Chapter 4
Chapter IV:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
This chapter deals with the presentation, analysis and interpretation of data gathered by the researchers. Its main concern is to determine the present system in order to know the reason why the proposed system should be developed.
Table 2
Frequency and Percentage Distribution
Of the Respondents
Respondents
Frequency
(f)
Percentage
(%)
Student
170
98.77
Faculty
2
1.23
Total
172
100
Table 1. shows the respondents of the study. It shows that there were 160 or 98.77% are students respondents while there were only 2 or 1.23% are staff respondents.
Further analysis shows that majority of respondents are students.
Table 3
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents According to the question, what is the present student record management system used by the Institute of Agricultural Technology?
Present
System
Frequency
(f)
Percentage
(%)
Manual
172
100
Computerized
0
0
Semi – Computerized
0
0
Total
172
100
Table 2. shows the frequency and percentage distribution of respondents according to the question, what is the present student record management system used by the Institute of Agricultural Technology?
It shows that were 172 or 100 percent respondents answered the present system used is manual; No or zero (0) respondents answered the question that the present system is computerized and semi – computerized.
Further analysis shows that majority of the respondents answered that the present record management system in the recording the Institute of Agricultural Technology,Cauayan-Campus,Cauayan City is manual.
Table 4
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of
Respondents According to the question,
Do you want to use automated Student Record Management System?
Response
Frequency
(f)
Percentage
(%)
Yes
172
100
No
0
0
Total
172
100
Table 3 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of respondents according to the question, do you want to use automated Student Record Management System?
It shows that there
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
This chapter deals with the presentation, analysis and interpretation of data gathered by the researchers. Its main concern is to determine the present system in order to know the reason why the proposed system should be developed.
Table 2
Frequency and Percentage Distribution
Of the Respondents
Respondents
Frequency
(f)
Percentage
(%)
Student
170
98.77
Faculty
2
1.23
Total
172
100
Table 1. shows the respondents of the study. It shows that there were 160 or 98.77% are students respondents while there were only 2 or 1.23% are staff respondents.
Further analysis shows that majority of respondents are students.
Table 3
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Respondents According to the question, what is the present student record management system used by the Institute of Agricultural Technology?
Present
System
Frequency
(f)
Percentage
(%)
Manual
172
100
Computerized
0
0
Semi – Computerized
0
0
Total
172
100
Table 2. shows the frequency and percentage distribution of respondents according to the question, what is the present student record management system used by the Institute of Agricultural Technology?
It shows that were 172 or 100 percent respondents answered the present system used is manual; No or zero (0) respondents answered the question that the present system is computerized and semi – computerized.
Further analysis shows that majority of the respondents answered that the present record management system in the recording the Institute of Agricultural Technology,Cauayan-Campus,Cauayan City is manual.
Table 4
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of
Respondents According to the question,
Do you want to use automated Student Record Management System?
Response
Frequency
(f)
Percentage
(%)
Yes
172
100
No
0
0
Total
172
100
Table 3 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of respondents according to the question, do you want to use automated Student Record Management System?
It shows that there