Preview

Civil Procedure Case Digest

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1565 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Procedure Case Digest
G.R. No. 80264 May 31, 1989
SAN MIGUEL VILLAGE SCHOOL, petitioner, vs. HONORABLE AMIR PUKUNUM D. PUNDOGAR and CHRISTINA TRIÑO, respondents.
Estelito R. Alvia for petitioner.
Macalalag Law Office & Associates for private respondent. FELICIANO, J.:
On 2 October 1985, petitioner San Miguel Village School filed a complaint for breach of contract with damages against respondent Christina Triño, before the Regional Trial Court, Branch 3, Lanao del Norte, the complaint being docketed as Civil Case No. L-111-577. A Certificate to File Action, signed by the Barangay Captain of Barangay Palao, Iligan City, dated 17 September 1985, bearing the notation that the "respondent cannot be contacted," was filed along with the complaint.
Summons was served upon the private respondent through her husband. On 22 November 1985, private respondent having failed to file an answer within the reglementary period, the petitioner School moved to declare her in default. The trial court granted the motion, declared private respondent in default and designated the Branch Clerk of Court to receive the evidence of the petitioner and thereafter to report back to the court.
From the evidence received by the Branch Clerk of Court from the petitioner, the following facts emerged:
On 9 May 1985, petitioner, a duly accredited private school located at Barangay Palao, Iligan City, entered into a contract of services with private respondent Christina Triño. Under that contract, Christina Triño would teach at the petitioner School during the schoolyear 1985-1986, which would commence in June 1985 and end in March 1986. She was assigned to take charge of Grade VI, Intermediate Department. The contract also provided that any party desiring to terminate the contract before its scheduled expiration, would give the other party at least one month notice of termination in writing. Sometime in August 1985, while the contract was in full force and effect, and during a final examination period, private

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    On 09/10/15 the defendant was instructed to report on 09/11/15 @1:00 pm to CSO Santiago, and pick up bus pass. The defendant did not report as instructed. CSO Santiago attempted to contact the defendant via telephone left message to report no later that 4:00pm on this date. If not the defendant need to contact CSO Vasquez on Monday 09/4/15.…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Procedural History: Mapp petition for a writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court for the appreal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first case there is called Limited Jurisdiction Courts and the steps in there is 1- Initial Appearance – is the defendant’s first appearance in court, and the defendant is advised of the charges against you Arraignment – The defendant appears in court to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty,the next step is…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the petitioner’s objection, the seized items were admitted as evidence against him and he was convicted.…

    • 4749 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Case Summary

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In December, Republican North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory signed into law a bill that limits Gov. –elect Roy Cooper’s power in making appointments by combining the elections board with the State Ethics Commission. The State Ethics Commission oversees ethics laws governing lobbyists, elected officials, and government employees. Under this law, governor successors are only able to appoint 50% of the new board’s members under the requirement that two must be Republicans. Legislative leaders would appoint the other 50% of the new board. Previously, the Governor appointed 60% of the Board of Elections members.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Final Assignment

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    NOW COMES Plaintiff, John Doe, without council and defendant, Sally Doe, without council and hereby petition this honorable court for dissolution of the marriage between Plaintiff and Defendant. In support of this petition for Dissolution of Marriage the parties state as follows:…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justin King Answer

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Masumima Case

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Respondent, GAIL MATSUSHIMA (“MATSUSHIMA/RESPONDENT”), submits this Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of her request to enforce the Memorandum of Agreement (“Agreement”) between herself and STEPHEN ROSS (“ROSS/PETITIONER”). The facts and evidence cited herein will demonstrate that it would be procedurally proper to enter a Judgment in this case under Code of Civil Procedure 664.6 by way of the agreement reached at the parties’ informal Settlement Meeting on October 1, 2014.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the Wife’s Complaint for Divorce, and the Husband’s Counter Complaint for Divorce, and the Court having scheduled a Final Hearing for June 17, 2012, and the parties and their respective counsel having appeared before the Court on said date, and the parties having established residency during the Final Hearing, and the Court being otherwise fully advised the premises finds that:…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This cause came on for hearing on the Complaint and was heard on the 15th day of August, 2011, before Honorable John M. Smoot of the Suffolk County Probate and Family Court.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against Padilla

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The government filled a motion to dismiss this application on the arguments that Padilla’s lawyer could not file and sign the petitioner on his behalf because the lawyer was not proper next friend required in such applications. The government also argued that the respondent was the commander of the navy brig where Padilla was being held and not the Secretary of defense as indicated in the application. In addition, the government contended that the court lacked jurisdiction over the respondent who resided in another…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Jury Trial Report

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On Monday, March 21 2016, I attended a civil jury trial at the Bergen County Justice center located on 10 Main Street in Hackensack, New Jersey. The name of the case was Russy vs. Hackensack University Medical Center. The docket number was 003606. The plaintiff was Vanessa Russy, her attorney was Michael J. Maggiano and the defendant’s attorney was Louis A. Ruprecht. The judge was Rachelle L. Harz. The plaintiff, Vanessa Russy was seeking damages from the defendant, her former obstetrician-gynecologist, for alleged malpractice that reportedly took place on June 20, 2011. Vanessa Russy has claimed that due to malpractice completed by the defendant during her C- section she can no longer work. Before Mrs. Russy’s C-section, she was employed…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S. Versus Domingo

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The fact which gave rise to the present appeal is described in the information as follows:…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beltran and Gamboa case

    • 1366 Words
    • 4 Pages

    CRIMINAL PROCEDURE; COMPULSORY APPEARANCE OF WITNESSES AT FISCAL’S INVESTIGATIONS; REFUSAL OF WITNESS TO WRITE FROM DICTATION. — The fiscal under section 1687 of the Administrative Code, and the competent judge, at the request of the fiscal, may compel witnesses to be present at the investigation of any crime or misdemeanor. But this power must be exercised without prejudice to the constitutional rights of persons cited to appear. The petitioner, in refusing to write down what the fiscal had to dictate to him for the purpose of verifying his handwriting and determining whether he had written certain documents alleged to have been falsified, seeks protection — his constitutional privilege.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics