains how the English language can be interpreted in many different ways, giving it new meanings, using a translation of a Bible verse as an example.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atlantic Monthly

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Overall, one must realize the complexity of the issue at hand and how they are clashing viewpoints. There must be a balance of language and deftness at comparing these very large viewpoints of the matter at hand. Furthermore, this writer helps the audience see that perceptions are the ones that are able to change over time and that's the thing which make us the fuller figures. Even though I said that there wasn't any real validity it the issues that exist today, I still think that some of this writing holds true to a…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spoken Language: Investigate the was political speakers use language to persuade or influence their audiences…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a statement from the "Politics and the English language" written by George Orwell. He says, " A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation". The whole essay is mocking other writers on their language usage. He claims that the language is not used to its full extent. People use words the size of continents and in the end those big words say the same thing as a three-letter word. Those people also end up confusing them selves in the end.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In George Orwell’s novel 1984 and in modern society, language is manipulated to benefit those desiring power. Power seeking individuals understand that language is the ultimate weapon due to its common use to communicate throughout cultures. The power that language holds allows it to be capable of being abused and misused. The Party, in 1984, realizes the potential power of language and uses that as its main tool to corrupt the conscience mind.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Using of any of these four types of language with the intention to mislead, deceive, confuse or overwhelm their audience, and fails to communicate clearly, is considered doublespeak. Using these types of political language can be harmful when the audience is unaware of what is going on, because doublespeak alters perception of reality, creating suspicion, cynicism and distrust. (p. 227)…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays