Preview

Classical Management Theorists

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1351 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Classical Management Theorists
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol were both theorists of the classical management movement. The classical approach was the framework to what management is all about. Therefore it can be said that they laid the foundation for many theorists. Frederick Taylor was an important theorist of the early 20th century and he made many important contributions to management. He proposed the principles of scientific management which he believed would improve industrial efficiency. He believed management could be formulated as a discipline. Taylor’s principles of scientific management focused on cooperation between management and the workers as well as improving the technical skills of the workers (Hodgetts, 1995). His approach is often referred to scientific management, Taylorism or Taylor’s principles. He is also known as the ‘father of scientific management’.
Henri Fayol, like Frederick Taylor also contributed significantly to classical management theory. Fayol’s suggested that there were five main roles of managers, these being planning, organising, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Taylor began his career as a common laborer and went up the management chain. Henri Fayol on the other hand started his career as an engineer and moved up to a manager (Wren, 1994). Both their views of management differ in this aspect.

Fayol introduced various principles of organization and management whereas Taylor introduced principles on work methods and methods to secure efficiency, however both had a functional specialization. They both argued that there were certain principles which existed in all organizations in order for it to operate and produce efficient results. They both aimed for a ‘óne best way’ approach to management thinking. Fayol’s five functions include: • Planning which involves drawing up plans of action to bridge the gap between where we are and where we want to be. A good plan would have the characteristics of unity, continuity, flexibility and precision



References: Hodgetts, G., (1995) Frederick Taylor: Alive and well and ready for the 21st century, Academy of Management Journal, p. 218-223. Pindur, W. & Rogers. S 1995 The History of Management: a global perspective, Journal of Management History vol 1 Nol1. pp59-77 Wren, D., (1994) The Evolution of Management Thought, John Wiley and Son, New York.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Locke, Edwin A. (19820. The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 7(1).…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand Fayol’s legacy and to be able to generalize from it, it is necessary to familiarize reader with it. As an early management practitioner and theorist, Fayol has been credited with laying the foundations upon which contemporary management theory and praxis has been built (Pryor and Taneja, 2010). He is best remembered for a three-fold contribution to management thought.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taylorism, additionally known as Scientific Management, is a theory of management methodology that emphasizes on maximising work efficiency. Developed and named after an American industrial engineer, Frederick Winslow Taylor. Through thorough use of a stopwatch and a clipboard, Taylor put all his research and outcomes into a book called the Principles of Scientific Management, which was later published in 1911. In the monograph Taylor’s notion was to mend the economical proficiency, principally in the labouring output. He believed that there were great losses, when “the whole country is suffering through inefficiency in almost of all of our daily acts” (Taylor 1911) and that “remedies in inefficiency lies in systematic managements” (Taylor 1911). Only by succeeding in “clearly defined laws, rules, and principles, as a foundation” (Taylor 1911), results that follow will be truly astounding. While his theories have survived the system for the last ten decades through much criticism, can it still benefit the practices in the 21st century? Moreover will it be abolished by newer theories because of its weaknesses? This literature review will be an attempt to discuss the principles of Scientific Management, how it advances and limits its application in present-day organisations.…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against Taylorism

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Frederick Winslow Taylor is the person who discovered scientific management, also known as ‘Taylorism’. It is a theory about management that analyses and synthesize the workflow of a work place but the main objective is to improve the efficiency of the economy, especially in labour productivity based on five principles as described by Buchanan(2010, pg 423).The first principle of Taylorism is to have ‘A clear division…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol believed by focusing on managerial practices he could minimize misunderstandings and increase efficiency in organizations.[1] He enlightened managers on how to accomplish their managerial duties, and the practices in which they should engage. In his book General and Industrial Management (published in French in 1916, then published in English in 1949), Fayol outlined his theory of general management, which he believed could be applied to the…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Despite the inexactness and relative crudity of management theory, the development of thought on management dates back to the days when people first attempted to accomplish goals by working together in groups. To know something of the background of the development of management thought. 'Even limited knowledge can help one appreciate the many opinions, ideas, and scientific underpinnings which preceded the upsurge of management thought may help us avoid rediscovering previously know ideas.' (Harold Koontz, Heinz Weihrich, 1988)…

    • 2419 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thompson, 1993, A Collection of the More Significant Articles Describing the Taylor System of Management, vol 8, pp. 52-67…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wrege, C.D. (2008), F.W. Taylor’s Lectures on Management, June 4, 1907, Journal of Management History, 14: 209-213.…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol was one of the first theorists to define functions of management in his 1916 book “Administration Industrielle et Generale”. Henri Fayol identified 5 functions of management, which he labelled: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Henri Fayol theorized that these functions were universal, and that every manager performed these functions in their daily work.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915), the Father of Scientific Management, assumed that labor is not the cause of most problems in business and it is only the management which can provide solutions…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke, E. (1982) The ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation, Academy of Management Review, 7(1), p.14-24.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taylor

    • 1960 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay introduce the Taylor’s philosophy, also called Taylorism and Scientific Management, and Fayol’s Philosophy, also called Fayolism and Administrative Management about their foundation, development, main content, effectiveness as well as their advantages and disadvantages. The difference between these two kinds of management theory would be indicated below.…

    • 1960 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main difference between Taylors and Fayol’s approaches was that Taylor wanted to achieve increased organization efficiency by modifying the way in which workers carry out their tasks and Fayol on the contrary by modifying the way the organization is…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    About one century ago, Frederick Winslow Taylor, known as father of scientific management, hence the term ‘Taylorism’ was introduced.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henri Fayol (Istanbul, 29 July 1841 – Paris, 19 November 1925) and his management theory have been in the greatest debate over time for its relevance for both the classic and contemporary management. To begin our exploration profoundly into the debate, we may borrow Fayol’s conclusion “without principles we are working in dark and chaos, without experience and judgment we are still working under great difficulties, even with the best principles. The principles is the lighthouse, which enable us to get our bearings, but it can only help those who know the way into port. Fayol (1949, p.42))” and other judgments of others theorists such as Forlett, Mintzbaerg, Taylor, and Porter to reveal our view of Fayol’s theory’s relevance in today’s management. Although there are limitations, disadvantages and improvements in need, Fayol’s theory has stood the test of time to be the foundation of all later theories in management. We will elaborately go through the exploration by profoundly going into Fayol’s theory of management, comparing and contrasting it with other theories under the provision of other theorists, identifying limitations and disadvantages associated, then claim our judgment that Fayol’s theory is still relevance for today’s business management.…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics