Cc103
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CC103 ENGINEERING SURVEY
LAB NO: TITTLE: DATE OF PRACTICAL: CLASS NO SESSION NAME OF GROUP MEMBERS REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE OF SUBMIT:
LECTURERS NAME
1. 2.
COMMENT:
MARKS:
RUBRICS FOR LAB REPORT ASSESSMENT
RATING Excellent 4 Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are sufficiently provided and the report are very well organized. Data collected is clearly written and appropriately tabulated; Data is within the expected norms. All required calculations are present and performed correctly; Results ( with % error where appropriate) are clearly stated. Good 3 Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are available but not completely provided. The report still well organized. Data collected is improperly tabulated (units missing) or the data deviates appreciably from the expected norms. All required calculations are present but minor errors are present in the calculations; Result section is incomplete (i.e. % error values are reported without the values they refer to) Discussion of results needs some refinement but shows a reasonably grasp of the scientific concepts covered by the lab. Fair 2 Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are missing. Report is still reasonable well organized. Some data is missing and / or data deviates drastically from the expected norms. Poor 1 Summarized procedure and purposes of work with relevant background information are missing. Report is poorly organized. Data is poorly organized or grossly incomplete.
Lecturer’s Assessment
Introduction (4%)
Data collection and Recording (10%)
Analysis ( Calculations and Results ) (10%)
Some calculations are missing and / or there are significant errors in the calculations.
Calculations are grossly incomplete and / or incorrect.
Problem solving (4%)
Discussion of results shows a strong grasp of the scientific concepts covered by the lab.
Discussion
CC103 ENGINEERING SURVEY
LAB NO: TITTLE: DATE OF PRACTICAL: CLASS NO SESSION NAME OF GROUP MEMBERS REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE OF SUBMIT:
LECTURERS NAME
1. 2.
COMMENT:
MARKS:
RUBRICS FOR LAB REPORT ASSESSMENT
RATING Excellent 4 Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are sufficiently provided and the report are very well organized. Data collected is clearly written and appropriately tabulated; Data is within the expected norms. All required calculations are present and performed correctly; Results ( with % error where appropriate) are clearly stated. Good 3 Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are available but not completely provided. The report still well organized. Data collected is improperly tabulated (units missing) or the data deviates appreciably from the expected norms. All required calculations are present but minor errors are present in the calculations; Result section is incomplete (i.e. % error values are reported without the values they refer to) Discussion of results needs some refinement but shows a reasonably grasp of the scientific concepts covered by the lab. Fair 2 Summarized procedure and purpose of work with relevant background information are missing. Report is still reasonable well organized. Some data is missing and / or data deviates drastically from the expected norms. Poor 1 Summarized procedure and purposes of work with relevant background information are missing. Report is poorly organized. Data is poorly organized or grossly incomplete.
Lecturer’s Assessment
Introduction (4%)
Data collection and Recording (10%)
Analysis ( Calculations and Results ) (10%)
Some calculations are missing and / or there are significant errors in the calculations.
Calculations are grossly incomplete and / or incorrect.
Problem solving (4%)
Discussion of results shows a strong grasp of the scientific concepts covered by the lab.
Discussion