Clausewitz Von Karl Analysis

Clausewitz Von Karl throughout European history and his role in battle. As a boy Clausewitz attended his towns school which was known as Burg. It was one of the best institution during his time, this tells us he was very well educated. In his class, there were about seventy other students, most of them were between the ages six to sixteen. During their classes, they were taught grammar, arithmetic, and a bit of Latin. The curriculum was modelled after Hecker's Realschule in Berlin, which sought to turn the sons of the non-academic bourgeoisie into subjects of the state. They did this by preparing them for commercial life. They also tried to prepare them for lower reaches of governmental administration. Some of the school's most gifted students, …show more content…
Each one of which is prominently marked by nonlinearity. The first definition of war “is nothing but a duel on a larger scale an act of force to compel our enemy to do our Will. He says this because he believed each opponent has the same intent, war is inherently an "interaction".” Which is not always the case everyone has a different mind and could decide to do the opposite instead of what Clausewitz thought they would do. “He said it is not the action of a living force upon a lifeless mass but always the collision of two living forces.” For Clausewitz the nature of war produced a certain kind of system which he named it as a system driven by psychological forces and characterized by positive feedback. There is also the idea that the course of a war becomes not the sequence of intentions of all your opponent but the pattern which is caused by hostile intentions and different actions. His second approach to the ideas of war was proposed by Peter Paret. .“For Paret the literature on Clausewitz has been fragmented because of our lack of historical consciousness.” He explained how Clausewitz ideas are still on occasion tampered and looked at today with battle techniques. A third route to explaining the difficulties in On War has been pronounced by Michael Handel for how the issue changes in our interpretations but as it changes in warfare itself. These aspects or thoughts On War are what deal with human nature, uncertainty, …show more content…
It was also the defeat of Napoleon which guided by his study of the philosophy, history, and literature of his period in which he grew up. In many of his writings he talked about the great torso On War which are among the lasting achievements of the reform movement.He also believe that the of educating and improving the individual person was a very great way to learn and better understand what is happening around you. So this was another reason that his politics and theories were so great. “While not seeking to answer every question of intellectual influence it might at least of been an outline of Clausewitz's position that can bring out the full range of his political, military, and ethical concerns. Clausewitz's earliest intellectual experience was called “survives centered on the perfectibility of man.” This occurred a little bit before his fifteenth birthday. He had a lot of mental aspects going on during this point in his life which probably didn’t help but everyone goes through them. Clausewitz “was born into a family that had traditions. So for at least three generations its members had occupied themselves in an official capacity with spiritual and other different matters.”The fact that his great grandfathers were Lutheran ministers also probably gave Clausewitz a different feel to